Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 30, Issue 5, pp 423–434 | Cite as

Does Distraction Facilitate Problem-focused Coping with Job Stress? A 1 year Longitudinal Study

Article

Abstract

This study examined the sole and combined effects of problem-focused coping and distraction on employee well-being (i.e., stress responses and job performance) using two-wave panel survey data with a 1-year time lag. Participants were 488 male employees, who worked for a construction machinery company in western Japan. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine whether distraction moderates the relationship of problem-focused coping with well-being. More use of problem-focused coping was negatively related to subsequent stress responses among those high in distraction. The combination of high problem-focused coping and high distraction was positively related to subsequent job performance, although it was limited only to the high job stress situation. Results suggest that the combination of high problem-focused coping and high distraction may lead to lower stress responses and better performance (but only in high job stress situations for performance) than the combination of high problem-focused coping and low distraction, at least for male blue-collar workers.

Keywords

Problem-focused coping Distraction Stress responses Performance Longitudinal study 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Aldwin, C. M. (1994). Stress, coping, and development – an integrative perspective. New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, S. P., Westbrook, R. A., & Challagalla, G. (2005). Good cope, bad cope: Adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies following a critical negative work event. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 792–798.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, S., Evans, G. W., Stokols, D., & Krantz, D. S. (1986). Behavior, health, and environmental stress. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, S., & Spacapan, S. (1978). The aftereffects of stress: An attentional interpretation. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 3, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Contrada, R. J., Glass, D. C., Krakoff, L. R., Krantz, D. S., Kehoe, K., Isecke, W., Collins, C., & Elting, E. (1982). Effects of control over aversive stimulation and Type A behavior on cardiovascular and plasma catecholamine responses. Psychophysiology, 19, 408–419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, C. L., Dewe, P. J., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (2001). Organizational stress. California: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Daniels, K. (1999). Coping and the job-demands-control-support model: An exploratory study. International Journal of Stress Management, 6, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daniels, K., & Guppy, A. (1994). Occupational stress, social support, job control, and psychological well-being. Human Relations, 47, 1523–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Jonge, J., Dormann, C., Janssen, P. P. M., Dollard, M. F., Landeweerd, J. A., & Nijhuis, F. J. N. (2001). Testing reciprocal relationships between job characteristics and psychological well-being: A cross-lagged structural equation model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Rijk, A. E., Le Blanc, P. M., Schaufeli, W. B., & De Jonge, J. (1998). Active coping and need for control as moderators of the job demand-control model: Effects on burn out. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71, 1–18.Google Scholar
  14. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). Spillover and crossover of exhaustion and life satisfaction among dual-earner parents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 266–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elfering, A., Grebner, S., Semmer, N. K., Kaiser-Freiburghaus, D., Ponte, S. L., & Witschi, I. (2005). Chronic job stressors and job control: Effects on event-related coping success and well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eriksen, H. R., Olff, M., & Ursin, H. (2000). Coping with subjective health problems in organizations. In P. Dewe, M. Leiter, & T. Cox (Eds.), Coping, health and organizations (pp. 34–51). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  17. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Abnormal and Psychology, 48, 150–170.Google Scholar
  19. Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. (2000). Stress, positive emotion, and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fritz, C., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Recovery, health, and job performance: Effects of weekend experiences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 187–199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaudreau, P., & Blondin, J. (2004). Differential associations of dispositional optimism and pessimism with coping, goal attainment, and emotional adjustment during sport competition. International Journal of Stress Management, 11, 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilligan, S. G., & Bower, G. H. (1985). Cognitive consequences of emotional arousal. In C. E. Izard, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior (pp. 547–588). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Glass, D. C., & Singer, J. E. (1972). Urban stress: Experiments on noise and social stressors. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gotlib, I. H., & Cane, D. B. (1989). Self-report assessment of depression and anxiety. In P. C. Kendall, & D. Watson, (Eds.), Anxiety and depression: Distinctive and overlapping features (pp. 131–169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hockey, G. R. J. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45, 73–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hurrell, J. J. Jr., Nelson, D. L., & Simmons, B. L. (1998). Measuring job stressors and strains: Where we have been, where we are, and where we need to go. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 368–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ingledew, D. K., Hardy, L., & Cooper, C. L. (1997). Do resources bolster coping and does coping buffer stress? An organizational study with longitudinal aspect and control for negative affectivity. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2, 118–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kageyama, T., Kobayashi, T., Kawashima, M., & Kanamaru, Y. (2004). Development of the Brief Scales for Coping Profiles (BSCP) for workers: Basic information about its reliability and validity. Sangyo Eiseigatu Zasshi, 46, 103–114 (in Japanese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  31. Kessler, R. C., Barber, C., Beck, A., Berglund, P., Cleary, P. D., McKenas, D., Pronk, N., Simon, G., Stang, P., Ustun, T. B., & Wang, P. (2003). The world health organization health and work performance questionnaire (HPQ). Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45, 156–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kristenson, M., Eriksen, H. R., Sluiter, J. K., Starke, D., & Ursin, H. (2004). Psychobiological mechanisms of socioeconomic differences in health. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 1511–1522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Latack, J. C., & Havlovic, S. J. (1992). Coping with job stress: A conceptual evaluation framework for coping measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 479–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 234–247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Lee-Baggley, D., Preece, M., & DeLongis, A. (2005). Coping with interpersonal stress: Role of big five traits. Journal of Personality, 73, 1141–1180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Livneh, H., Wilson, L. M., Duchesneau, A., & Antonak, R. F. (2001). Psychosocial adaptation to epilepsy: The role of coping strategies. Epilepsy and Behavior, 2, 533–544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 825–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1988). Personality moderates the interaction of mood and cognition. In K. Fiedler, & J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition and social behavior (pp. 87–99). Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  42. Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. D. Drenth, & H. Thierry (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology: Work psychology, Vol. 2, (pp. 5–33). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  43. Moyle, P. (1995). The role of negative affectivity in the stress process: Tests of alternative models. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 647–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1993). Effect of rumination and distraction on naturally occurring depressed mood. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 561–570.Google Scholar
  46. Parkes, K. R. (1991). Locus of control as moderator: An explanation for additive versus interactive findings in the demand-discretion model of work stress? British Journal of Psychology, 82, 291–312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pascual, E., Perez-Jover, V., Mirambell, E., Ivanez, G., & Terol, M. C. (2003). Job conditions, coping and wellness/health outcomes in Spanish secondary school teachers. Psychology and Health, 18, 511–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Penley, J. A., Tomaka, J., & Wiebe, J. S. (2002). The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 551–603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reid, G. J., Gilbert, C. A., & McGrath, P. J. (1998). The pain coping questionnaire: Preliminary validation. Pain, 76, 83–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96, 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shimazu, A., De Jonge, J., & Irimajiri, H. (in press). Lagged effects of active coping within the demand-control model: A three-wave panel study among Japanese employees. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. Google Scholar
  53. Shimazu, A., & Kosugi, S. (2003). Job stressor, coping, and psychological distress among Japanese employees: Interplay between active and non-active coping. Work and Stress, 17, 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shimomitsu, T., Yokoyama, K., Ono, Y., Maruta, T., & Tanigawa, T. (1998). Development of a novel brief job stress questionnaire. In S. Kato (Ed.), Report of the research grant for the prevention of work-related diseases from the Ministry of Labour (pp. 107–115). Tokyo, Ministry of Labour (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  55. Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 216–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sluiter, J. K., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., Meijman, T. F., & Van der Beek, A. J. (2000). Reactivity and recovery from different types of work measured by catecholamines and cortisol: A systematic overview. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57, 298–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spector, P. E., Zapf, D., Chen, P. Y., & Frese, M. (2000). Why negative affectivity should not be controlled in job stress research: Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stanton, A. L., Kirk, S. B., Cameron, C. L., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2000). Coping through emotional approach: Scale construction and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1150–1169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Suls, J., & Fletcher, B. (1985). The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 4, 247–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 2–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taris, T. W., & Kompier, M. (2003). Challenges in longitudinal designs in occupational health psychology. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 29, 1–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Todd, M., Tennen, H., Carney, M. A., Armeli, S., & Affleck, G. (2004). Do we know how we cope? Relating daily coping reports to global and time-limited retrospective assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 310–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tsutsumi, A., Takao, S., Mineyama, S., Nishiuchi, K., Komatsu, H., & Kawakami, N. (2005). Effects of a supervisory education for positive mental health in the workplace: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Occupational Health, 47, 226–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ursin, H. (1980). Personality, activation and somatic health: A new psychosomatic theory. In S. Levine, & H. Ursin (Eds.), Coping and health (pp. 259–279). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  65. Van Vegchel, N., De Jonge, J., & Landsbergis, P. A. (2005). Occupational stress in (inter)action: The interplay between job demands and job resources. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 535–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vitaliano, P. P., DeWolfe, D. J., Maiuro, R. D., Russo, J., & Katon, W. (1990). Appraised changeability of a stressor as a modifier of the relationship between coping and depression: A test of the hypothesis of fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 582–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Westman, M., & Eden, D. (1997). Effects of a respite from work on burnout: Vacation relief and fade-out. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 516–527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Westman, M., & Etzion, D. (2001). The impact of vacation and job stress on burnout and absenteeism. Psychology and Health, 16, 595–606.Google Scholar
  69. Zakowski, S. G., Hall, M. H., Klein, L. C., & Baum, A. (2001). Appraised control, coping, and stress in a community sample: A test of the Goodness-of-fit hypothesis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 23, 158–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mental HealthThe University of Tokyo Graduate School of MedicineTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Social and Organizational PsychologyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations