Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 225–235 | Cite as

Evaluation of mediators of change in the treatment of epilepsy with acceptance and commitment therapy

Article

Abstract

The present study examined the mediators of change accounting for outcomes of a previously published study on acceptance and commitment therapy for the self-management of epilepsy and its life restricting impact. Conducted with 27 poor South Africans, a 9-h ACT protocol that included seizure management methods was shown to greatly reduce epileptic seizures and to increase quality of life over the next year as compared to an attention placebo control. A series of bootstrapped non-parametric multiple mediator tests showed that pre to follow-up changes in: seizures, quality of life, and well-being outcomes were mediated to a degree by ACT process measures of epilepsy-related acceptance or defusion, values attainment, persistence in the face of barriers, or their combination. The results of this study contribute to the understanding of the contextual conditioning mechanisms at work for those suffering from epilepsy and may show that helping people live vital lives may also help to reduce seizures.

Keywords

Acceptance and commitment therapy Mediational analysis Epilepsy Values Acceptance Defusion Psychological flexibility South Africa 

References

  1. Alsaadi, T. M., & Vinter-Marquez, A. (2005). Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. American Family Physician, 72(5), 849–856.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amir, M., Marcelo, F., Herrman, H., et al. (2000). Reliability, validity and reproducibility of the WHOQOL.BREF in six countries. http://www.hrainc.net/pdf/ISOQOL_2000_Vancouver_BREF.pdf.
  3. Austin, J. K. (1989). Comparison of child adaptation to epilepsy and asthma. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 2, 139–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, F. W., & Bunce, D. (2000). Mediators of change in emotion-focused and problem focused worksite stress management interventions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 156–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummins, R. A. (1991). The comprehensive quality of life scale—Intellectual disability: An initial report. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 17, 259–264.Google Scholar
  8. Cummins, R. A. (1997). Assessing quality of life for people with disabilities. In R. I. Brown (Ed.), Quality of life for handicapped people (pp. 116–150). Cheltenham, England: Stanley Thomas.Google Scholar
  9. Dahl, J., Brorson, L. O., & Melin, L. (1992). Effects of a broad-spectrum behavioural medicine treatment program on children with refractory epileptic seizures: An 8 year follow-up. Epilepsia, 33(1), 98–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahl, J., Melin, L., Brorson, L. O, et al. (1985). Effects of a broad-spectrum behavior modification treatment program on children with refractory epileptic seizures, Epilepsia, 26(4), 303–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahl, J., Melin, L., & Lund, L. (1987). Effects of a contingent relaxation treatment program on adults with refractory epileptic seizures. Epilepsia, 28, 125–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahl, J. (1992). Epilepsy: A behavior medicine approach to assessment and treatment in children. Göttingen: Hogref & Huber.Google Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., et al. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 71–75.Google Scholar
  14. Forman, E. M., Hoffman, K. L., McGrath, K. B., et al. (2007). A comparison of acceptance- and control-based strategies for coping with food cravings: An analog study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2372–2386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forman, E. M., Herbert, J. D., Moitra, E., et al. (2007). A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. Behavior Modification, 31, 772–799.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fried, R., Rubin, S., Carton, R., et al. (1984). Behavioral control of intractable seizures: Self regulation of end tidal carbon dioxide. Psychosomatic Medicine, 46, 315–331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaudiano, B. A., & Herbert, J. D. (2006). Believability of hallucinations as a potential mediator of their frequency and associated distress in psychotic inpatients. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34, 497–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gifford, E. V., Kohlenberg, B. S., Hayes, S. C., et al. (2004). Acceptance theory-based treatment for smoking cessation: An initial trial of acceptance and commitment therapy. Behavior Therapy, 35, 689–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gregg, J. A., Callaghan, G. M., Hayes, S. C., et al. (2007). Improving diabetes self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(2), 336–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haut, S. R., Vouyiouklis, M., & Shinnar, S. (2003). Stress and epilepsy: A patient perception survey. Epilepsy and Behavior, 4(5), 511–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R., Korn, Z., et al. (1999). The impact of acceptance versus control rationales on pain tolerance. The Psychological Record, 49, 33–47.Google Scholar
  22. Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R., Roget, N., et al. (2004). The impact of acceptance and commitment training and multicultural training on the stigmatizing attitudes and professional burnout of substance abuse counselors. Behavior Therapy, 35, 821–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J., Bond, F., et al. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes, and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., Wilson, K. G., et al. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54, 553–578.Google Scholar
  26. Hitiris, N., Suratman, S., Kelly, K., et al. (2007). Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: A search for risk factors. Epilepsy and Behavior, 10, 138–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, E. K., Jones, J. E., Seidenberg, M., et al. (2004). The relative impact of anxiety, depression, and clinical seizure features on health-related qulity of life in epilepsy. Epilepsia, 45, 544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lambert, M. V., & Robertson, M. M. (1999). Depression in epilepsy: Etiology, phenomenology, and treatment. Epilepsia, 40, 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lappalainen, R., Lehtonen, T., Skarp, E., et al. (2007). The impact of CBT and ACT models using psychology trainee therapists: A preliminary controlled effectiveness trial. Behavior Modification, 31, 488–511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levitt, J. T., Brown, T. A., Orsillo, S. M., et al. (2004). The effects of acceptance versus suppression of emotion on subjective and psychophysiological response to carbon dioxide challenge in patients with panic disorder. Behavior Therapy, 35, 747–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lillis, J. (2007). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for the treatment of obesity-related stigma and sustained weight loss. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
  32. Lindsay, W., & Baty, F. (1986). Behavioral relaxation training: Exploration with adults who are mentally handicapped. Mental Handicap, 15, 159–162.Google Scholar
  33. Longmore, R. J., & Worrell, M. (2007). Do we need to challenge thoughts in cognitive behavior therapy? Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 173–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lundgren, T. (August 2006). Validation and reliability data of the Bull’s-Eye. Presentation at the second world conference on ACT/RFT. London.Google Scholar
  35. Lundgren, A. T., Dahl, J., Melin, L., et al. (2006). Evaluation of acceptance and commitment therapy for drug refractory epilepsy: A randomized controlled trial in South Africa. Epilepsia, 47, 2173–2179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., et al. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Masedoa, A. I., & Esteve. M. R. (2006). Effects of suppression, acceptance and spontaneous coping on pain tolerance, pain intensity and distress. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Masuda, A., Hayes, S. C., Sackett, C. F., et al. (2004). Cognitive defusion and self-relevant negative thoughts: Examining the impact of a ninety year old technique. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 477–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Montgomery, J., & Epsie, C. (1986). Behavioral management of hysterical pseudo seizures. Behavioral Psychotherapy, 143, 34–40.Google Scholar
  42. Newson, D., Goldstein, L., & Fitzpatrick, D. (1998). Fear of seizures: An investigation and treatment. Seizure, 7, 101–106.Google Scholar
  43. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater, & L.B. Synder (Eds.), The SAGE sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication reseach (pp. 13–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  45. Ramaratnam, S., Baker, G. A., & Goldstein, L. H. (2004). Psychological treatments for epilepsy. (Cochran Review). The Cochran Library, Issue 1. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Rosseau, A., Hermann, B., & Whitman, S. (1985). Effects of progressive relaxation on epilepsy: Analysis of a series of cases. Psychological Reports, 57, 1203–1212.Google Scholar
  47. Spector, S., Goldstein, L., Cull, C., et al. (1994). Precipitating and inhibiting epileptic seizures: A survey of adults with poorly controlled epilepsy. London: International League against Epilepsy.Google Scholar
  48. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology, 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  49. Tan, S., & Bruni, J. (1986). Cognitive-behavior therapy with adult patients with epilepsy: A controlled outcome study. Epilepsia, 27, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tomson, T., Beghi, E., Sundqvist, A., et al. (2004). Medical risks in epilepsy: A review with focus on physical injuries, mortality, traffic accidents and prevention. Epilepsy Research, 60, 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vowles, K. E., McNeil, D. W., Gross, R. T., et al. (2007). Effects of pain acceptance and pain control strategies on physical impairment in individuals with chronic low back pain. Behavior Therapy, 38, 412–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wolf, P. (2005). From precipitation to inhibition of seizures: Rationale of a therapeutic paradigm. Epilepsia, 46, 15–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. World Health Organization. (1996). WHOQOL-BREF: Introduction, administration and generic version of the assessment. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Programme on Mental Health.Google Scholar
  54. Zettle, R. D. (2003). Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) versus systematic desensitization in treatment of mathematics anxiety. The Psychological Record, 53, 197–215.Google Scholar
  55. Zettle, R. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1986). Dysfunctional control by client verbal behavior: The context of reason giving. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 4, 30–38.Google Scholar
  56. Zettle, R. D., & Rains, J. C. (1989). Group cognitive and contextual therapies in treatment of depression. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 438–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tobias Lundgren
    • 1
  • JoAnne Dahl
    • 1
  • Steven C. Hayes
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of UppsalaUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations