Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 105–115 | Cite as

Mnemonics Strategy Development: Improving Alphabetic Understanding In Turkish Students, At Risk for Failure in EFL Settings

Article
  • 137 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of integrated mnemonics on consonant letter naming and consonant sound production for three 4th grade Turkish students, at-risk for failure in an English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) classroom. Mnemonic picture cards, where the target consonant letter was embedded as an integral part of the picture, were developed (e.g., the letter C as the clock, the letter D as the drum). Results showed that (a) all three students reached mastery on consonant letter naming, and (b) all three students showed marked improvement for consonant sound production, with one student reaching mastery. Letter-sound correspondence performance remained near instructional levels one week post-intervention. Generalization data showed students could produce some words that began and ended with consonant sounds, once consonant letter-sound correspondence was mastered.

Keywords

mnemonics EFL alphabetic understanding urban education international education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agramonte, V., & Belfiore, P. J. (2002). Using mnemonics to increase early literacy Skills in urban kindergarten students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 181–190.Google Scholar
  3. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental design: Strategies for studying behavior change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  4. Baer, D. R., & Templeton, S. (1998). Exploration in developmental spelling: Foundations for learning and teaching phonics, spelling, and vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 53, 222–242.Google Scholar
  5. Fulk, B. M., Loman, D., & Belfiore, P. J. (1997). Effects of integrated picture mnemonics on letter recognition and letter-sound acquisition of transitional first grade students with special needs. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 33–42.Google Scholar
  6. Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1995). Effects of direct instruction in phonology native skills and foreign language aptitude of at-risk foreign language learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 107–120.Google Scholar
  7. Gunn, B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 90–103.Google Scholar
  8. Jannuzi, C. (1998). Literacy Across Cultures: Key Concepts in FL Literacy: Phonemic Awareness. Available at http://www2.aasa.ac.jp/~dcdycus/LAC98/FEB98/PHONOWA1.HTM
  9. Mastropieri, M. A., & Fulk, B. M. (1991). Teaching students ways to remember: Strategies for. Learning mnemonically. Cambridge: Brookline.Google Scholar
  10. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1998). Constructing more meaningful relationships in the classroom: Mnemonic research into practice. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 138–145.Google Scholar
  11. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1991). Teaching students ways to remember: Strategies for. Learning mnemonically. Cambridge: Brookline.Google Scholar
  12. National Research Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  13. Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., & Delaney, H. D. (1982). The mnemonic keyword strategy. Review of Educational Research, 52, 61–96.Google Scholar
  14. Sari, H. (2000). Development of special education provision in Turkey: From the inclusive perspective. Presented at ISEC Congress, 2000. Available at: http://www.isec2000.org.uk/abstracts/papers_s/sari_1.htm
  15. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Classroom applications of mnemonic instruction: Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. Exceptional Children, 58, 219–229.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, S. B., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1998). Phonological awareness: Research bases. In D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kameenui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs (pp. 61–128). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning difficulties: Affective or native language aptitude differences. Modern Language Journals, 75, 3–16.Google Scholar
  18. Stahl, S. A., Duffy-Hester, A. M., & Stahl, K. A. (1998). Everything you wanted to know about phonics (but where afraid to ask). Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 338–355.Google Scholar
  19. The Ministry of National Education Report (MEB) (1997).T¨rkiye’de Ozel Eğitime Muhtac Cocuklar ve Eğitimleri.’ Ankara; The Ministry of National Education Publication.Google Scholar
  20. Williams, J. (1995). Phonemic Awareness. In T. L. Harris & R. E. Hodges (Eds.), The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing (p. 185). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anadolu UniversityTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Special EducationMercyhurst CollegeErie
  3. 3.Education DivisionMercyhurst CollegeErie

Personalised recommendations