Effects of Systematically Removing Components of the Good Behavior Game in Preschool Classrooms
- 84 Downloads
Disruptive classroom behavior produces a host of problems for students and teachers. The Good Behavior Game (GBG) is an effective procedure to reduce disruptive behavior. In this study, experimenters conducted the GBG in two preschool classes and demonstrated its effectiveness using a reversal design. Subsequently, experimenters systematically removed components of the GBG in a multiple baseline across classes design. Several features of the GBG were successfully removed without a return of disruptive behavior. Vocal feedback could not be removed in either class without disruptive behavior increasing. These data demonstrate one potential way to reduce teacher effort while maintaining the effects of the GBG.
KeywordsClassroom management Component analysis Disruptive behavior Group contingency Good Behavior Game
We thank Taylor Rushing, Aubrey Ticer, Katherine Lantier, and Sarah Holmes for their assistance with data collection and conducting sessions.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Louisiana State University Institutional Review Board (IRB#3776) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. M. (1969). Good Behavior Game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1969.2-119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Louisiana Department of Education. (2019). Feb 2018 Multi stats (Total by Site and School System). Retrieved August 16, 2019 from https://www.louisianabelieves.com/resources/library/student-attributes.
- Newcomer, A. R., Roth, K. B., Kellam, S. G., Wang, W., Ialongo, N. S., Hart, S. R., et al. (2016). Higher childhood peer reports of social preference mediates the impact of the Good Behavior Game on suicide attempt. Prevention Science, 17, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0593-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Pianta, R., Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Bryant, D., Clifford, R., Early, D., et al. (2005). Features of pre-kindergarten programs, classrooms, and teachers: Do they predict observed classroom quality and child-teacher interactions? Applied Developmental Science, 9, 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0903_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ramirez, L. H., Hawkins, R. O., Collins, T. A., Ritter, C., & Haydon, T. (2019). Generalizing the effects of group contingencies across instructional settings for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. School Psychology Review, 48, 98–112. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0122.V48-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Silver, R. B., Measelle, J. R., Armstrong, J. M., & Essex, M. J. (2010). The impact of parents, child care providers, teachers and peers on early externalizing trajectories. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 555–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.08.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Sy, J. R., Gratz, O., & Donaldson, J. M. (2016). The Good Behavior Game with students in alternative educational environments: Interactions between reinforcement criteria and scoring accuracy. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-016-9257-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tanol, G., Johnson, L., McComas, J., & Cote, E. (2010). Responding to rule violations or rule following: A comparison of two versions of the Good Behavior Game with kindergarten students. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.06.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar