Public support for pictorial warnings on cigarette packs: an experimental study of US smokers
- 418 Downloads
Understanding factors that influence public support for “nudging” policies, like pictorial cigarette pack warnings, may offer insight about how to increase such support. We sought to examine factors that influence smokers’ support for requiring pictorial warnings on cigarette packs.
In 2014 and 2015, we randomly assigned 2149 adult US smokers to receive either pictorial warnings or text-only warnings on their cigarette packs for 4 weeks. The outcome examined in the current study was support for a policy requiring pictorial warnings on cigarette packs in the US.
Support for pictorial warnings was high at baseline (mean: 3.2 out of 4). Exposure to pictorial warnings increased policy support at week 4 (β = .05, p = .03). This effect was explained by increases in perceived message effectiveness (p < .001) and reported conversations about policy support (p < .001). Message reactance (i.e., an oppositional reaction to the warning) partially diminished the impact of pictorial warnings on policy support (p < .001).
Exposing people to a new policy through implementation could increase public support for that policy by increasing perceived effectiveness and by prompting conversations about the policy. Reactance may partially weaken the effect of policy exposure on public support.
KeywordsPublic support Policy support Graphic warnings Pictorial warnings Tobacco control Reactance Nudging
Research reported in this publication was supported by The National Cancer Institute and FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) under Award Number P30CA016086-38S2. F31CA196037 and T32-CA057726 from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health supported MGH’s time writing the paper. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or the Food and Drug Administration.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Kurt M. Ribisl and Noel T. Brewer have served as paid expert consultants in litigation against the tobacco industry. Cass R. Sunstein helped oversee federal regulation in the US government between 2009 and 2012, and he worked on the topic of graphic health warnings. Marissa G. Hall, Theresa Marteau, Seth M. Noar and Elizabeth N. Orlan declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights and Informed consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bos, C., Lans, I. V., Van Rijnsoever, F., & Van Trijp, H. (2015). Consumer acceptance of population-level intervention strategies for healthy food choices: The role of perceived effectiveness and perceived fairness. Nutrients, 7, 7842–7862. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7095370 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Brehm, J. W., & Brehm, S. S. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Brewer, N. T., Hall, M. G., Lee, J. G., Peebles, K., Noar, S. M., & Ribisl, K. M. (2015). Testing warning messages on smokers’ cigarette packages: A standardised protocol. Tobacco Control, 25, 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051661 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Canadian Cancer Society. (2016). Cigarette package health warnings: International status report. Ontario: Canadian Cancer Society.Google Scholar
- Cooper, J., Borland, R., Yong, H. H., & Hyland, A. (2010). Compliance and support for bans on smoking in licensed venues in Australia: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four-Country Survey. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 34, 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00570.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Diepeveen, S., Ling, T., Suhrcke, M., Roland, M., & Marteau, T. M. (2013). Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Public Health, 13, 756. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-756 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hall, M. G., Sheeran, P., Noar, S. M., Boynton, M. H., Ribisl, K. M., Parada Jr, H.,… Brewer, N. T. (2017a). Negative affect, message reactance, and perceived risk: How do pictorial cigarette pack warnings change quit intentions? Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053972
- Jeong, M., & Bae, R. E. (2017). The effect of campaign-generated interpersonal communication on campaign-targeted health outcomes: A meta-analysis. Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331184.
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- LaVoie, N. R., Quick, B. L., Riles, J. M., & Lambert, N. J. (2015). Are graphic cigarette warning labels an effective message strategy? A test of psychological reactance theory and source appraisal. Communic Res, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215609669
- Noar, S. M., Francis, D. B., Bridges, C., Sontag, J. M., Brewer, N. T., & Ribisl, K. M. (2017). Effects of strengthening cigarette pack warnings on attention and message processing: A systematic review. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94, 416–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016674188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Noar, S. M., Francis, D. B., Bridges, C., Sontag, J. M., Ribisl, K. M., & Brewer, N. T. (2016a). The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies. Social Science and Medicine, 164, 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.011 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Pechey, R., Burge, P., Mentzakis, E., Suhrcke, M., & Marteau, T. M. (2014). Public acceptability of population-level interventions to reduce alcohol consumption: A discrete choice experiment. Social Science and Medicine, 113, 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Petrescu, D. C., Hollands, G. J., Couturier, D. L., Ng, Y. L., & Marteau, T. M. (2016). Public acceptability in the UK and USA of nudging to reduce obesity: The example of reducing sugar-sweetened beverages consumption. PLoS ONE, 11, e0155995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155995 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Promberger, M., Dolan, P., & Marteau, T. M. (2012). “Pay them if it works”: Discrete choice experiments on the acceptability of financial incentives to change health related behaviour. Social Science and Medicine, 75, 2509–2514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.033 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company vs United States Food and Drug Administration. (2011). Civil Case No. 11-1482 (RJL).Google Scholar
- Rose, S. W., Emery, S. L., Ennett, S., McNaughton Reyes, H. L., Scott, J. C., & Ribisl, K. M. (2015). Public support for family smoking prevention and tobacco control act point-of-sale provisions: Results of a national study. American Journal of Public Health, 105, e60–e67. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2015.302751 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Sunstein, C. R. (2016). People prefer system 2 nudges (kind of). Duke Law Journal, 66, 121–168.Google Scholar
- Sunstein, C. R., Reisch, L. A., & Rauber, J. (2017). Behavioral insights all over the world? Public attitudes toward nudging in a multi-country study. Preliminary draft. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2921217
- Swift, E., Borland, R., Cummings, K. M., Fong, G. T., McNeill, A., Hammond, D., et al. (2015). Australian smokers’ support for plain or standardised packs before and after implementation: Findings from the ITC Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control, 24, 616–621. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051880 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Thrasher, J. F., Abad-Vivero, E. N., Huang, L., O’Connor, R. J., Hammond, D., Bansal-Travers, M., et al. (2015). Interpersonal communication about pictorial health warnings on cigarette packages: Policy-related influences and relationships with smoking cessation attempts. Social Science and Medicine, S0277–9536, 00331–00337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.042 Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. (2009). Global health risks: Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks (9241563877). Switzerland: Retrieved from Geneva.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. (2012). WHO global report: Mortality attributable to tobacco. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar