Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 313–323 | Cite as

Self-Blame and Distress Among Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer

  • Kymberley K. Bennett
  • Bruce E. Compas
  • Ellen Beckjord
  • Judith G. Glinder
Original Article

This study examined relations between behavioral and characterological self-blame attributions for breast cancer and psychological distress in the year following a diagnosis. One hundred fifteen women with newly diagnosed breast cancer participated. First, we predicted that both forms of self-blame would be associated with distress shortly after diagnosis (i.e., at 4 months). Second, we predicted that only characterological self-blame would be related to distress at 7 and 12 months post-diagnosis because behavioral self-blame would enhance perceptions of control, thereby protecting against distress. Results supported the first hypothesis; both forms of self-blame were related to symptoms of anxiety and depression at 4 months post-diagnosis. Findings did not support the second hypothesis because both forms of self-blame continued to be related to distress at 7 and 12 months post-diagnosis. Furthermore, perceptions of control did not mediate the self-blame/distress relation. Implications for social cognitive processes in adaptation to breast cancer are discussed.

KEY WORDS

self-blame attributions breast cancer psychological distress 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by grant R01CA67936 from the National Cancer Institute to Bruce E. Compas, and preparation of this manuscript was supported by NIMH Training Grant T32-MH18921 and NICHD Grant P30HD15052 to Vanderbilt University.

REFERENCES

  1. Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., and Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. J. Abnor. Psychol. 87: 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51: 1173–1182. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, A. T., and Steer, R. A. (1990). Beck Anxiety Inventory Manual, Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., and Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory Manual (2nd edn.). The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1983). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edn.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  6. Compas, B. E., Stoll, M. F., Thomsen, A. H., Oppedisano, G., Epping-Jordan, J. E., and Krag, D. N. (1999). Adjustment to breast cancer: Age-related differences in coping and emotional distress. Breast Can. Res. Treat. 54: 199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glinder, J., Beckjord, E., Langrock, A., and Compas, B. E. (2004). Perceived Control and Adjustment to Breast Cancer. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  8. Glinder, J. G., and Compas, B. E. (1999). Self-blame attributions in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: A prospective study of psychological adjustment. Health Psychol. 18: 475–481.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gotay, C. C. (1985). Why me? Attributions and adjustment by cancer patients and their mates at two stages in the disease process. Soc. Sci. Med. 20: 825–831.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Houldin, A. D., Jacobsen, B., and Lowery, B. J. (1996). Self-blame and adjustment to breast cancer. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 23: 75–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1979). Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: Inquiries into depression and rape. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 37: 1798–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Janoff-Bulman, R., and Wortman, C. B. (1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the “real world”: Severe accident victims react to their lot. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 35: 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lazarus, R. S., and Folkman, S. (1986). Cognitive theories of stress and the issue of circularity, In Appley, M. H., and Trumbull, R. (Eds.), Dynamics of Stress: Physiological, Psychological, and Social Perspectives. The Plenum Series on Stress and Coping, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 63–80.Google Scholar
  15. Lowery, B. J., Jacobsen, B. S., and DuCette, J. (1993). Causal attribution, control, and adjustment to breast cancer. J. Psychosoc. Oncol. 10: 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malcarne, V. L., Compas, B. E., Epping-Jordan, J. E., and Howell, D. C. (1995). Cognitive factors in adjustment to cancer: Attributions of self-blame and perceptions of control. J. Behav. Med. 18: 401–417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Newsom, J. T., Knapp, J. E., and Schulz, R. (1996). Longitudinal analysis of specific domains of internal control and depressive symptoms in patients with recurrent cancer. Health Psychol. 15: 323–331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith, C. A., Haynes, K. N., Lazarus, R. S., and Pope, L. K. (1993). In search of the “hot” cognitions: Attributions, appraisals, and their relation to emotion. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 65: 916–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith, C. A., and Kirby, L. D. (2001). Affect and cognition appraisal processes. In Forgas J. P. (Ed.), Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 75–92.Google Scholar
  20. Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. Am. Psychol. 38: 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor, S. E., Lichtman, R. R., and Wood, J. V. (1984). Attributions, beliefs about control, and adjustment to breast cancer. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 46: 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Timko, C., and Janoff-Bulman, R. (1985). Attributions, vulnerability, and psychological adjustment: The case of breast cancer. Health Psychol. 4: 521–544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kymberley K. Bennett
    • 1
  • Bruce E. Compas
    • 2
  • Ellen Beckjord
    • 3
  • Judith G. Glinder
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyIndiana State UniversityTerre HauteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and Human DevelopmentVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  3. 3.The Cancer Prevention Fellowship ProgramDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VermontVermontUSA

Personalised recommendations