Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 505–519 | Cite as

Cardiovascular Reactivity During Positive and Negative Marital Interactions

  • Jill B. Nealey-Moore
  • Timothy W. Smith
  • Bert N. Uchino
  • Melissa W. Hawkins
  • Chrisana Olson-Cerny
Nealey-Moore

Abstract

Marriage reduces risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) but marital stress increases risk, perhaps through cardiovascular reactivity (CVR). However, previous studies have lacked controls necessary to conclude definitively that negative marital interactions evoke heightened CVR. To test the specific effects of marital stress on CVR, 114 couples engaged in positive, neutral, or negative interactions in which speaking and task involvement were controlled. Compared to positive and neutral conditions, negative discussions evoked larger increases in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac output, and larger decreases in peripheral resistance and pre-ejection period—similarly for men and women. Hence, CVR could contribute to the effects of marital difficulties on CVD. Previous evidence of sex differences in this effect might reflect factors other than simple reactivity to negative interactions.

Keywords

Cardiovascular reactivity Marital interaction Marital conflict Interpersonal circumplex Psychosocial risk Impedance cardiography 

References

  1. Allen, M. T., Stoney, C. M., Owens, J. F., & Matthews, K. A. (1993). Hemodynamic adjustments to laboratory stress: The influence of gender and personality. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 505–517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, B., Paquette, M., Szalai, J. P., Driver, H., Perger, T., Helmers, K., O’Kelly, B., & Tobe, S. (2000). The influence of marital adjustment on 3-year left ventricular mass and ambulatory blood pressure in mild hypertension. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160, 3453–3458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkman, L. F. (1995). The role of social relations in health promotion. Psychosomatic Medicine, 57, 245–254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernhardsen, C. S. (1975). Type I error rates when multiple comparisons follow a significant F test in AVOVA. Biometrics, 31, 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berntson, G. G., Cacioppo, J. T., & Quigley, K. S. (1995). The metrics of cardiac chronotropism: Biometric perspectives. Psychophysiology, 31, 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berntson, C. G., Quigley, K. S., Jang, J., & Boysen, S. T. (1990). An approach to artifact identification: Application to heart period data. Psychophysiology, 27, 586–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2007). Emotion and motivation. In: J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 581–607). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Broadwell, S. D., & Light, K. C. (1999). Family support and cardiovascular responses in married couples during conflict and other interactions. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 6, 40–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cacioppo, J. T., Uchino, B. N., & Bernston, G. G. (1994). Individual differences in the autonomic origins of heart rate reactivity: The psychometrics of respiratory sinus arrhythmia and pre-ejection period. Psychophysiology, 31, 412–419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, S., Kaplan, J. R., & Manuck, S. B. (1994). Social support and coronary heart disease: Underlying psychological and biological mechanisms. In: S. A. Shumaker & S. M. Czajkowski (Eds.), Social support and cardiovascular disease (pp. 195–122). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  13. Coyne, J. C., Rohrbaugh, M. J., Shoham, V., Sonnega, J. S., Nicklas, J. M., & Cranford, J. A. (2001). Prognostic importance of marital quality for survival of congestive heart failure. American Journal of Cardiology, 88, 526–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, M. C., Matthews, K. A., & Twamley, E. W. (1999). Is life more difficult on Mars or Venus? A meta-analytic review of sex differences in major and minor life events. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 83–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Denton, W. H., Burleson, B. R., Hobbs, B. V., Von Stein, M., & Rodriguez, C. P. (2001). Cardiovascular reactivity and initiate/avoid patterns of marital communication: A test of Gottman’s psychophysiologic model of marital interaction. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 401–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ewart, C. K., Taylor, C. B., Kraemer, H. C., & Agras, W. S. (1984). Reducing blood pressure reactivity during interpersonal conflict: Effects of marital communication training. Behavior Therapy, 15, 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ewart, C. K., Taylor, C. B., Kraemer, H. C., & Agras, W. S. (1991). High blood pressure and marital discord: Not being nasty matters more than being nice. Health Psychology, 10, 155–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (1999). Conflict in marriage: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 47–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fincham, F. D., & Linfield, K. J. (1997). A new look at marital quality: Can spouses feel positive and negative about their marriage? Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallo, L. C., Smith, T. W., & Kircher, J. C. (2000). Cardiovascular and electrodermal responses to support and provocation: Interpersonal methods in the study of psychophysiologic reactivity. Psychophysiology, 37, 289–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gallo, L. C., Troxel, W. M., Kuller, L. H., Sutton-Tyrrell, K., Edmundowicz, D., & Matthews, K. A. (2003). Marital status, marital quality, and atherosclerotic burden in postmenopausal women. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 952–962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Girdler, S. S., Turner, J. R., Sherwood, A., & Light, K. C. (1990). Gender differences in blood pressure control during a variety of behavioral stressors. Psychosomatic Medicine, 52, 571–591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gottman, J. M., Markman, H., & Notarious, C. (1977). The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jennings, J. R., Kamarck, T., Stewart, C., Eddy, M., & Johnson, P. (1992). Alternate cardiovascular baseline assessment techniques: Vanilla or resting baseline. Psychophysiology, 24, 474–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kamarck, T. W., Peterman, A. H., & Raynor, D. A. (1998). The effects of social environment on stress-related cardiovascular activation: Current findings, prospects, and implications. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 247–256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kenny, D. A. (1995). Design and analysis issues in dyadic research. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 164–184.Google Scholar
  29. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Glaser, R., Cacioppo, J. T., MacCallum, R. C., Snydersmith, M., Kim, C., & Malarkey, W. B. (1997). Marital conflict in older adults: Endocrinological and immunological correlates. Psychosomatic Medicine, 59, 339–349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Malarkey, W. B., Chee, M., Newton, T., Cacioppo, J. T., Mao, H.-Y., & Glaser, R. (1993). Negative behavior during marital conflict is associated with immunological down-regulation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 395–409.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology and psychotherapy. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Kiesler, D. J., Schmidt, J. A., & Wagner, C. C. (1997). A circumplex inventory of impact messages: An operational bridge between emotion and interpersonal behavior. In R. Plutchik & H. R. Conte (Eds.), Circumplex models of personality and emotions (pp. 221–224). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kop, W. J. (1999). Chronic and acute psychological risk factors for clinical manifestations of coronary artery disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61, 476–487.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lawler, K. A., Wilcox, Z. C., & Anderson, S. F. (1995). Gender differences in patterns of dynamic cardiovascular regulation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 57, 357–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Leopre, S. J. (1998). Problems and prospects for the social support—reactivity hypothesis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Litvack, D. A., Oberlander, T. F., Carney, L. H., & Saul, J. P. (1995). Time and frequency domain methods for heart rate variability analysis: A methodological comparison. Psychophysiology, 32, 492–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Llabre, M. M., Spitzer, S. B., Saab, P. G., Ironson, G. H., & Schneiderman, N. (1991). The reliability and specificity of delta versus residualized change as measures of cardiovascular reactivity to behavioral challenges. Psychophysiology, 28, 701–711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Margolin, G., Talovic, S., & Weinstein, C. D. (1983). Areas of change questionnaire: A practical approach to marital assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 920–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matthews, K. A., & Gump, B. B. (2002). Chronic work stress and marital dissolution increase risk of post-trial mortality in men from the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 309–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mattson, R. E., Paldino, D., & Johnson, M. D. (2007). The increased construct validity and clinical utility of assessing relationship quality using separate positive and negative dimensions. Psychological Assessment, 19, 146–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mayne, T. J., O’Leary, A., McCrady, B., Contrada, R., & Labouvie, E. (1997). The differential effects of acute marital distress on emotional, physiological and immune functions in maritally distressed men and women. Psychology and Health, 12, 277–288.Google Scholar
  43. Nealey, J. B., Smith, T. W., & Uchino, B. N. (2002). Cardiovascular responses to agentic and communal stressors in young women. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neuvo, Y., Cheng-Yu, D., & Mitra, S. (1984). Interpolated finite impulse response filters. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 32, 563–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Newton, T. L., & Sanford, J. M. (2003). Conflict structure moderates associations between cardiovascular reactivity and negative marital interaction. Health Psychology, 22, 270–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Orth-Gomer, K., Wamala, S. P., Horsten, M., Schenck-Gustafsson, K., Schneiderman, N., & Mittleman, M. A. (2000). Marital stress worsens prognosis in women with coronary heart disease: The Stockholm female coronary risk study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 3008–3014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pierce, G. R., Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1991). General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1028–1039.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robles, T. F., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2003). The physiology of marriage: Pathways to health. Physiology and Behavior, 79, 409–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schmidt, J. A., Wagner, C. C., & Kiesler, D. J. (1999). Psychometric and circumplex properties of the octant scale impact message inventory (IMI-C): A structural evaluation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sherwood, A., Allen, M. T., Fahrenberg, J., Kelsey, R. M., Lovallo, W. R., & van Doornen, L. J. P. (1990). Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography. Psychophysiology, 27, 1–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sherwood, A., Dolan, C. A., & Light, K. C. (1990). Hemodynamics of blood pressure responses during active and passive coping. Psychophysiology, 27, 656–668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Siegman, A. W., Dembroski, T. M., & Crump, D. (1992). Speech rate, loudness, and cardiovascular reactivity. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 519–523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith, T. W., Gallo, L. C., Goble, L., Ngu, L. Q., & Stark, K. A. (1998). Agency, communion, and cardiovascular reactivity during marital interaction. Health Psychology, 17, 537–545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith, T. W., Gallo, L. C., & Ruiz, J. M. (2003). Toward a social psychophysiology of cardiovascular reactivity: Interpersonal concepts and methods in the study of stress, coronary disease. In J. Suls & K. Wallston (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of health and illness (pp. 335–366). UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, T. W., Limon, J. P., Gallo, L. C., & Ngu, L. Q. (1996). Interpersonal control and cardiovascular reactivity: Goals, behavioral expression, and the moderating effects of sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1012–1024.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, T. W., Nealey, J. B., Kircher, J. C., & Limon, J. P. (1997). Social determinants of cardiovascular reactivity: Effects of incentive to exert influence and evaluative threat. Psychophysiology, 34, 65–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, T. W., Ruiz, J., & Uchino, B. N. (2000). Vigilance, active coping, and cardiovascular reactivity during social interaction in young men. Health Psychology, 19, 382–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith, T. W., Ruiz, J. M., & Uchino, B. N. (2004). Mental activation of supportive ties, hostility, and cardiovascular reactivity to laboratory stress in young men and women. Health Psychology, 23, 476–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Snyder, D. K., Heyman, R. E., & Haynes, S. N. (2005). Evidence-based approaches to assessing couple distress. Psychological Assessment, 17, 288–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Spielberger, C. D. (1980). Preliminary manual for the State-Trait Personality Inventory. Tampa: University of South Florida, Human Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  61. Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not flight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kelsey, R. M., & Leitten, C. L. (1993). Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 248–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Traupman, E., Smith, T. W., Uchino, B. N., Berg, C. A., Trobst, K. K., & Costa, P. T. (2007). Interpersonal circumplex descriptions of psychosocial risk factors for physical disease: Application to the domains of hostility, neuroticism, and marital adjustment (under review).Google Scholar
  64. Treiber, F. A., Kamarck, T., Schneiferman, N., Sheffield, D., Kapuku, G., & Taylor, T. (2003). Cardiovascular reactivity and development of preclinical and clinical disease states. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 46–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Uchino, B. N. (2004). Social support and physical health outcomes: Understanding the health consequences of our relationships. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Uchino, B. N., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1996). The relationship between social support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 488–531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wiggins, J. (1996). An informal history of the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wright, R. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2001). Effort determination of cardiovascular response: An integrative analysis with applications in social psychology. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 255–307). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jill B. Nealey-Moore
    • 1
  • Timothy W. Smith
    • 2
  • Bert N. Uchino
    • 2
  • Melissa W. Hawkins
    • 3
  • Chrisana Olson-Cerny
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Puget SoundTacomaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Utah Salt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.School of MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations