Understanding stress reports in daily life: a coordinated analysis of factors associated with the frequency of reporting stress
- 86 Downloads
Although stress is a common experience in everyday life, a clear understanding of how often an individual experiences and reports stress is lacking. Notably, there is little information regarding factors that may influence how frequently stress is reported, including which stress dimension is measured (i.e., stressors—did an event happen, subjective stress—how stressed do you feel, conditional stress—how stressful a stressor was) and the temporal features of that assessment (i.e., time of day, day of study, weekday vs. weekend day). The purpose of the present study was to conduct a coordinated analysis of five independent ecological momentary assessment studies utilizing varied stress reporting dimensions and temporal features. Results indicated that, within days, stress was reported at different frequencies depending on the stress dimension. Stressors were reported on 15–32% of momentary reports made within a day; across days, the frequency ranged from 42 to 76% of days. Depending on the cutoff, subjective stress was reported more frequently ranging about 8–56% of all moments within days, and 40–90% of days. Likewise, conditional stress ranged from just 3% of moments to 22%, and 11–69% of days. For the temporal features, stress was reported more frequently on weekdays (compared to weekend days) and on days earlier in the study (relative to days later in the study); time of day was inconsistently related to stress reports. In sum, stress report frequency depends in part on how stress is assessed. As such, researchers may wish to measure stress in multiple ways and, in the case of subjective and conditional stress with multiple operational definitions, to thoroughly characterize the frequency of stress reporting.
KeywordsStress Stressor Subjective stress Ecological momentary assessment Coordinated analysis
This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health Science of Behavior Change Common Fund Program through an award administered by the National Institutes of Aging (UH2-AG052167). Additional information on this project, including ongoing updates on results and technical details, can be found at the project page hosted on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/njpbj/) as they become available. Support for the individual datasets was provided by the following sources. For ESCAPE, this work was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), the Leonard and Sylvia Marx Foundation, the Czap Foundation, and the National Institute on Aging (R01 AG039409, R01 AG042595, P01 AG03949, CTSA 1UL1TR001073). For SAWM, this work was supported by the National Institute on Aging (R01 AG026728). For SHADE, this work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL067990). For WDL, this work was supported by the Gallup Organization. For NTHS, this work was supported by the Basic Behavioral and Social Sciences Research Opportunity Network (OppNet) and by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL109340).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Matthew J. Zawadzki, Stacey B. Scott, David M. Almeida, Stephanie T. Lanza, David E. Conroy, Martin J. Sliwinski, Jinhyuk Kim, David Marcusson-Clavertz, Robert S. Stawski, Paige M. Green, Christopher N. Sciamanna, Jillian A. Johnson and Joshua M. Smyth declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and animal rights and Informed consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Almeida, D. M., Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (2002). The daily inventory of stressful events: An interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment, 9, 41–55.Google Scholar
- Barta, W. D., Tennen, H., & Litt, M. D. (2012). Measurement reactivity in diary research. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 108–123). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). American time use survey technical note. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.tn.htm. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
- Cohen, S., Murphy, M. L., & Prather, A. A. (2018). Ten surprising facts about stressful life events and disease risk. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 7.1–7.21.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 35–54). Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
- Gladwell, V., & Brown, D. K. (2016). Green exercise in the workplace. In J. Barton, R. Bragg, C. Wood, & J. Pretty (Eds.), Green exercise: Linking nature, health and well-being (pp. 139–149). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Li, R., Dziak, J. J., Tan, X., Huang, L., Wagner, A. T., & Yang, J. (2015). TVEM (time-varying effect model) SAS macro users’ guide (Version 3.1.0). University Park: The Methodology Center, Penn State. Retrieved from http://methodology.psu.edu. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
- Mogle, J., Muñoz, E., Hill, N. L., Smyth, J. M., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2019). Daily memory lapses in adults: Characterization and influence on affect. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 74, 59–68.Google Scholar
- Nahum-Shani, I., Smith, S. N., Spring, B. J., Collins, L. M., Witkiewitz, K., Tewari, A., et al. (2018). Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: Key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52, 446–462.Google Scholar
- Ruiz, J. M., Taylor, D. J., Uchino, B. N., Smith, T. W., Allison, M., Ahn, C., et al. (2017). Evaluating the longitudinal risk of social vigilance on atherosclerosis: Study protocol for the North Texas Heart Study. British Medical Journal Open, 7, e017345.Google Scholar
- Sarker, H., Tyburski, M., Rahman, M. M., Hovsepian, K., Sharmin, M., Epstein, D. H., et al. (2016). Finding significant stress episodes in a discontinuous time series of rapidly varying mobile sensor data. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 4489–4501). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
- Selye, H. (1956/1978). The stress of life. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Smyth, J. M., & Heron, K. E. (2012). Health psychology. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 569–584). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Smyth, J. & Heron, K. (2016). Is providing mobile interventions “just-in-time” helpful? An experimental proof of concept study of just-in-time intervention for stress management. In 2016 IEEE Wireless Health (WH) (pp. 1–7). Bethesda, MD: IEEE.Google Scholar
- Smyth, J. M., Wonderlich, S. A., Heron, K. E., Sliwinski, M. J., Crosby, R. D., Mitchell, J. E., et al. (2007). Daily and momentary mood and stress are associated with binge eating and vomiting in bulimia nervosa patients in the natural environment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- The Workplace and Health. (2016). The workplace and health. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. http://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2016/07/the-workplace-and-health.html. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
- TVEM SAS Macro (Version 3.1.0) [Software]. (2015). University Park: The Methodology Center, Penn State. http://methodology.psu.edu. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
- Wheaton, B., & Montazer, S. (2010). Stressors, stress, and distress. In T. L. Scheid & T. N. Brown (Eds.), A handbook for the study of mental health: Social contexts, theories, and systems (2nd ed., pp. 171–199). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar