Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Headsprout: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

  • 109 Accesses

Abstract

Reading is a crucial skill for students to develop, not only as they enter school but also as they continue throughout K-12 education. Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) is one means of providing supplemental support for students to build the foundational key areas of reading—so they can use reading to learn in later schooling years. One such CAI program that exists in the marketplace is Headsprout, which includes both an Early Reading and Reading Comprehension component. To date, no peer-reviewed studies have conducted a systematic review of the effectiveness of Headsprout on the five key areas of reading in the school setting. The most recent governmental review was completed almost a decade ago. As such, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the existing literature base to determine the level of evidence for each component’s effectiveness on each of the key areas of reading and identify existing avenues of future research. Results indicated tentative support for both components in some of the key areas of reading based on effect sizes, though there were a limited number of studies and the methodological rigor of included studies did not always meet What Works Clearinghouse standards. Implications for educators and researchers are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

References preceded by an asterisk were included in the systematic review

  1. Becker, L. A. (1999). Effect size calculators (Web-based application). Colorado Springs, CO: University of Colorado. Retrieved from www.uccs.edu/lbecker/.

  2. Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M., & Overmaat, M. (2002). Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: A review. Review of Educational Research,72, 101–130.

  3. *Clarfield, J., & Stoner, G. (2005). The effects of computerized reading instruction on the academic performance of students identified with ADHD. School Psychology Review,34, 246–254.

  4. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press Inc.

  5. *Cullen, J. M., Alber-Morgan, S. R., Schnell, S. T., & Wheaton, J. E. (2014). Improving reading skills of students with disabilities using Headsprout comprehension. Remedial and Special Education,35, 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514534075.

  6. Drevon, D. D., Fursa, S. R., & Malcolm, A. L. (2017). Intercoder reliability and validity of WebPlotDigitizer in extracting graphed data. Behavior Modification,41, 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516673998.

  7. Headsprout. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.headsprout.com/.

  8. *Huffstetter, M., King, J. R., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Schneider, J. J., & Powell-Smith, K. A. (2010). Effects of a computer-based early reading program on the early reading and oral language skills of at-risk preschool children. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk,15, 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2010.532415.

  9. *Kreskey, D. D., & Truscott, S. D. (2016). Is computer-aided instruction an effective tier-one intervention for kindergarten students at risk for reading failure in an applied setting? Contemporary School Psychology,20, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0056-8.

  10. Layng, T. V., Sota, M., & Leon, M. (2011). Thinking through text comprehension I: Foundation and guiding relations. The Behavior Analyst Today,12, 3–11.

  11. Layng, T. J., Twyman, J. S., & Stikeleather, G. (2003). Headsprout early reading: Reliably teaching children to read. Behavioral Technology Today,3, 7–20.

  12. Layng, T. J., Twyman, J. S., & Stikeleather, G. (2004). Selected for success: How Headsprout reading basics teaches beginning reading. Evidence-Based Educational Methods,171, 197.

  13. Leon, M., Ford, V., Shimizu, H., Stretz, A. H., Thompson, J., Sota, M., et al. (2011a). Comprehension by design: Teaching young learners how to comprehend what they read. Performance Improvement,50, 40–47.

  14. Leon, M., Layng, T. V., & Sota, M. (2011b). Thinking through text comprehension III: The programing of verbal and investigative repertoires. The Behavior Analyst Today,12, 22.

  15. Marsh, M. (1983). Computer assisted instruction in reading. Journal of Reading,26, 697–701.

  16. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health.

  17. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PloS Med,6, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

  18. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,2, 31–74.

  19. Rohatgi, A. (2018). WebPlotDigitizer (Version 4.1) (Computer software). Retrieved from http://arohatgi.info/WebPlotDigitizer.

  20. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts Inc.

  21. Sota, M., & Layng, T. V. (2011). Thinking through text comprehension II: Analysis of verbal and investigative repertoires. The Behavior Analyst Today,12, 12–20.

  22. Sparks, R. L., Patton, J., & Murdoch, A. (2014). Early reading success and its relationship to reading achievement and reading volume: Replication of ‘10 years later’. Reading and Writing,27, 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9439-2.

  23. Twyman, J. S., Layng, T. J., Stikeleather, G., & Hobbins, K. A. (2004). A non-linear approach to curriculum design: The role of behavior analysis in building an effective reading program. Focus on Behavior Analysis in Education,3, 55–68.

  24. *Tyler, E. J., Hughes, J. C., Beverly, M., & Hastings, R. P. (2015). Improving early reading skills for beginning readers using an online programme as supplementary instruction. European Journal of Psychology of Education,3, 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0240-7.

  25. Vannest, K. J., & Ninci, J. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development,93, 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12038.

  26. Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., Gonen, O., & Adiguzel, T. (2016). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0) (Web-based application). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. Retrieved from http://www.singlecaseresearch.org.

  27. What Works Clearinghouse. (2009). WWC intervention report: Headsprout early reading. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Education.

  28. What Works Clearinghouse. (2017). Standards handbook (v. 4.0). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.

  29. *Whitcomb, S. A., Bass, J. D., & Luiselli, J. K. (2011). Effects of a computer-based early reading program (Headsprout) on word list and text reading skills in a student with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities,23, 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-011-9240-6.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Alexander M. Rigney.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rigney, A.M., Hixson, M.D. & Drevon, D.D. Headsprout: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. J Behav Educ 29, 153–167 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-019-09345-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Headsprout
  • Early reading
  • Comprehension
  • Systematic review
  • Computer-assisted instruction