Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 153–159 | Cite as

Glycemic control among U.S. Hispanics/Latinos with diabetes from the HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study: Do structural and functional social support play a role?

  • Addie L. Fortmann
  • Scott C. Roesch
  • Frank J. Penedo
  • Carmen R. Isasi
  • Mercedes R. Carnethon
  • Leonor Corsino
  • Neil Schneiderman
  • Martha L. Daviglus
  • Yanping Teng
  • Aida Giachello
  • Franklyn GonzalezII
  • Linda C. Gallo
Article

Abstract

Social support is one potential source of health-related resiliency in Hispanics with diabetes. This study examined relationships of structural (i.e., social integration) and functional (i.e., perceived) social support with glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin; HbA1c) in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos Sociocultural Ancillary Study. This study included 766 men and women representing multiple Hispanic ethnic backgrounds, aged 18–74 years, with diagnosed diabetes who completed fasting blood draw, medication review, and measures of sociodemographic factors, medical history, structural support (Cohen Social Network Index), and functional support (Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-12). After adjusting for sociodemographic covariates and medication, a one standard deviation increase in functional support was related to an 0.18 % higher HbA1c (p = 0.04). A similar trend was observed for structural support; however, this effect was non-significant in adjusted models. Greater functional support was associated with poorer glycemic control in Hispanics.

Keywords

Hispanic Latino Diabetes Glycemic control Social support 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos was carried out as a collaborative study supported by contracts from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) to the University of North Carolina (N01-HC65233), University of Miami (N01-HC65234), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (N01-HC65235), Northwestern University (N01-HC65236), and San Diego State University (N01-HC65237). The following Institutes/Centers/Offices contribute to the HCHS/SOL through a transfer of funds to the NHLBI: National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Office of Dietary Supplements. The HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study was supported by grant 1 RC2 HL101649 from the NHLBI (Gallo/Penedo PIs). The authors thank the staff and participants of HCHS/SOL and the HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study for their important contributions.

Conflict of Interest

Authors Fortmann, Roesch, Penedo, Isasi, Carnethon, Corsino, Schneiderman, Daviglus, Teng, Giachello, Gonzalez, and Gallo have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

References

  1. American Diabetes Association. (2012). Standards of medical care in diabetes, 2012. Diabetes Care, 35, S11–S63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Diabetes Association. (2013a). Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 36, S67–S74. doi: 10.2337/dc13-S067 PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Diabetes Association. (2013b). Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2012. Diabetes Care, 36, 1033–1046. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2625 PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkman, L. F., Leo-Summers, L., & Horwitz, R. I. (1992). Emotional support and survival after myocardial infarction A prospective, population-based study of the elderly. Annals of Internal Medicine, 117, 1003–1009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brookings, J. B., & Bolton, B. (1988). Confirmatory factor analysis of the interpersonal support evaluation list. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 137–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caballero, A. E. (2011). Understanding the Hispanic/Latino patient. The American Journal of Medicine, 124, S10–S15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.018 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, J. A., Walker, R. J., Smalls, B. L., & Egede, L. E. (2012). Glucose control in diabetes: the impact of racial differences on monitoring and outcomes. Endocrine, 42, 471–482. doi: 10.1007/s12020-012-9744-6 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). National diabetes fact sheet: General information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2007. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). National diabetes fact sheet: National estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  10. Cheta, D.M., & Rusu, E. (2013). HbA1c and predicting diabetic complications. DiaFocus. http://www.diafocus.com/2013/01/22/hba1c-and-predicting-diabetic-complications/#. Retrieved 12/7/13.
  11. Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. The American Psychologist, 59, 676–684. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.676 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., Rabin, B. S., & Gwaltney, J. M., Jr. (1997). Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold. Journal of the American Medical Assocation, 277, 1940–1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Hoberman, H. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In Sarason Sarason (Ed.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 73–94). Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coyne, J. C., Rohrbaugh, M. J., Shoham, V., Sonnega, J. S., Nicklas, J. M., & Cranford, J. A. (2001). Prognostic importance of marital quality for survival of congestive heart failure. American Journal of Cardiology, 88, 526–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fortmann, A. L., Gallo, L. C., & Philis-Tsimikas, A. (2011). Glycemic control among Latinos with type 2 diabetes: The role of social-environmental support resources. Health Psychology, 30(3), 251–258. doi: 10.1037/a0022850 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallant, M. P. (2003). The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research. [Review]. Health Education & Behavior, 30, 170–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallegos-Carrillo, K., Garcia-Pena, C., Duran-Munoz, C. A., Flores, Y. N., & Salmeron, J. (2009). Relationship between social support and the physical and mental wellbeing of older Mexican adults with diabetes. Revista de Investigación Clínica, 61, 383–391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallo, L. C., Fortmann, A. L., Mccurley, J. L., Isasi, C. R., Penedo, F. J., Daviglus, M. L., et al. (2014). Associations of structural and functional social support with diabetes prevalence in U.S. Hispanics/Latinos: Results from the HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. doi: 10.1007/s10865-014-9588-z.
  19. Gallo, L. C., Penedo, F. J., Carnethon, M., Isasi, C. R., Sotres-Alvarez, D., Malcarne, V. L., et al. (2014). The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos Sociocultural Ancillary Study: Sample, design, and procedures. Ethnicity and Disease, 24(1), 77–83.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gallo, L. C., Penedo, F. J., Espinosa De Los Monteros, K., & Arguelles, W. (2009). Resiliency in the face of disadvantage: Do Hispanic cultural characteristics protect health outcomes? Journal of Personality, 77, 1707–1746. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00598.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gorman, B. K., & Sivaganesan, A. (2007). The role of social support and integration for understanding socioeconomic disparities in self-rated health and hypertension. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 958–975. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.017 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hermanns, N., Caputo, S., Dzida, G., Khunti, K., Meneghini, L. F., & Snoek, F. (2013). Screening, evaluation and management of depression in people with diabetes in primary care. Primary Care Diabetes, 7(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2012.11.002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IBM Corporation. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
  24. Ingram, M., Torres, E., Redondo, F., Bradford, G., Wang, C., & O’toole, M. L. (2007). The impact of promotoras on social support and glycemic control among members of a farmworker community on the US-Mexico border. The Diabetes Educator, 33, 172S–178S. doi: 10.1177/0145721707304170 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirk, J. K., Passmore, L. V., Bell, R. A., Narayan, K. M., D’agostino, R. B., Jr., Arcury, T. A., et al. (2008). Disparities in A1C levels between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care, 31(2), 240–246. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0382 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lavange, L. M., Kalsbeek, W. D., Sorlie, P. D., Avilès-Santa, L. M., Kaplan, R. C., Barnhart, J., et al. (2010). Sample design and cohort selection in the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos. Annals of Epidemiology, 20, 642–649. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.05.006 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lustman, P. J., Anderson, R. J., Freedland, K. E., De Groot, M., Carney, R. M., & Clouse, R. E. (2000). Depression and poor glycemic control: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Diabetes Care, 23(7), 934–942.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mainous, A. G., 3rd, Baker, R., Koopman, R. J., Saxena, S., Diaz, V. A., Everett, C. J., et al. (2007). Impact of the population at risk of diabetes on projections of diabetes burden in the United States: An epidemic on the way. Diabetologia, 50(5), 934–940. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0528-5 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marin, G. (1993). Influence of acculturation on familialism and self-identification among Hispanics. In M. E. Bernal & G. P. Knight (Eds.), Ethnic identify: Formation and transmission among Hispanics and other minorities (pp. 181–196). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  30. Marin, G., & Marin, B. V. (1991). Research with Hispanic populations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Mayberry, L. S., & Osborn, C. Y. (2012). Family support, medication adherence, and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 35(6), 1239–1245. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2103 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Merz, E. L., Roesch, S. C., Malcarne, V. L., Penedo, F. J., Llabre, M. M., Birnbaum-Weitzman, O., et al. (2014). Validation of Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-12 (ISEL-12) scores among English- and Spanish-Speaking Hispanics/Latinos from the HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 384–394. doi: 10.1037/a0035248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2006). Mplus. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
  34. Rees, C. A., Karter, A. J., & Young, B. A. (2010). Race/ethnicity, social support, and associations with diabetes self-care and clinical outcomes in NHANES. The Diabetes Educator, 36(3), 435–445. doi: 10.1177/0145721710364419 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosengren, A., Hawken, S., Ounpuu, S., Sliwa, K., Zubaid, M., Almahmeed, W. A., et al. (2004). Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and 13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case-control study. Lancet, 364, 953–962. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17019-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosland, A. M., Heisler, M., Choi, H. J., Silveira, M. J., & Piette, J. D. (2010). Family influences on self-management among functionally independent adults with diabetes or heart failure: Do family members hinder as much as they help? Chronic illness, 6, 22–33. doi: 10.1177/1742395309354608 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Samuel-Hodge, C. D., Cene, C. W., Corsino, L., Thomas, C., & Svetkey, L. P. (2013). Family diabetes matters: A view from the other side. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28, 428–435. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2230-2 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanchez-Burks, J., Nisbett, R. E., & Ybarra, O. (2000). Cultural styles, relational schemas, and prejudice against out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 174–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schollgen, I., Huxhold, O., Schuz, B., & Tesch-Romer, C. (2011). Resources for health: Differential effects of optimistic self-beliefs and social support according to socioeconomic status. Health Psychology, 30, 326–335. doi: 10.1037/a0022514 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, T. W., & Ruiz, J. M. (2002). Psychosocial influences on the development and course of coronary heart disease: Current status and implications for research and practice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 548–568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sorlie, P. D., Avilès-Santa, L. M., Wassertheil-Smoller, S., Kaplan, R. C., Daviglus, M. L., Giachello, A. L., et al. (2010). Design and Implementation of the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos. Annals of Epidemiology, 20, 629–641. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.03.015 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stratton, I. M., Adler, A. I., Neil, H. A., Matthews, D. R., Manley, S. E., Cull, C. A., et al. (2000). Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study. BMJ, 321(7258), 405–412.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thompson, J. R., Horton, C., & Flores, C. (2007). Advancing diabetes self-management in the Mexican American population: A community health worker model in a primary care setting. The Diabetes Educator, 33, 159S–165S. doi: 10.1177/0145721707304077 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tomaka, J., Thompson, S., & Palacios, R. (2006). The Relation of social isolation, loneliness, and social support to disease outcomes among the elderly. Journal of Aging and Health, 18, 359–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Viruell-Fuentes, E. A., & Schulz, A. J. (2009). Toward a dynamic conceptualization of social ties and context: Implications for understanding immigrant and Latino health. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2167–2175. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2008.158956 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Addie L. Fortmann
    • 1
  • Scott C. Roesch
    • 2
  • Frank J. Penedo
    • 3
  • Carmen R. Isasi
    • 4
  • Mercedes R. Carnethon
    • 5
  • Leonor Corsino
    • 6
  • Neil Schneiderman
    • 7
  • Martha L. Daviglus
    • 8
  • Yanping Teng
    • 9
  • Aida Giachello
    • 5
  • Franklyn GonzalezII
    • 9
  • Linda C. Gallo
    • 2
  1. 1.Scripps Whittier Diabetes InstituteScripps HealthSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologySan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthAlbert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUSA
  5. 5.Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  6. 6.Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of MedicineDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  7. 7.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA
  8. 8.Institute for Minority Health Research, Department of MedicineUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  9. 9.Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations