Using Remote Delivery to Train Parents in Video Analysis Procedures

  • Kristi L. MorinEmail author
  • Kimberly J. Vannest
  • Ee Rea Hong
  • April Haas
  • Sarah A. Nagro
  • Jennifer B. Ganz
  • Courtney Lavadia
Original Paper


Video analysis interventions that incorporate self-monitoring procedures may be an effective method for training parents; however, prior research with parents has been limited to in-person training. Using remote delivery to deliver parent training has the potential to increase accessibility. This study used distance technology to train parents on the use of video analysis procedures to increase self-selected instructional practices. Parents used goal setting, self-graphing, and reflection to self-monitor their use of instructional practices. Results from a changing criterion and two multiple-baseline designs indicated that video analysis was effective for changing parents’ instructional practices and that the effects generalized to a second target behavior and maintained in the absence of intervention. Additionally, results from a social validity survey indicated that parents found the intervention acceptable and feasible.


Distance technology Telehealth Coaching Parents Praise 



The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, through Grant R324B160038 awarded to UNC-Chapel Hill and by the Office of Special Education Programs, US Department of Education, through Grant H325D110046 awarded to Texas A&M University. The opinions expressed represent those of the authors and do not represent those of the US Department of Education.


  1. Alexander, M., Williams, N. A., & Nelson, K. L. (2012). When you can’t get there: Using video self-monitoring as a tool for changing the behaviors of pre-service teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly,31, 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bearss, K., Burrell, T. L., Challa, S. A., Postorino, V., Gillespie, S. E., Crooks, C., et al. (2018). Feasibility of parent training via telehealth for children with autism spectrum disorder and disruptive behavior: A demonstration pilot. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,48, 1020–1030. Scholar
  3. Briesch, A. M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2009). Review and analysis of literature on self-management interventions to promote appropriate classroom behaviors (1988–2008). School Psychology Quarterly,24, 106–118. Scholar
  4. Capizzi, A. M., Wehby, J. H., & Sandmel, K. N. (2010). Enhancing mentoring of teacher candidates through consultative feedback and self-evaluation of instructional delivery. Teacher Education and Special Education,22, 191–212. Scholar
  5. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied Behavior Analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  6. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Dallery, J., & Raiff, B. R. (2014). Optimizing behavioral health interventions with single-case designs: From development to dissemination. Translational Behavioral Medicine,4, 290–303. Scholar
  8. Davis, J. L., Mason, B. A., Davis, H. S., Mason, R. A., & Crutchfield, S. A. (2016). Self-monitoring interventions for students with ASD: A meta-analysis of school-based research. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,3, 196–208. Scholar
  9. Ganz, J. B., & Sigafoos, J. (2005). Self-monitoring: Are young adults with MR and autism able to utilize cognitive strategies independently? Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities,40, 24–33.Google Scholar
  10. Hager, K. D. (2012). Self-monitoring as a strategy to increase student teachers’ use of effective teaching practices. Rural Special Education Quarterly,31, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartmann, D. P., & Hall, R. V. (1976). The changing criterion design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,9, 527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvard College. (2015). Teacher video selfie: A self-guided module for analyzing videos of your own instruction. Best Foot Forward Project. Retrieved from
  13. Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research,66, 99–136. Scholar
  14. Hayes, S. C., & Cavior, N. (1977). Multiple tracking and the reactivity of self-monitoring. Behavior Therapy,8, 819–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hitchcock, J. H., Nastasi, B. K., & Summerville, M. (2010). Single-case designs and qualitative methods applying a mixed methods research perspective. Mid-Western Educational Researcher,23(2), 49–58.Google Scholar
  16. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.Google Scholar
  17. Ingersoll, B., Shannon, K., Berger, N., Pickard, K., & Holtz, B. (2017). Self-directed telehealth parent-mediated intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder: Examination of the potential reach and utilization in community settings. Journal of Medical Internet Research. Scholar
  18. Ingersoll, B., Wainer, A. L., Berger, N. I., Pickard, K. E., & Bonter, N. (2016). Comparison of a self-directed and therapist-assisted telehealth parent-mediated intervention for children with ASD: A pilot RCT. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,46, 2275–2284. Scholar
  19. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  21. Kjobli, J., Hukkelberg, S., & Ogden, T. (2013). A randomized trial of group parent training: Reducing child conduct problems in real-world settings. Behaviour Research and Therapy,51, 113–121. Scholar
  22. Molías, L. M., Ranilla, J. C., & Cervera, M. G. (2017). Pre-service Physical Education Teachers’ self -management ability: A training experience in 3D simulation environments (La competencia de autogestión de los futuros maestros de Educación Física: una experiencia formativa en entornos de simulación 3D). Retos,32, 30–34.Google Scholar
  23. Morin, K. L., Ganz, J. B., Vannest, K. J., Haas, A. N., Nagro, S. A., Peltier, C. J., et al. (2019). A systematic review of single-case research on video analysis as professional development for special educators. Journal of Special Education,53, 3–14. Scholar
  24. Nagro, S. A. (2016, March). Video analysis techniques for the reflective practitioner. New Times Division for Learning Disabilities Newsletter. Retrieved from
  25. Nagro, S. A., & Cornelius, K. E. (2013). Evaluating the evidence base of video analysis: A special education teacher development tool. Teacher Education and Special Education,36, 312–329. Scholar
  26. O’Connor, T. G., Matias, C., Futh, A., Tantam, G., & Scott, S. (2013). Social learning theory parenting intervention promotes attachment-based caregiving in young children: Randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology,42, 358–370. Scholar
  27. Rankin, J. L., & Reid, R. (1995). The SM rap—Or, here’s the rap on self-monitoring. Intervention in School and Clinic,30, 181–188. Scholar
  28. Reid, R., Trout, A. L., & Schartz, M. (2005). Self-regulation interventions for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Exceptional Children,71, 361–377.Google Scholar
  29. Sanders, M. R. (1982). The generalization of parent responding to community settings: The effects of instructions, plus feedback, and self-management training. Behavioural Psychotherapy,10, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sanders, M. R., & Glynn, T. (1981). Training parents in behavioral self-management: An analysis of generalization and maintenance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,14, 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246. Scholar
  32. Tripp, T. R., & Rich, P. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education,28, 728–739. Scholar
  33. Vismara, L. A., McCormick, C. E. B., Wagner, A. L., Monlux, K., Nadhan, A., & Young, G. S. (2016). Telehealth parent training in the Early Start Denver Model: Results from a randomized controlled study. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationLehigh UniversityBethlehemUSA
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.Division of Special Education and disAbility ResearchGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  4. 4.Department of Special Education, College of EducationBaekseok UniversityCheonan-siKorea

Personalised recommendations