Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 191–206 | Cite as

Establishing and Evaluating the Substantive Adequacy of Positive Behavioral Support Plans

  • Clayton R. CookEmail author
  • S. Dean Crews
  • Diana Browning Wright
  • G. Roy Mayer
  • Bruce Gale
  • Bonnie Kraemer
  • Frank M. Gresham
Original Paper

Abstract

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (2004) renewed the commitment to provide positive behavioral support (PBS) for students that engage in persistent problem behavior. Behavior intervention plans (also known as PBS plans) serve as legal documents that help guide the implementation of intervention strategies to encourage more positive forms of behavior. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the substantive adequacy of PBS plans developed for special education students. This was accomplished by documenting the content of plans developed by two different groups of educators using a rating instrument based on the key concepts of PBS planning. Results revealed that the majority of plans developed by teams without identified training and expertise in PBS were rated as substantively inadequate, lacking critical information related to effective behavioral support planning. The implications of the results for everyday practice in the schools and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

Behavior support plans Positive behavioral support Functional assessment IDEA 

References

  1. Alex R. v. Forrestville Valley Community Unit School District. No. 03-3858[7th Cir. July, 2004]. Retrieved on April 9, 2005 from http://caselaw.lp.find.com/data2/circs/7th/033588p.pdf.Google Scholar
  2. Algozzine, B., Audette, B., Ellis, E., Marr, M. B., & White, R. (2000). Supporting teachers, principals, and students through unified discipline. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(2), 42–47.Google Scholar
  3. Browning-Wright, D., Saren, D., & Mayer, G. R. (2003). The behavior support plan-quality evaluation guide. Retrieved on April 2005 from www.pent.ca.gov.Google Scholar
  4. Buck, G. H., Polloway, E. A., Kirkpatrick, M. A., Patton, J. R., & McConnel-Fad, K. (2000). Developing behavioral intervention plans: A sequential approach. Intervention in School and Clinic, 36, 3–9.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd edn.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Conroy, M., Katsiyannis, A., Clark, D., Gable, R. A., & Fox, J. M. (2002). State Office of Education Practices: Implementing the IDEA disciplinary provisions. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 98–108.Google Scholar
  7. Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice (2000). An IEP team’s introduction to functional behavioral assessment and behavioral intervention plans. Retrieved on April 2005 from http://www. air.org/cecp/fba/default.htm.Google Scholar
  8. Crone, D. A., & Horner, R. H. (2003). Building positive behavior support systems in schools. New York, London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Drasgow, E., Yell, M. L., Bradley, R., & Shriner, J. G. (1999). The IDEA amendments of 1997: A school-wide model for conducting functional behavioral assessments and developing behavior intervention plans. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 244–266.Google Scholar
  10. Drasgow, E., & Yell, M. L. (2001). School-wide behavior support: Legal implications and requirements. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 24, 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. Google Scholar
  12. Ellingson, S. A., Miltenberger, R. G., Stricker, J., Galensky, T., & Garlinghouse, M. (2000). Functional assessment and intervention for challenging behaviors in the classroom by general classroom teachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2(2), 85–97.Google Scholar
  13. Flugum, K. R., & Reschly, D. J. (1994). Prereferral interventions: Quality indices and outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gable, R. A., Quinn, M. M., Rutherford, R. B., & Howell, K. (1998). Addressing problem behavior in schools: Use of functional assessment and behavior intervention plans. Preventing School Failure, 42, 106–118.Google Scholar
  15. Gresham, F. M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review, 18(1), 37–50.Google Scholar
  16. Gresham, F. M. (2003). Establishing the technical adequacy of functional behavioral assessment: Conceptual and measurement challenges. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 282–298.Google Scholar
  17. Gresham, F. M., & Noell, G. H. (1999). Functional analysis assessment as a cornerstone of noncategorical special education. In D. J. Reschly, W. D. Tilly III, & J. P. Grimes (Eds.), Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming (pp. 39–64). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.Google Scholar
  18. Gresham, F. M., Watson, T. S., & Skinner, C. H. (2001). Functional behavioral assessment: Principles, procedures, and future directions. School Psychology Review, 30, 156–172.Google Scholar
  19. Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Todd, A. W., & Lewis-Palmer, T. (1999–2000). Elements of behavior support plans: A technical brief. Exceptionality, 8, 205–215.Google Scholar
  20. Horner, R., & Carr, E. (1997). Behavioral support for students with severe disabilities: Functional assessment and comprehensive intervention. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 84–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. Google Scholar
  22. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act Amendments of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1462(h) et seq. Google Scholar
  23. Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1993). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research (2nd edn.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  24. Kern, L., Childs, K. E., Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., & Falk, G. D. (1994). Using assessment-based curricular intervention to improve the classroom behavior of a student with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 7–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Langdon, C. A., & Vesper, N. (2000). The sixth Phi Delta Kappa poll of teacher’s attitudes toward the public schools. Kappan, 81, 607–611.Google Scholar
  26. Levene, H. (1960). Tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkin, S. G. Ghurye, & W. Hoeffding (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling (pp. 278–292). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Maloney, M. (1994). How to avoid the discipline trap. The Special Educator, Winter, 1–4.Google Scholar
  28. Mayer, G. R., & Ybarra, W. (2003). Teaching alternative behavior schoolwide (TABS). A resource guide to prevent discipline problems. Downey, CA: The Los Angeles County Office of Education, Safe Schools.Google Scholar
  29. Nelson, R. J., Crabtree, M., Marchand-Martella, N., & Martella, R. (1998). Teaching good behavior in the whole school. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30, 4–9.Google Scholar
  30. O’Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. H., Storey, K., & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook (2nd edn.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  31. People v. Mason City Community Sch. Dist., (Iowa) 32 IDELR 216 (2000).Google Scholar
  32. Quinn, M. M., Gable, R. A., Fox, J., Rutherford, R. B., Van Acker, R., & Conroy, M. (2001). Putting quality functional assessment into practice in schools: A research agenda on behalfof E/BD students. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 261–275.Google Scholar
  33. Rose, L. C., & Gallup, A. M. (1999). The 31st annual Phi Delta Kappa/ Gallup poll of the public’s attitude toward the public schools. Kappan, 81, 41–58.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rutherford, R. B., Quinn, M. M., & Mathur, S. R. (2004). Handbook of research in emocional and behavioral disorders. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Salas, E., & Fiore, S. M. (2004). Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  37. Sasso, G., Conroy, M., Stichter, J., & Fox, J. (2001). Slowing down the bandwagon: The misapplication of functional behavior assessment for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 282–296.Google Scholar
  38. Satcher, D. (2001). Youth violence: A report of the Surgeon General. Retrieved on March 2005 from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/youthviolence/.Google Scholar
  39. Scott, T. M. (2003). Making behavior intervention planning decisions in a schoolwide system of positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptional Children, 36, 1–18.Google Scholar
  40. Scott, T. M., & Nelson, C. M. (1999). Functional behavioral assessment: Implications for training and staff development. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 249–252.Google Scholar
  41. Scott, T. M., Liaupsin, C., & Nelson, C. M. (2001). Behavior intervention planning: Using the outcomes of functional behavioral assessment. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.Google Scholar
  42. Shapiro, E. S., & Lentz, F. E. (1985). A survey of school psychologists’ use of behavior modification procedures. Journal of School Psychology, 23, 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skiba, R. J. (2002). Special education and school discipline: A precarious balance. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 81–97.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, C. R. (2000). Behavioral and discipline provisions of IDEA ’97: Implicit competencies yet to be confirmed. Exceptional Children, 66, 403–412.Google Scholar
  45. Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 9, 1–14.Google Scholar
  46. Sugai, G., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Hagan-Burke, S. (1999–2000). Overview of functional behavioral assessment process. Exceptionality, 8, 149–160.Google Scholar
  47. Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 24, 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, G. R. (1991). Behavior analysis for lasting change. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  49. Sutherland, K. S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). The effect of the self-evaluation on teaching behavior in classrooms for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Special Education, 32, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2001). Youth violence: A report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  51. Van Acker, R., Boreson, L., Gable, R. A., & Potterton, T. (2005). Are we on the right course? Lessons learned about current FBA/BIP practices in schools. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walker, H. M., Ramsey, E., & Gresham, F. M. (2003). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  53. Wehby, J. H., Lane, K. L., & Falk, K. B. (2003). Academic instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11(4), 194–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Witt, J., Daly, E., & Noell, G. (2000). Functional assessments: A step-by-step guide to solving academic and behavior problems. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.Google Scholar
  55. Yell, M. L. (2002). The law and special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  56. Yell, M. L., & Shriner, J. G. (1998). The discipline of students with disabilities: Requirements of the IDEA amendments of 1997. Education and Treatment of Children, 21, 246–257.Google Scholar
  57. Yell, M. L., & Katisiyannis, A. (2000). Functional behavioral assessment and IDEA ’97: Legal and practice considerations. Preventing School Failure, 44, 158–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zukowski, J. K., Kelly, P. S., & Griswold, D. E. (1998). Discipline and IDEA 1997: Instituting a new balance. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zabel, R. H., & Zabel, M. K. (2002). Burnout among special education teachers and perceptions of support. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 15, 67–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clayton R. Cook
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Dean Crews
    • 1
  • Diana Browning Wright
    • 2
  • G. Roy Mayer
    • 3
  • Bruce Gale
    • 4
  • Bonnie Kraemer
    • 5
  • Frank M. Gresham
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Counseling, Educational, and Developmental PsychologyEastern Washington UniversityCheneyUSA
  2. 2.California Department of Education-Diagnostic CenterFremontUSA
  3. 3.Charter College of EducationCalifornia State UniversityLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.BehaviorTech SolutionsEncinoUSA
  5. 5.Department of Special EducationSan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  6. 6.Department of PsychologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations