Advertisement

One-Month Stability of Cyberball Post-Exclusion Ostracism Distress in Adolescents

  • Charlie A. DavidsonEmail author
  • Cynthia J. Willner
  • Stefon J. R. van Noordt
  • Barbara C. Banz
  • Jia Wu
  • Joshua G. Kenney
  • Jason K. Johannesen
  • Michael J. Crowley
Article

Abstract

We examined one-month reliability, internal consistency, and validity of ostracism distress (Need Threat Scale) to simulated social exclusion during Cyberball. Thirty adolescents (13–18 yrs.) completed the Cyberball task, ostracism distress ratings, and measures of related clinical symptoms, repeated over one month. Need Threat Scale ratings of ostracism distress showed adequate test-retest reliability and internal consistency at both occasions. Construct validity was demonstrated via relationships with closely related constructs of anxiety, anxiety sensitivity, and emotion dysregulation, and weaker associations with more distal constructs of state paranoia and subclinical psychosis-like experiences. While ratings of ostracism distress and anxiety were significantly attenuated at retest, most participants continued to experience post-Cyberball ostracism distress at one-month follow-up, which indicates that the social exclusion induction of Cyberball persisted despite participants’ familiarity with the paradigm. Overall, results suggest that the primary construct of ostracism distress is preserved over repeated administration of Cyberball, with reliability sufficient for usage in longitudinal research. These findings have important implications for translating this laboratory simulation of social distress into developmental and clinical intervention studies.

Keywords

Ostracism Social exclusion Psychometrics Anxiety sensitivity Test-retest 

Notes

Funding

This research was supported by funding from NIDA K01 [redacted] to author [redacted], and funding from an NIH T32 [redacted]. The funding organization did not have a role in the design, implementation, analysis, or interpretation of this research.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Charlie A. Davidson, Cynthia J. Willner, Stefon J. R. van Noordt, Barbara C. Banz, Jia Wu, Joshua G. Kenney, Jason K. Johannesen, and Michael J. Crowley declare they have no conflict of interest.

Experiment Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the [redacted] Human Investigation Committee (HIC# 0104012378).

Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained for all 18-year-old participants, and written participant assent and parent/guardian consent were obtained for all participants under the age of 18 years.

References

  1. Adams, S. K., & Kisler, T. S. (2013). Sleep quality as a mediator between technology-related sleep quality, depression, and anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(1), 25–30.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. L., Steen, E., & Stavropoulos, V. (2017). Internet use and problematic internet use: A systematic review of longitudinal research trends in adolescence and emergent adulthood. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(4), 430–454.Google Scholar
  3. Birmaher, B., Khetarpal, S., Brent, D., Cully, M., Balach, L., Kaufman, J., & Neer, S. M. K. (1997). The screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED): Scale construction and psychometric characteristics. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(4), 545–553.Google Scholar
  4. Birmaher, B., Brent, D. A., Chiappetta, L., Bridge, J., Monga, S., & Baugher, M. (1999). Psychometric properties of the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED): A replication study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(10), 1230–1236.Google Scholar
  5. Bolling, D. Z., Pitskel, N. B., Deen, B., Crowley, M. J., Mayes, L. C., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2011a). Development of neural systems for processing social exclusion from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Science, 14(6), 1431–1444.Google Scholar
  6. Bolling, D. Z., Pitskel, N. B., Deen, B., Crowley, M. J., McPartland, J. C., Kaiser, M. D., et al. (2011b). Enhanced neural responses to rule violation in children with autism: A comparison to social exclusion. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(3), 280–294.Google Scholar
  7. Bolling, D. Z., Pitskel, N. B., Deen, B., Crowley, M. J., McPartland, J. C., Mayes, L. C., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2011c). Dissociable brain mechanisms for processing social exclusion and rule violation. NeuroImage, 54(3), 2462–2471.Google Scholar
  8. Bor, J., Brunelin, J., d'Amato, T., Costes, N., Suaud-Chagny, M.-F., Saoud, M., & Poulet, E. (2011). How can cognitive remediation therapy modulate brain activations in schizophrenia?: An fMRI study. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 192(3), 160–166.Google Scholar
  9. Brennan, G. M., Crowley, M. J., Wu, J., Mayes, L. C., & Baskin-Sommers, A. R. (2018). Neural processing of social exclusion in individuals with psychopathic traits: Links to anger and aggression. Psychiatry Research, 268, 263–271.Google Scholar
  10. Buckner, J. D., Dewall, C. N., Schmidt, N. B., & Maner, J. K. (2010). A tale of two threats: Social anxiety and attention to social threat as a function of social exclusion and non-exclusion threats. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34(5), 449–455.Google Scholar
  11. Bungert, M., Koppe, G., Niedtfeld, I., Vollstadt-Klein, S., Schmahl, C., Lis, S., & Bohus, M. (2015). Pain processing after social exclusion and its relation to rejection sensitivity in borderline personality disorder. PLoS One, 10(8), e0133693.Google Scholar
  12. Cacioppo, S., Frum, C., Asp, E., Weiss, R. M., Lewis, J. W., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2013). A quantitative meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of social rejection. Scientific Reports, 3.Google Scholar
  13. Campopiano, A., van Noordt, S. J. R., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2018). STATSLAB: An open-source EEG toolbox for computing single-subject effects using robust statistics. Behavioural Brain Research, 347, 425–435.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, Jacob, Cohen, Patricia, West, Stephen G, Aiken, Leone S (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441.
  15. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104.Google Scholar
  16. Crowley, M. J., Wu, J., McCarty, E. R., David, D. H., Bailey, C. A., & Mayes, L. C. (2009). Exclusion and micro-rejection: Event-related potential response predicts mitigated distress. Neuroreport, 20(17), 1518–1522.Google Scholar
  17. Crowley, M. J., Wu, J., McCreary, S., Miller, K., & Mayes, L. C. (2012). Implementation of false discovery rate for exploring novel paradigms and trait dimensions with ERPs. Developmental Neuropsychology, 37(6), 559–577.Google Scholar
  18. De Rubeis, J., Sutterlin, S., Lange, D., Pawelzik, M., van Randenborgh, A., Victor, D., & Vogele, C. (2016). Attachment status affects heart rate responses to experimental ostracism in inpatients with depression. PLoS One, 11(3), e0150375.Google Scholar
  19. Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An FMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290–292.Google Scholar
  20. Fam, J. Y. (2018). Prevalence of internet gaming disorder in adolescents: A meta‐analysis across three decades. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(5), 524-531.Google Scholar
  21. Gee, D. G., Karlsgodt, K. H., van Erp, T. G. M., Bearden, C. E., Lieberman, M. D., Belger, A., et al. (2012). Altered age-related trajectories of amygdala-prefrontal circuitry in adolescents at clinical high risk for psychosis: A preliminary study. Schizophrenia Research, 134(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  22. Gee, D. G., Humphreys, K. L., Flannery, J., Goff, B., Telzer, E. H., Shapiro, M., et al. (2013). A developmental shift from positive to negative connectivity in human amygdala–prefrontal circuitry. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(10), 4584–4593.Google Scholar
  23. Gradin, V. B., Waiter, G., Kumar, P., Stickle, C., Milders, M., Matthews, K., et al. (2012). Abnormal neural responses to social exclusion in schizophrenia. PLoS One, 7(8), e42608.Google Scholar
  24. Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2008). “Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale”: Erratum. Dec 2008. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 30(4), 315.Google Scholar
  25. Habel, U., Koch, K., Kellermann, T., Reske, M., Frommann, N., Wölwer, W., et al. (2010). Training of affect recognition in schizophrenia: Neurobiological correlates. Social Neuroscience, 5(1), 92–104.Google Scholar
  26. Hartgerink, C. H., van Beest, I., Wicherts, J. M., & Williams, K. D. (2015). The ordinal effects of ostracism: A meta-analysis of 120 Cyberball studies. PLoS One, 10(5), e0127002.Google Scholar
  27. Hökby, S., Hadlaczky, G., Westerlund, J., Wasserman, D., Balazs, J., Germanavicius, A., et al. (2016). Are mental health effects of internet use attributable to the web-based content or perceived consequences of usage? A longitudinal study of European adolescents. JMIR Mental Health, 3(3), e31.Google Scholar
  28. Hooker, C. I., Bruce, L., Fisher, M., Verosky, S. C., Miyakawa, A., D'Esposito, M., & Vinogradov, S. (2013). The influence of combined cognitive plus social-cognitive training on amygdala response during face emotion recognition in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 213(2), 99–107.Google Scholar
  29. Insel, Thomas, Cuthbert, Bruce, Garvey Marjorie, Heinssen Robert, Pine, Daniel S, Quinn, Kevin, ... Wang Philip. (2010). Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders: Am Psychiatric Assoc.Google Scholar
  30. Jenaro, C., Flores, N., Gómez-Vela, M., González-Gil, F., & Caballo, C. (2007). Problematic internet and cell-phone use: Psychological, behavioral, and health correlates. Addiction Research & Theory, 15(3), 309–320.Google Scholar
  31. Lee Uichin, Lee Joonwon, Ko Minsam, Lee Changhun, Kim Yuhwan, Yang Subin, ... Song, Junehwa. (2014). Hooked on smartphones: an exploratory study on smartphone overuse among college students. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, Toronto.Google Scholar
  32. Lincoln, T. M., Sundag, J., Schlier, B., & Karow, A. (2017). The relevance of emotion regulation in explaining why social exclusion triggers paranoia in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 44(4), 757–767.Google Scholar
  33. Maltby, N., Mayers, M. F., Allen, G. J., & Tolin, D. F. (2005). Anxiety sensitivity: Stability in prospective research. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 19(6), 708–716.Google Scholar
  34. Marsic, A., Broman-Fulks, J., & Berman, M. (2011). The effects of measurement frequency and timing on anxiety sensitivity scores. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 35(5), 463–468.Google Scholar
  35. Mazza, M., Lucci, G., Pacitti, F., Pino, M. C., Mariano, M., Casacchia, M., & Roncone, R. (2010). Could schizophrenic subjects improve their social cognition abilities only with observation and imitation of social situations? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(5), 675–703.Google Scholar
  36. McPartland, J. C., Crowley, M. J., Perszyk, D. R., Naples, A., Mukerji, C. E., Wu, J., et al. (2011). Temporal dynamics reveal atypical brain response to social exclusion in autism. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(3), 271–279.Google Scholar
  37. Meyer, A., Riesel, A., & Hajcak Proudfit, G. (2013). Reliability of the ERN across multiple tasks as a function of increasing errors. Psychophysiology, 50(12), 1220–1225.Google Scholar
  38. Perry, Y., Henry, J. D., Sethi, N., & Grisham, J. R. (2011). The pain persists: How social exclusion affects individuals with schizophrenia. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50(4), 339–349.Google Scholar
  39. Peters, A. L., Davidson, M. B., Schriger, D. L., & Hasselblad, V. (1996). A clinical approach for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: An analysis using glycosylated hemoglobin levels. Meta-analysis research group on the diagnosis of diabetes using glycated hemoglobin levels. Jama, 276(15), 1246–1252.Google Scholar
  40. Peters, E., Joseph, S., Day, S., & Garety, P. (2004). Measuring delusional ideation: The 21-item Peters et al. delusions inventory (PDI). Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(4), 1005–1022.Google Scholar
  41. Pinkham, A., Penn, D., & Harvey, P. (2017). Social cognition psychometric evaluation (scope): Results: Of the final validation study. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43, S224–S225.Google Scholar
  42. Popov, T., Jordanov, T., Rockstroh, B., Elbert, T., Merzenich, M. M., & Miller, G. A. (2011). Specific cognitive training normalizes auditory sensory gating in schizophrenia: A randomized trial. Biological Psychiatry, 69(5), 465–471.Google Scholar
  43. Popova, P., Popov, T. G., Wienbruch, C., Carolus, A. M., Miller, G. A., & Rockstroh, B. S. (2014). Changing facial affect recognition in schizophrenia: Effects of training on brain dynamics. Neuroimage Clinical, 6, 156–165.Google Scholar
  44. Premkumar, P., Onwumere, J., Albert, J., Kessel, D., Kumari, V., Kuipers, E., & Carretié, L. (2015). The relation between schizotypy and early attention to rejecting interactions: The influence of neuroticism. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 16(8), 587–601.Google Scholar
  45. Ramsey, A. T., & Jones, E. E. (2015). Minding the interpersonal gap: Mindfulness-based interventions in the prevention of ostracism. Consciousness and Cognition, 31, 24–34.Google Scholar
  46. Rotge, J. Y., Lemogne, C., Hinfray, S., Huguet, P., Grynszpan, O., Tartour, E., et al. (2015). A meta-analysis of the anterior cingulate contribution to social pain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(1), 19–27.Google Scholar
  47. Schlier, B., Moritz, S., & Lincoln, T. M. (2016). Measuring fluctuations in paranoia: Validity and psychometric properties of brief state versions of the paranoia checklist. Psychiatry Research, 241, 323–332.Google Scholar
  48. Sebastian, C. L., Tan, G. C. Y., Roiser, J. P., Viding, E., Dumontheil, I., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2011). Developmental influences on the neural bases of responses to social rejection: Implications of social neuroscience for education. NeuroImage, 57(3), 686–694.Google Scholar
  49. Shane, Scott. (2018). The fake americans Russia created to influence the election. From https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/us/politics/russia-facebook-twitter-election.html
  50. Silk, J. S., Stroud, L. R., Siegle, G. J., Dahl, R. E., Lee, K. H., & Nelson, E. E. (2012). Peer acceptance and rejection through the eyes of youth: Pupillary, eyetracking and ecological data from the chatroom interact task. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(1), 93–105.Google Scholar
  51. Silverman, W. K., Fleisig, W., Rabian, B., & Peterson, R. A. (1991). Childhood anxiety sensitivity index. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20, 162–168.Google Scholar
  52. Silverman, W. K., Goedhart, A. W., Barrett, P., & Turner, C. (2003). The facets of anxiety sensitivity represented in the childhood anxiety sensitivity index: Confirmatory analyses of factor models from past studies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(3), 364–374.Google Scholar
  53. Subramaniam, K., Luks, T. L., Fisher, M., Simpson, G. V., Nagarajan, S., & Vinogradov, S. (2012). Computerized cognitive training restores neural activity within the reality monitoring network in schizophrenia. Neuron, 73(4), 842–853.Google Scholar
  54. Taylor, S. F., Kang, J., Brege, I. S., Tso, I. F., Hosanagar, A., & Johnson, T. D. (2012). Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of emotion perception and experience in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 71(2), 136–145.Google Scholar
  55. van Beest, I., & Williams, K. D. (2006). When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 918–928.Google Scholar
  56. van Noordt, S. J. R., White, L. O., Wu, J., Mayes, L. C., & Crowley, M. J. (2015). Social exclusion modulates event-related frontal theta and tracks ostracism distress in children. NeuroImage, 118, 248–255.Google Scholar
  57. Vijayakumar, N., Cheng, T. W., & Pfeifer, J. H. (2017). Neural correlates of social exclusion across ages: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional MRI studies. NeuroImage, 153, 359–368.Google Scholar
  58. Westermann, S., Kesting, M.-L., & Lincoln, T. M. (2012). Being deluded after being excluded? How emotion regulation deficits in paranoia-prone individuals affect state paranoia during experimentally induced social stress. Behavior Therapy, 43(2), 329–340.Google Scholar
  59. White, L. O., Wu, J., Borelli, J. L., Rutherford, H. J., David, D. H., Kim-Cohen, J., et al. (2012). Attachment dismissal predicts frontal slow-wave ERPs during rejection by unfamiliar peers. Emotion, 12(4), 690–700.Google Scholar
  60. Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(2007), 425–452.Google Scholar
  61. Williams, K. D., & Jarvis, B. (2006). Cyberball: A program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, 38(1), 174–180.Google Scholar
  62. Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748–762.Google Scholar
  63. Wölwer, W., Brinkmeyer, J., Stroth, S., Streit, M., Bechdolf, A., Ruhrmann, S., et al. (2012). Neurophysiological correlates of impaired facial affect recognition in individuals at risk for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 38(5), 1021–1029.Google Scholar
  64. Yee, C. M., Mathis, K. I., Sun, J. C., Sholty, G. L., Lang, P. J., Bachman, P., et al. (2010). Integrity of emotional and motivational states during the prodromal, first-episode, and chronic phases of schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(1), 71–82.Google Scholar
  65. Zadro, L., Boland, C., & Richardson, R. (2006). How long does it last? The persistence of the effects of ostracism in the socially anxious. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 692–697.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charlie A. Davidson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cynthia J. Willner
    • 2
  • Stefon J. R. van Noordt
    • 2
  • Barbara C. Banz
    • 3
  • Jia Wu
    • 2
  • Joshua G. Kenney
    • 4
    • 5
  • Jason K. Johannesen
    • 4
    • 5
  • Michael J. Crowley
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Clinical PsychologyMercer University College of Health ProfessionsAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Yale Child Study CenterYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Department of Emergency MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  4. 4.Psychology ServiceVA Connecticut Healthcare SystemWest HavenUSA
  5. 5.Department of PsychiatryYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations