Out-of-home informal support important for medication adherence, diabetes distress, hemoglobin A1c among adults with type 2 diabetes
- 158 Downloads
Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often receive self-management support from adult children, siblings or close friends residing outside of their home. However, the role of out-of-home support in patients’ self-management and well-being is unclear. Patients (N = 313) with HbA1c > 7.5% were recruited from community primary care clinics for a mobile health intervention trial and identified an out-of-home informal support person, herein called a CarePartner; 38% also had an in-home supporter. We tested cross-sectional adjusted associations between CarePartner relationship characteristics and patients’ self-management, diabetes distress, and HbA1c and whether having an in-home supporter modified these associations. Greater CarePartner closeness was associated with a greater odds of perfect medication adherence (AOR = 1.19, p = .029), more fruit/vegetable intake (β = 0.14, p = .018), and lower diabetes distress (β = − 0.14, p = .012). More frequent CarePartner contact was associated with better HbA1c among patients with an in-home supporter but with worse HbA1c among patients without an in-home supporter (interaction β = − 0.45, p = .005). Emotional closeness with a CarePartner may be important for supporting T2DM self-management and reducing diabetes distress. CarePartners may appropriately engage more frequently when patients with no in-home supporter have poorly controlled diabetes.
KeywordsDisease self-management Informal caregivers Family Social support Type 2 diabetes Glycemic control
This research was funded by NIH/NIDDK Grant R18DK88294-01 and used resources from the Michigan Center for Diabetes Translational Research supported by DK92926. Dr. Mayberry was supported by career development award NIH/NIDDK K01-DK106306.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Lindsay S. Mayberry, John D. Piette, Aaron A. Lee and James E. Aikens declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights and Informed consent
All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bowen, D. J., Helmes, A., & Lease, E. (2001). Predicting compliance: How are we doing? In L. Burke & I. Ockene (Eds.), Compliance in healthcare and research (pp. 25–41). Armonk: Futura.Google Scholar
- Burner, E., Lam, C. N., DeRoss, R., Kagawa-Singer, M., Menchine, M., & Arora, S. (2018). Using mobile health to improve social support for low-income Latino patients with diabetes: A mixed-methods analysis of the feasibility trial of TExT-MED + FANS. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 20, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burns, K. K., Nicolucci, A., Holt, R., Willaing, I., Hermanns, N., Kalra, S., et al. (2013). Educational and Psychological Issues Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs Second Study (DAWN2TM): Cross-national benchmarking indicators for family members living with people with diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 30, 778–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). National diabetes statistics report, 2017: Estimates of diabetes and its Burden in the United States. Retrieved November 11, 2018 from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf
- Herman, W. H., Dungan, K. M., Wolffenbuttel, B. H., Buse, J. B., Fahrbach, J. L., Jiang, H., et al. (2009). Racial and ethnic differences in mean plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and 1, 5-anhydroglucitol in over 2000 patients with type 2 diabetes. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 94, 1689–1694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nicklett, E. J., Heisler, M. E. M., Spencer, M. S., & Rosland, A. M. (2013). Direct social support and long-term health among middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 933–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Piette, J. D., Sen, A., & Aikens, J. E. (2014). Randomized controlled trial of mhealth telemonitoring with enhanced caregiver support for diabetes self-management. Journal of Clinical Trials, 4, 1000194.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, M. S., & Cohen, S. (1998). Social support. Encyclopedia of Mental Health, 3, 535–544.Google Scholar
- Rosland, A. M., Heisler, M., Janevic, M. R., Connell, C. M., Langa, K. M., Kerr, E. A., et al. (2013). Current and potential support for chronic disease management in the United States: The perspective of family and friends of chronically ill adults. Families, Systems, & Health, 31, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- United States Census Bureau. Historical poverty tables: People and families—1959–2017. Table 1 weighted average poverty thresholds for families of specified size. Retrieved November 11, 2018 from https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-poverty-people.html
- US Department of Health and Human Services Administration on Aging. (2017). 2017 Profile of older Americans. Retrieved November 11, 2018 from https://www.acl.gov/sites/default/files/Aging%20and%20Disability%20in%20America/2017OlderAmericansProfile.pdf
- Weinstock, R. S., Teresi, J. A., Goland, R., Izquierdo, R., Palmas, W., Eimicke, J. P., Consortium, I. (2011). Glycemic control and health disparities in older ethnically diverse underserved adults with diabetes: Five-year results from the Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) study. Diabetes Care, 34, 274–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weiss, R. S. (1976). Transition states and other stressful situations: Their nature and programs for their management (pp. 213–232). Support systems and mutual help: Multidisciplinary explorations.Google Scholar