Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 477–485

Breast Cancer-Specific Intrusions are Associated with Increased Cortisol Responses to Daily Life Stressors in Healthy Women Without Personal or Family Histories of Breast Cancer

  • Lucia Dettenborn
  • Gary D. James
  • Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir
  • Guy H. Montgomery
  • Dana H. Bovbjerg
Article

Studies indicate that women fear breast cancer more than any other disease and that women’s levels of breast cancer-specific intrusions are related to their perceived risk of breast cancer. Here, we explore possible biological consequences of higher breast cancer risk perceptions and intrusions in healthy women without personal or family histories of the disease. We hypothesized that women with higher perceived risk would have more intrusions about breast cancer, which would constitute a background stressor sufficient to increase hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) responsivity to daily stress. HPA responses to an ordinary life stressor (work) were assessed in 141 employed women (age=37.2±9.2) without personal or family histories of breast cancer. Urinary cortisol excretion rates were assessed with timed sample collections at work, home, and during sleep. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant Group by Time interaction with higher work cortisol levels in women with breast cancer-specific intrusions compared to women without intrusions (p < 0.02). Regression analyses revealed a significant association between risk perceptions and intrusions (p < 0.001). Regression analysis with intrusions and risk perceptions predicting work cortisol indicated a significant contribution of intrusions (p < 0.04), but not risk perceptions (p=0.53). Overestimation of breast cancer risk is associated with higher levels of breast cancer-specific intrusions that can result in increased cortisol responsivity to daily stressors. This heightened responsivity could have long-term negative health implications.

KEY WORDS:

breast cancer cortisol distress intrusions 

REFERENCES

  1. Cancer Facts and Figures 2005 (2005). American Cancer Society.Google Scholar
  2. Baum, M. (2000). Epidemiology versus scare mongering: The case for the humane interpretation of statistics and breast cancer. Breast J. 6: 331–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke, W., Olsen, A. H., Pinsky, L. E., Reynolds, S. E., and Press, N. A. (2001). Misleading presentation of breast cancer in popular magazines. Eff. Clin. Pract. 4: 58–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Claus, E. B., Risch, N., and Thompson, W. D. (1994). Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction. Cancer 73: 643–651.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Derogatis, L. R. and Spencer, P. (1982). The brief symptom inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual-I. Baltimore: Copyrighted manuscript.Google Scholar
  6. Dettenborn, L., James, G. D., van Berge-Landry, H., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Montgomery, G. H., and Bovbjerg, D. H. (2005). Heightened cortisol responses to daily stress in working women at familial risk for breast cancer. Biol. Psychol. 69(2): 167–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickerson, S. S., and Kemeny, M. E. (2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychol. Bull. 130: 355–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dudok deWit, A. C., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Passchier, J., Niermeijer, M. F., and Tibben, A. (1998). Course of distress experienced by persons at risk for an autosomal dominant inheritable disorder participating in a predictive testing program: An explorative study. Rotterdam/Leiden genetics workgroup. Psychosom. Med. 60: 543–549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Elenkov, I. J., and Chrousos, G. P. (1999). Stress, cytokine patterns and susceptibility to disease. Baillieres Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 13: 583–595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erblich, J., Bovbjerg, D. H., and Valdimarsdottir, H. B. (2000). Looking forward and back: Distress among women at familial risk for breast cancer. Ann. Behav. Med. 22: 53–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erblich, J., Montgomery, G. H., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Cloitre, M., and Bovbjerg, D. H. (2003). Biased cognitive processing of cancer-related information among women with family histories of breast cancer: Evidence from a cancer stroop task. Health Psychol. 22: 235–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eskandari, F., and Sternberg, E. M. (2002). Neural-immune interactions in health and disease. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci. 966: 20–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaab, J., Blattler, N., Menzi, T., Pabst, B., Stoyer, S., and Ehlert, U. (2003). Randomized controlled evaluation of the effects of cognitive-behavioral stress management on cortisol responses to acute stress in healthy subjects. Psychoneuroendocrinology 28: 767–779.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gail, M. H., Brinton, L. A., Byar, D. P., Corle, D. K., Green, S. B., Schairer, C. et al. (1989). Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 81: 1879–1886.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gump, B. B. and Matthews, K. A. (1999). Do background stressors influence reactivity to and recovery from acute stressors? J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 29(3): 469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hammerfald, K., Eberle, C., Grau, M., Kinsperger, A., Zimmermann, A., Ehlert, U. et al. (2006). Persistent effects of cognitive-behavioral stress management on cortisol responses to acute stress in healthy subjects—A randomized controlled trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology 31: 333–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holleman, F., Endert, E., Prummel, M. F., van Vessem-Timmermans, M., Wiersinga, W. M., and Fliers, E. (2005). Evaluation of endocrine tests. B: Screening for hypercortisolism. Neth. J. Med. 63: 348–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., and Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of event scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosom. Med. 41: 209–218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huizinga, G. A., Visser, A., Van Der Graaf, W. T., Hoekstra, H. J., Klip, E. C., Pras, E. et al. (2005). Stress response symptoms in adolescent and young adult children of parents diagnosed with cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 41: 288–295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. James, G. D., Berge-Landry, H. H., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Montgomery, G. H., and Bovbjerg, D. H. (2004). Urinary catecholamine levels in daily life are elevated in women at familial risk of breast cancer. Psychoneuroendocrinology 29: 831–838.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. James, G. D. and Brown, D. E. (1997). The biological stress response and lifestyle: Catecholamines and blood pressure. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 26: 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. James, G. D., Schlussel, Y. R., and Pickering, T. G. (1993). The association between daily blood pressure and catecholamine variability in normotensive working women. Psychosom. Med. 55: 55–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Joseph, S. (2000). Psychometric evaluation of Horowitz’s impact of event scale: A review. J. Trauma. Stress. 13: 101–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kash, K. M., Holland, J. C., Halper, M. S., and Miller, D. G. (1992). Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 84: 24–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Katapodi, M. C., Lee, K. A., Facione, N. C., and Dodd, M. J. (2004). Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: A meta-analytic review. Prev. Med. 38: 388–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lerman, C., Daly, M., Sands, C., Balshem, A., Lustbader, E., Heggan, T. et al. (1993). Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85: 1074–1080.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lipkus, I. M., Kuchibhatla, M., McBride, C. M., Bosworth, H. B., Pollak, K. I., Siegler, I. C. et al. (2000). Relationships among breast cancer perceived absolute risk, comparative risk, and worries. Cancer Epidem. Biomar. Prev. 9: 973– 975.Google Scholar
  28. Lloyd, S., Watson, M., Waites, B., Meyer, L., Eeles, R., Ebbs, S. et al. (1996). Familial breast cancer: A controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. Br. J. Cancer 74: 482–487.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lutgendorf, S. K., Reimer, T. T., Schlechte, J., and Rubenstein, L. M. (2001). Illness episodes and cortisol in healthy older adults during a life transition. Ann. Behav. Med. 23: 166–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matthews, K. A., Gump, B. B., and Owens, J. F. (2001). Chronic stress influences cardiovascular and neuroendocrine responses during acute stress and recovery, especially in men. Health Psychol. 20: 403–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McEwen, B. S. (2000). The neurobiology of stress: From serendipity to clinical relevance. Brain Res. 886: 172–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McEwen, B. S., and Seeman, T. (1999). Protective and damaging effects of mediators of stress. Elaborating and testing the concepts of allostasis and allostatic load. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci. 896: 30–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGregor, B. A., Bowen, D. J., Ankerst, D. P., Andersen, M. R., Yasui, Y., and McTiernan, A. (2004). Optimism, perceived risk of breast cancer, and cancer worry among a community-based sample of women. Health Psychol. 23: 339–344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Montgomery, G. H., Erblich, J., DiLorenzo, T., and Bovbjerg, D. H. (2003). Family and friends with disease: Their impact on perceived risk. Prev. Med. 37: 242–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olson, J. S. (2002). Bathsheba′s Breast: Women, Cancer, and History, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
  36. Parkin, D. M., Bray, F., Ferlay, J., and Pisani, P. (2005). Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J. Clin. 55: 74–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Polk, D. E., Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., and Kirschbaum, C. (2005). State and trait affect as predictors of salivary cortisol in healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology 30: 261–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spittle, M. and Morgan, D. (1999). Women remain confused about breast cancer. BMJ 318: 600.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sundin, E. C. and Horowitz, M. J. (2003). Horowitz’s impact of event scale evaluation of 20 years of use. Psychosom. Med. 65: 870–876.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thewes, B., Meiser, B., and Hickie, I. B. (2001). Psychometric properties of the impact of event scale amongst women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer. Psychooncology 10: 459–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Bovbjerg, D. H., Kash, K. M., Holland, J. C., Osborne, M. P., and Miller, D. G. (1995). Psychological distress in women with a familial risk of breast cancer. Psychooncology 4: 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wear, D. (1993). Your breasts sliced off: Literary images of breast cancer. Women Health 20: 81–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zakowski, S. G., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Bovbjerg, D. H., Borgen, P., Holland, J., Kash, K. et al. (1997). Predictors of intrusive thoughts and avoidance in women with family histories of breast cancer. Ann. Behav. Med. 19: 362– 369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zakowski, S. G., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Bovbjerg, D. H., Borgen, P., Holland, J., Kash, K. et al. (1998). Predictors of intrusive thoughts and avoidance in women with family histories of breast cancer. Ann. Behav. Med. 19: 362–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucia Dettenborn
    • 1
  • Gary D. James
    • 2
  • Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir
    • 1
  • Guy H. Montgomery
    • 1
  • Dana H. Bovbjerg
    • 1
  1. 1.Biobehavioral Medicine Program, Department of Oncological SciencesMount Sinai School of MedicineNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Primary Preventative Health Care and Decker School of NursingBinghamton University, State University of New YorkBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations