Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 42–63 | Cite as

Functional Communication Training for Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Quality Appraisal

  • Emily GregoriEmail author
  • Oliver Wendt
  • Stephanie Gerow
  • Corey Peltier
  • Derya Genc-Tosun
  • Catharine Lory
  • Zachary S. Gold
Original Paper

Abstract

Functional communication training (FCT) is one of the most common treatments for challenging behavior and is considered an empirically supported practice for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, no previous systematic review has evaluated the quality of FCT for adults with ASD, and the empirical support for this practice among adults is unknown. The purpose of the current review was to synthesize the extant research, including a quality appraisal of the literature on the use of FCT to treat challenging behavior for adults with ASD. We identified 20 studies that evaluated the efficacy of FCT in reducing challenging behavior for adults with ASD. The quality of each article was evaluated based on the What Works Clearinghouse design and evidence standards. Following the quality and evidence evaluations, eight studies, including eight experiments, were found to have moderate or strong evidence of effectiveness. The current body of literature provides some evidence for the efficacy of FCT in reducing challenging behavior for adults with ASD, but additional research in this area is warranted.

Keywords

Autism Adults Challenging behavior Functional communication training Differential reinforcement 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the review.Google Scholar
  2. *Adami, S., Falcomata, T. S., Muething, C. S., & Hoffman, K. (2017). An evaluation of lag schedules of reinforcement during functional communication training: Effects on varied mand responding and challenging behavior. Behavior Analysis in Practice.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0179-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Andzik, N. R., Cannella-Malone, H. I., & Sigafoos, J. (2016). Practitioner-implemented functional communication training: A review of the literature. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(2), 79–89. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1099223&site=ehost-live
  4. *Bird, F., Dores, P. A., Moniz, D., & Robinson, J. (1989). Reducing severe aggressive and self-injurious behaviors with functional communication training. American Journal on Mental Retardation,94(1), 37–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. *Byiers, B. J., Dimian, A., & Symons, F. J. (2014). Functional communication training in Rett syndrome: A preliminary study. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,119(4), 340–350.  https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-119.4.34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. *Campos, C., Leon, Y., Sleiman, A., & Urcuyo, B. (2017). Further evaluation of the use of multiple schedules for behavior maintained by negative reinforcement. Behavior Modification,41(2), 269–285.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516670838.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,18(2), 111–126.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. *Chezan, L. C., Drasgow, E., & Martin, C. A. (2014). Discrete-trial functional analysis and functional communication training with three adults with intellectual disabilities and problem behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education,23(2), 221–246.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-013-9192-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chezan, L. C., Wolfe, K., & Drasgow, E. (2018). A meta-analysis of functional communication training effects on problem behavior and alternative communicative responses. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities,33(4), 195–205.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357617741294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
  11. Emerson, E., Robertson, J., Gregory, N., Hatton, C., Kessissoglou, S., Hallam, A., et al. (2000). Treatment and management of challenging behaviours in residential settings. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,13(4), 197–215.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3148.2000.00036.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. *Fahmie, T. A., Iwata, B. A., & Mead, S. C. (2016). Within-subject analysis of a prevention strategy for problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,49(4), 915–926.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.343.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Falcomata, T. S., & Wacker, D. P. (2013). On the use of strategies for programming generalization during functional communication training: A review of the literature. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities,25(1), 5–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9311-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fisher, W. W., Greer, B. D., Romani, P. W., Zangrillo, A. N., & Owen, T. M. (2016). Comparisons of synthesized and individual reinforcement contingencies during functional analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,49(3), 596–616.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.314.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. *Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., Hagopian, L. P., Bowman, L. G., & Krug, A. (2000). Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training. Behavior Modification,24(1), 3–29.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500241001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerber, F., Bessero, S., Robbiani, B., Courvoisier, D. S., Baud, M. A., Traore, M., et al. (2011). Comparing residential programmes for adults with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability: Outcomes of challenging behaviour and quality of life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,55(9), 918–932.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01455.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerhardt, P. F., & Lainer, I. (2011). Addressing the needs of adolescents and adults with autism: A crisis on the horizon. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy,41(1), 37–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-010-9460-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerow, S., Davis, T., Radhakrishnan, S., Gregori, E., & Rivera, G. (2018a). Functional communication training: The strength of evidence across disabilities. Exceptional Children.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918793399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerow, S., Hagan-Burke, S., Rispoli, M., Gregori, E., Mason, R., & Ninci, J. (2018b). A systematic review of parent-implemented functional communication training for children with ASD. Behavior Modification,42(3), 335–363.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445517740872.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. *Ghaemmaghami, M., Hanley, G. P., & Jessel, J. (2016). Contingencies promote delay tolerance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,49(3), 548–575.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanley, G. P., Jin, C. S., Vanselow, N. R., & Hanratty, L. A. (2014). Producing meaningful improvements in problem behavior of children with autism via synthesized analyses and treatments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,47(1), 16–36.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Heath, A. K., Ganz, J. B., Parker, R., Burke, M., & Ninci, J. (2015). A meta-analytic review of functional communication training across mode of communication, age, and disability. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,2(2), 155–166.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-014-0044-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holden, B., & Gitlesen, J. P. (2006). A total population study of challenging behaviour in the county of Hedmark, Norway: Prevalence, and risk markers. Research in Developmental Disabilities,27(4), 456–465.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2005.06.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hong, E. R., Ganz, J. B., Neely, L., Gerow, S., & Ninci, J. (2016). A review of the quality of primary caregiver-implemented communication intervention research for children with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders,25, 122–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2016.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. *Horner, R. H., & Day, H. M. (1991). The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent competing behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,24(4), 719–732.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-719.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Howlin, P., & Moss, P. (2012). Adults with autism spectrum disorders. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/La Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie,57(5), 275–283.  https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371205700502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,27(2), 197–209.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. *Jensen, C. C., Mcconnachie, G., & Pierson, T. (2001). Long-term multicomponent intervention to reduce severe problem behavior: A 63-month evaluation. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,3(4), 225–236.  https://doi.org/10.1177/109830070100300404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. *Kunnavatana, S. S., Bloom, S. E., Samaha, A. L., Slocum, T. A., & Clay, C. J. (2018a). Manipulating parameters of reinforcement to reduce problem behavior without extinction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,51(2), 283–302.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.443.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. *Kunnavatana, S. S., Wolfe, K., & Aguilar, A. N. (2018b). Assessing mand topography preference when developing a functional communication training intervention. Behavior Modification,42(3), 364–381.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445517751437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. *Langdon, N. A., Carr, E. G., & Owen-DeSchryver, J. S. (2008). Functional analysis of precursors for serious problem behavior and related intervention. Behavior Modification,32(6), 804–827.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445508317943.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. *Lehardy, R. K., Lerman, D. C., Evans, L. M., O’Connor, A., & LeSage, D. L. (2013). A simplified methodology for identifying the function of elopement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,46(1), 256–270.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. *Lindauer, S. E., Zarcone, J. R., Richman, D. M., & Schroeder, S. R. (2002). A comparison of multiple reinforcer assessments to identify the function of maladaptive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,35(3), 299–303.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2002.35-299.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Maggin, D. M., Briesch, A. M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2013). An application of the What works clearinghouse standards for evaluating single-subject research: Synthesis of the self-management literature base. Remedial and Special Education,34(1), 44–58.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511435176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manente, C. J., Maraventano, J. C., LaRue, R. H., Delmolino, L., & Sloan, D. (2010). Effective behavioral intervention for adults on the autism spectrum: Best practices in functional assessment and treatment development. Behavior Analyst Today,11(1), 36–48.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matson, J. L., & Rivet, T. T. (2008). Characteristics of challenging behaviours in adults with autistic disorder, PDD-NOS, and intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability,33(4), 323–329.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250802492600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. McClintock, K., Hall, S., & Oliver, C. (2003). Risk markers associated with challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,47(6), 405–416.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00517.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mills, S., & Rose, J. (2011). The relationship between challenging behaviour, burnout and cognitive variables in staff working with people who have intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,55(9), 844–857.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01438.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Neely, L., Garcia, E., Bankston, B., & Green, A. (2018). Generalization and maintenance of functional communication training for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic and quality review. Research in Developmental Disabilities.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. *Petursson, P. I., & Eldevik, S. (2018). Functional analysis and communication training to reduce problem behavior and time in restraint: A case study. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice.  https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. *Rehfeldt, R. A., & Chambers, M. R. (2003). Functional analysis and treatment of verbal perseverations displayed by an adult with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,36(2), 259–261.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-259.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. *Sigafoos, J., & Tucker, M. (2000). Brief assessment and treatment of multiple challenging behaviors. Behavioral Interventions,15(1), 53–70.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-078X(200001/03)15:1%3c53:AID-BIN43%3e3.0.CO;2-V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. *Slaton, J. D., Hanley, G. P., & Raftery, K. J. (2017). Interview-informed functional analyses: A comparison of synthesized and isolated components. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,50(2), 252–277.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.384.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sullivan, R. C. (2007). Position paper on the national crisis in adult services for individuals with autism: A call to action (pp. 1–16). Bethesda: Autism Society of America.Google Scholar
  46. Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Bruzek, J. (2008). Functional communication training: A review and practical guide. Behavior Analysis in Practice,1(1), 16–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391716.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. *Tincani, M. J., Castrogiavanni, A., & Axelrod, S. (1999). A comparison of the effectiveness of brief versus traditional functional analyses. Research in Developmental Disabilities,20(5), 327–338.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(99)00014-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Turcotte, P., Mathew, M., Shea, L. L., Brusilovskiy, E., & Nonnemacher, S. L. (2016). Service needs across the lifespan for individuals with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,46(7), 2480–2489.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2787-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K. A., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., et al. (2014). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,45(7), 1951–1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang, L. J. (2003). Combination of extinction and protective measures in the treatment of severely self-injurious behavior. Behavioral Interventions,18(2), 109–121.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily Gregori
    • 1
    Email author
  • Oliver Wendt
    • 2
  • Stephanie Gerow
    • 3
  • Corey Peltier
    • 4
  • Derya Genc-Tosun
    • 5
  • Catharine Lory
    • 1
  • Zachary S. Gold
    • 6
  1. 1.College of EducationPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.College of Health and Human SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  3. 3.College of EducationBaylor UniversityWacoUSA
  4. 4.College of EducationUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  5. 5.Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityOdunpazarıTurkey
  6. 6.Condcordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations