Socioeconomic status and health: education and income are independent and joint predictors of ambulatory blood pressure
- 1.7k Downloads
Epidemiological research suggests that different indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) such as income and education may have independent and/or interactive effects on health outcomes. In this study, we examined both simple and more complex associations (i.e., interactions) between different indicators of SES and ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) during daily life. Our sample consisted of 94 married couples who completed a one-day ABP protocol. Both income and education were independently related to systolic blood pressure and only income was significantly related to diastolic blood pressure. There were also statistical interactions such that individuals with high levels of both income and education evidenced the lowest ABP. Gender moderated these findings. Three-way interactions revealed that, in general, women appear to benefit from either indicator of SES, whereas men appear to benefit more from income. The findings are consistent with epidemiological research and suggest one important physiological mechanism by which income and education may have independent and interactive effects on health.
KeywordsIncome Education Gender effects Socioeconomic status Ambulatory blood pressure Health
This research was supported by NIH Grant # R01 HL68862 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, awarded to Bert N. Uchino.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Bowen, K. S., Birmingham, W., Uchino, B. N., Carlisle, M., Smith, T. W., & Light, K. C. (2012). Specific dimensions of perceived support and ambulatory blood pressure: Which support functions appear most beneficial and for whom? International Journal of Psychophysiology. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.03.004.
- Grewen, K., Girdler, S. S., West, S. G., Bragdon, E., Costello, N., & Light, K. C. (2000). Stable pessimistic attributions interact with socioeconomic status to influence blood pressure and vulnerability to hypertension. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 9, 905–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kamarck, T. W., Shiffman, S. M., Smithline, L., Goodie, J. L., Thompson, H. S., Ituarte, P. H. G., et al. (1998). The diary of ambulatory behavioral states: A new approach to the assessment of psychosocial influences on ambulatory cardiovascular activity. In D. S. Krantz & A. S. Baum (Eds.), Technology and methods in behavioral medicine. (pp. 163–193). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
- Services USDoHaH (2010). Healthy people 2010. In: Services USDoHaH (ed).Google Scholar
- Smith, T. W., Cundiff, J. M., & Uchino, B. N. (2012). Interpersonal motives and cardiovascular response: Mechanisms linking dominance and social status with cardiovascular disease. In R. A. Wright & G. H. E. Gendolla (Eds.), How motivation affects cardiovascular response: Mechanisms and applications (pp. 287–305). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Umberson, D., & Montez, J. K. (2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, S54–S66.Google Scholar