Advertisement

Comparing Functional Behavior Assessment-Based Interventions and Non-functional Behavior Assessment-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Methodological Quality of Studies

  • Yunji JeongEmail author
  • Susan R. Copeland
Original Paper

Abstract

This review compared the effectiveness of functional behavior assessment-based interventions (FBAI) versus non-functional behavior assessment-based interventions (NFBAI) through an examination of 24 single-case design (SCD) studies that directly compared the effects of these intervention approaches. This review also systematically examined the quality of these studies. All of the reviewed studies reported relative effectiveness of FBAI over NFBAI in reducing problem behaviors, showing a higher percentage of behavior reduction in FBAI than NFBAI conditions. None of the reviewed studies met all of the What Works Clearinghouse Design Standards for SCD (Kratochwill et al. in Single-case designs technical documentation, 2010). We discussed methods of comparing the effects of FBAI versus NFBAI and made methodological suggestions for future research in this area.

Keywords

Functional behavior assessment Function-based Quality of research 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

Articles marked with a * were the studies included in the review

  1. *Addison, L. R., Piazza, C. C., Patel, M. R., Bachmeyer, M. H., Rivas, K. M., Milnes, S. M., et al. (2012). A comparison of sensory integrative and behavioral therapies a treatment for pediatric feeding disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(3), 455–471.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-455.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1987). Some still-current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20(4), 313–327.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bambara, L. M., Goh, A., Kern, L., & Caskie, G. (2012). Perceived barriers and enablers to implementing individualized positive behavior interventions and supports in school settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(4), 228–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bambara, L. M., Nonnemacher, S., & Kern, L. (2009). Sustaining school-based individualized positive behavior support: Perceived barriers and enablers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11(3), 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2014). Professional and ethical compliance code for behavior analysts. Retrieved from 16 November 2017, from http://bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/160321-compliance-code-english.pdf.
  6. *Bellone, K. M., Dufrene, B. A., Tingstrom, D. H., Olmi, D. J., & Barry, C. (2014). Relative efficacy of behavioral interventions in preschool children attending head start. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23(3), 378–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bormann, I. (2012). DigitizeIt (Version 2.2) [Computer software]. Retrieved 24 December 2018, from http://www.digitizeit.de.
  8. *Briere, D. E. I., & Simonsen, B. (2011). Self-monitoring interventions for at-risk middle school students: The importance of considering function. Behavioral Disorders, 36(2), 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. *Campbell, A., & Anderson, C. M. (2008). Enhancing effects of check-in/check-out with function-based support. Behavioral Disorders, 33(4), 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18(2), 111–126.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. *Carter, D. R., & Horner, R. H. (2007). Adding functional behavioral assessment to first step to success: A case study. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(4), 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. *Carter, D. R., & Horner, R. H. (2009). Adding function-based behavioral support to first step to success: Integrating individualized and manualized practices. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11(1), 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chafouleas, S. M., Briesch, A. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & McCoach, D. B. (2009). Moving beyond assessment of treatment acceptability: An examination of the factor structure of the usage rating profile—intervention (URP-I). School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chitiyo, M., & Wheeler, J. J. (2009). Challenges faced by school teachers in implementing positive behavior support in their school systems. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. *Devlin, S., Healy, O., Leader, G., & Hughes, B. M. (2011). Comparison of behavioral intervention and sensory-integration therapy in the treatment of challenging behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(10), 1303–1320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. *Devlin, S., Leader, G., & Healy, O. (2009). Comparison of behavioral intervention and sensory-integration therapy in the treatment of self-injurious behavior. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. *Doughty, S. S., Poe, S. G., & Anderson, C. M. (2005). Effects of punishment and response-independent attention on severe problem behavior and appropriate toy play. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 2(2), 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunlap, G., & Fox, L. (2011). Function-based interventions for children with challenging behavior. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(4), 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunn, M. E., Shelnut, J., Ryan, J. B., & Katsiyannis, A. (2017). A systematic review of peer-mediated interventions on the academic achievement of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 40(4), 497–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. *Ellingson, S., Miltenberger, R., Stricker, J., Galensky, T., & Garlinghouse, M. (2000). Functional assessment and intervention for challenging behaviors in the classroom by General classroom teachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2(2), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliott, S. N., & Treuting, M. V. (1991). The Behavior Intervention Rating Scale: Development and validation of a pretreatment acceptability and effectiveness measure. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. *Everett, G. E., Olmi, D. J., Edwards, R. P., Tingstrom, D. H., Sterling-Turner, H. E., & Christ, T. J. (2007). An empirical investigation of time-out with and without escape extinction to treat escape-maintained noncompliance. Behavior Modification, 31(4), 412–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fettig, A., & Barton, E. E. (2014). Parent implementation of function-based intervention to reduce children’s challenging behavior: A literature review. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34(1), 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. *Filter, K. J., & Horner, R. H. (2009). Function-based academic interventions for problem behavior. Education and Treatment of Children, 32(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  25. Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gresham, F. M., Watson, T. S., & Skinner, C. H. (2001). Functional behavioral assessment: Principles, procedures, and future direction. School Psychology Review, 30(2), 156–172.Google Scholar
  27. Hanley, G. P. (2012). Functional assessment of problem behavior: Dispelling myths, overcoming implementation obstacles, and developing new lore. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5(1), 54–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. *Hansen, B. D., Wills, H. P., & Kamps, D. M. (2014a). Effects of aligning self-management interventions with functional behavioral assessment. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(3), 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. *Hansen, B. D., Wills, H. P., Kamps, D. M., & Greenwood, C. R. (2014b). The effects of function-based self-management interventions on student behavior. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(3), 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Horner, R. H. (1994). Functional assessment: Contributions and future directions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(2), 401–404.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hurl, K., Wightman, J., Haynes, S. N., & Virues-Ortega, J. (2016). Does a pre-intervention functional assessment increase intervention effectiveness? A meta-analysis of within-subject interrupted time-series studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 47, 71–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).Google Scholar
  33. *Ingram, K., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Sugai, G. (2005). Function-based intervention planning comparing the effectiveness of FBA function-based and non-function-based intervention plans. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7(4), 224–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(2), 197–209.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1993). Strategies and tactics for human behavioral research (2nd ed.). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. *Kilgus, S. P., Fallon, L. M., & Feinberg, A. B. (2016). Function-based modification of check-in/check-out to influence escape-maintained behavior. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 32(1), 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kowalewicz, E. A., & Coffee, G. (2014). Mystery motivator: A tier 1 classroom behavioral intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(2), 138–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation (version 1.0). What Works Clearinghouse website: Retrieved 16 November 2017, from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/ReferenceResources/wwc_scd.pdf.
  39. Lane, K. L., Kalberg, J. R., & Shepcaro, J. C. (2009). An examination of the evidence base for function-based interventions for students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders attending middle and high schools. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 321–340.Google Scholar
  40. Luckasson, R. A. (2006). The human rights basis for student personal empowerment in education. In E. B. Keefe, V. M. Moore, & F. R. Duff (Eds.), Listening to the experts: Students with disabilities speak out (pp. 11–20). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  41. Martens, B. K., Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Darveaux, D. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. *Mason, S. A., & Iwata, B. A. (1990). Artifactual effects of sensory-integrative therapy on self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23(3), 361–370.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McKenna, J. W., Flower, A., & Adamson, R. (2016). A systematic review of function-based replacement behavior interventions for students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavior Modification, 40(5), 678–712.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445515621489.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. McKenna, J. W., Flower, A., Kim, M. K., Ciullo, S., & Haring, C. (2015). A systematic review of function-based interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. *Meyer, K. A. (1999). Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior exhibited by elementary school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(2), 229–232.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. *Newcomer, L. L., & Lewis, T. J. (2004). Functional behavioral assessment an investigation of assessment reliability and effectiveness of function-based interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12(3), 168–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Neil, R. E., Albin, R. W., Storey, K., Horner, R. H., & Sprague, J. R. (2015). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior. CT: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  48. *Pane, H. M., Sidener, T. M., Vladescu, J. C., & Nirgudkar, A. (2015). Evaluating function-based social stories™ with children with autism. Behavior Modification, 39(6), 912–931.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445515603708.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. *Payne, L. D., Scott, T. M., & Conroy, M. (2007). A school-based examination of the efficacy of function-based intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 32(3), 158–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pelios, L., Morren, J., Tesch, D., & Axelrod, S. (1999). The impact of functional analysis methodology on treatment choice for self-injurious and aggressive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(2), 185–195.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poling, A., Austin, J. L., Peterson, S. M., Mahoney, A., & Weeden, M. (2012). Ethical issues and considerations. In J. L. Matson (Ed.) Functional assessment for challenging behaviors (pp. 213–233). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Rakap, S., Rakap, S., Evran, D., & Cig, O. (2016). Comparative evaluation of the reliability and validity of three data extraction programs: UnGraph, GraphClick, and DigitizeIt. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reimers, T. M., Wacker, D. P., Cooper, L. J., & DeRaad, A. O. (1992). Acceptability of behavioral treatment for children: Analog and naturalistic evaluations by parents. School Psychology Review, 21, 628–643.Google Scholar
  54. Rhode, G., Jenson, W. R., & Reavis, H. K. (1992). The tough kid book: Practical classroom management strategies. Longmant, CO: Soprios West.Google Scholar
  55. *Rispoli, M., Ninci, J., Burke, M. D., Zaini, S., Hatton, H., & Sanchez, L. (2015). Evaluating the accuracy of results for teacher implemented trial-based functional analyses. Behavior Modification, 39(5), 627–653.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445515590456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Robichaux, N. M., & Gresham, F. M. (2014). Differential effects of the Mystery Motivator intervention using student-selected and mystery rewards. School Psychology Review, 43(3), 286–298.Google Scholar
  57. Schill, M. T., Kratochwill, T. R., & Elliott, S. N. (1998). Functional assessment in behavioral consultation: A treatment utility study. School Psychology Quarterly, 13(2), 116–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schlinger, H. D., & Normand, M. P. (2013). On the origin and functions of the term functional analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(1), 285–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  60. Slaton, J. D., & Hanley, G. P. (2018). Nature and scope of synthesis in functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51(4), 943–973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith, R. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1997). Antecedent influences on behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(2), 343–375.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stage, S. A., Jackson, H. G., Jensen, M. J., Moscovitz, K. K., Bush, J. W., Violette, H. D., et al. (2008). A validity study of functionally-based behavioral consultation with students with emotional/behavioral disabilities. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(3), 327–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. *Trussell, R. P., Lewis, T. J., & Raynor, C. (2016). The impact of universal teacher practices and function-based behavioral interventions on the rates of problem behaviors among at-risk students. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(3), 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. *Trussell, R. P., Lewis, T. J., & Stichter, J. P. (2008). The impact of targeted classroom interventions and function-based behavior interventions on problem behaviors of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 33(3), 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walker, V. L., Chung, Y. C., & Bonnet, L. K. (2018). Function-based intervention in inclusive school settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(4), 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weston, M., Taylor, K. L., Batterham, A. M., & Hopkins, W. G. (2014). Effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training (HIT) on fitness in adults: a meta-analysis of controlled and non-controlled trials. Sports Medicine, 44(7), 1005–1017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. What Works Clearinghouse. (2017). What works clearinghouse: Standards handbook version 4.0. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Retrieved 24 December 2018, from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_standards_handbook_v4.pdf.
  68. Wood, B. K., Oakes, W. P., Fettig, A., & Lane, K. L. (2015). A review of the evidence base of functional assessment-based interventions for young students using one systematic approach. Behavioral Disorders, 40(4), 230–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Special EducationUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations