Training Front-Line Employees to Conduct Visual Analysis Using a Clinical Decision-Making Model
Behavior analysts visually analyze graphs to interpret data in order to make data-based decisions. Though front-line employees implement behavioral interventions on a daily basis, they are not often trained to interpret these data. A clinical decision-making model may aid front-line employees in learning how to interpret graphs. A multiple-baseline-across-participants design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical decision-making model on the percentage of correct responses when interpreting line graphs. All of the participants increased their percentage of correct responses after the introduction of the clinical decision-making model. Two of the eight participants required additional feedback. The implications of these findings are discussed.
KeywordsClinical decision-making model Employee training Visual analysis
The authors thank the Early Learning Institute for its support in conducting this study.
This project was completed in partial fulfillment of a Masters in Applied Behavior Analysis Degree by the first author, under the supervision of the second author.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2016a). Professional and ethical compliance code for behavior analysts. Retrieved July 20, 2019, from http://bacb.com/ethics-code/.
- Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2016b). Registered Behavior Technician™ (RBT ® ) task list. Retrieved April 17, 2017, from http://bacb.com/rbt-task-list/.
- Board, Behavior Analyst Certification. (2018). US employment demand for behavior analysts: 2010–2017. Littleton, CO: Author.Google Scholar
- Brodhead, M. T., Cox, D. J., & Quigley, S. P. (2018). Practical ethics for effective treatment of autism spectrum disorder. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Grow, L. L., Carr, J. E., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2009). Treatments for attention-maintain problem behavior: Empirical support and clinical recommendations. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 10, 70–92.Google Scholar
- Higbee, T. S., Aporta, A. P., Resenda, M. N., Goyos, C., & Pollard, J. S. (2016). Interactive computer training to teach discrete-trial instruction to undergraduates and special educators in Brazil: A replication and extension. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 780–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kelly, A., & Tincani, M. (2013). Collaborative training and practice among applied behavior analysts who support individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 120–131.Google Scholar
- LeBlanc, L. A., Gravina, N., & Carr, J. E. (2009). Training issues unique to autism spectrum disorder. In J. L. Maston (Ed.), Applied behavior analysis for children with autism spectrum disorders (pp. 225–235). Auburn, AL: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0088-3_13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pollard, J. S., Higbee, T. S., Akers, J. S., & Brodhead, M. T. (2014). An evaluation of interactive computer training to teach instructors to implement discrete trials with children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 765–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific-research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Stewart, K. K., Carr, J. E., Brandt, C. W., & McHenry, M. M. (2007). An evaluation of the conservation dual-criterion method for teaching university students to visually inspect AB-design graphs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 713–718. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.713-718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar