Adherence is a multi-dimensional construct in the POUNDS LOST trial
- 254 Downloads
Research on the conceptualization of adherence to treatment has not addressed a key question: Is adherence best defined as being a uni-dimensional or multi-dimensional behavioral construct? The primary aim of this study was to test which of these conceptual models best described adherence to a weight management program. This ancillary study was conducted as a part of the POUNDS LOST trial that tested the efficacy of four dietary macronutrient compositions for promoting weight loss. A sample of 811 overweight/obese adults was recruited across two clinical sites, and each participant was randomly assigned to one of four macronutrient prescriptions: (1) Low fat (20% of energy), average protein (15% of energy); (2) High fat (40%), average protein (15%); (3) Low fat (20%), high protein (25%); (4) High fat (40%), high protein (25%). Throughout the first 6 months of the study, a computer tracking system collected data on eight indicators of adherence. Computer tracking data from the initial 6 months of the intervention were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory analyses. Two factors (accounting for 66% of the variance) were identified and confirmed: (1) behavioral adherence and (2) dietary adherence. Behavioral adherence did not differ across the four interventions, but prescription of a high fat diet (vs. a low fat diet) was found to be associated with higher levels of dietary adherence. The findings of this study indicated that adherence to a weight management program was best conceptualized as being multi-dimensional, with two dimensions: behavioral and dietary adherence.
KeywordsAdherence Overweight Obesity Randomized controlled trial Lifestyle behavior modification
Supported by a cooperative agreement award HL073286 from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health; and NIH General Clinical Research Center grant RR-02635. This study was approved by the appropriate ethics committees and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.
- Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Evans, I. M. (1986). Response structure and the triple-response-mode concept. In R. O. Nelson & S. C. Hayes (Eds.), Conceptual foundations of behavioral assessment (pp. 131–155). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Haynes, R. B., McDonald, H., Garg, A. X., & Montague, P. (2002). Interventions for helping patients to follow prescriptions for medications. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.
- Levensky, E. R., & O’Donohue, W. T. (2006). Patient adherence and nonadherence to treatments. In W. T. O’Donohue & E. R. Levensky (Eds.), Promoting treatment adherence: A practical handbook for health care providers (pp. 1–14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- Leventhal, H. (1993). Theories of compliance, and turning necessities into preferences: Application to adolescent health action. In N. A. Krasnegor, L. H. Epstein, S. B. Johnson, & S. J. Yaffe (Eds.), Developmental aspects of health compliance behavior (pp. 91–124). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
- Nelson, R. O., & Hayes, S. C. (1986). Conceptual foundations of behavioral assessment. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
- Riekert, K. A. (2006). Integrating regimen adherence assessment into clinical practice. In W. T. O’Donohue & E. R. Levensky (Eds.), Promoting treatment adherence (pp. 17–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Agriculture. (1994–1996). Agricultural Research Service. Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Food Surveys Research Group (Beltsville, MD). Continuing survey of food intakes by individuals.Google Scholar