Attachment insecurity predicts responses to an interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program
- 1.5k Downloads
The aim of this study was to examine the hypothesis that attachment insecurity is associated with poorer responses to interdisciplinary treatment for chronic pain. Patients (n = 235) admitted to a 4-week interdisciplinary rehabilitation program were recruited. At pre-treatment, participants completed a battery of questionnaires assessing adult attachment styles and dimensions, as well as pain intensity, disability, self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, and depressive symptoms. The latter measures were completed again at post-treatment. Nearly two-thirds of participants (65.5 %) reported having an insecure attachment style. Attachment insecurity was unrelated to pre- and post-treatment reports of pain intensity and pain-related disability, but was significantly associated with most other clinical variables at both time points. Regression analyses controlling for pre-treatment functioning indicated that attachment insecurity was associated with less improvement in pain catastrophizing, pain self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms. Further research is warranted to investigate the processes by which attachment characteristics influence patients’ responses to chronic pain rehabilitation.
KeywordsChronic pain Adult attachment Interdisciplinary Treatment outcomes Pain management Psychosocial
This research was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP: 93645) and the Centre for Rehabilitation Research and Development of The Ottawa Hospital Rehabilitation Centre.
Conflict of interest
John Kowal, Lachlan A. McWilliams, Katherine Péloquin, Keith G. Wilson, Peter R. Henderson, and Dean A. Fergusson all declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
- Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Collins, N. L., & Allard, L. M. (2001). Cognitive representations of attachment: The content and function of working models. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 60–85)., Interpersonal processes Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- International Association for the Study of Pain. (1995). Pain database questionnaire. Seattle: Author.Google Scholar
- Kowal, J., Wilson, K. G., Geck, C. M., Henderson, P. R., & D’Eon, J. L. (2011). Changes in perceived pain severity following interdisciplinary treatment for chronic pain. Pain Research & Management, 16, 451–456.Google Scholar
- Meredith, P. J., Strong, J., & Feeney, J. A. (2005). Evidence of a relationship between adult attachment variables and appraisals of chronic pain. Pain Research & Management, 10, 191–200.Google Scholar
- Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., et al. (2004). Patterns and universals of adult romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions: Are models of self and of other pancultural constructs? Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 35, 367–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C. (1993). Adult romantic attachment: Theory and evidence. In D. Perlman & W. Jones (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships—Volume 4 (pp. 29–70). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar