Advertisement

Grandiose-Manipulative, Callous-Unemotional, and Daring-Impulsive: the Prediction of Psychopathic Traits in Adolescence and their Outcomes in Adulthood

  • Henriette Bergstrøm
  • David P. Farrington
Article

Abstract

There has been much debate about how to measure psychopathic traits in adolescence. One of the main issues is whether one should focus on callous-unemotional (CU) traits alone, or CU traits in combination with Grandiose-Manipulative (GM) and Daring-Impulsive (DI) traits. The current study first investigates the extent to which youth who are high on CU traits are also high on GM and DI traits. In addition, the study investigates if being high on both CU and GM, and high on both CU and DI, identify groups that are particularly characterized by past and future impairments. To investigate this, data from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development (CSDD) was analyzed. The CSDD is a prospective longitudinal study of 411 English boys spanning over 50 years. The information available at age 12–14 was coded on the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD). Childhood risk factors were measured at age 8–10 and later life outcomes were measured at age 32. The results indicate that being high on CU in combination with DI delineates a clinically interesting group who are characterized by high childhood risk and poorer adult life outcomes. The same applied to the high CU/high GM group, but to a lesser extent.

Keywords

Psychopathic traits Risk factors Antisocial outcomes Longitudinal study Callous-unemotional 

Notes

Funding

The CSDD has been funded mainly by the UK Home Office and the UK Department of Health, UK National Programme on Forensic Mental Health. No conflict of interest reported.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for the interviews was granted by the Institute of Psychiatry, London University ethics committee. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

Authors Henriette Bergstrøm and David P. Farrington declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Fifth edition (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Andershed, H., Colins, O. F., Salekin, R. T., Lordos, A., Kyranides, M., Fanti, K. A. (2018). Callous-unemotional traits only versus the multidimensional psychopathy construct as predictors of various antisocial outcomes during early adolescence. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 40(1), 16-25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-018-9659-5.
  3. Ansel, L. L., Barry, C. T., Gillen, C. T. A., & Herrington, L. L. (2015). An analysis of four self-report measures of adolescent callous-unemotional traits: Exploring unique prediction of delinquency, aggression, and conduct problems. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auty, K. M., Farrington, D. P., & Coid, J. W. (2015). Intergenerational transmission of psychopathy and mediation via psychosocial risk factors. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 206, 26–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry, C. T., Frick, P. J., DeShazo, T. M., McCoy, M. G., Ellis, M., & Loney, B. R. (2000). The importance of callous-unemotional traits for extending the concept of psychopathy to children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 335–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergstrøm, H., Forth, A. E., & Farrington, D. P. (2016). The psychopath: Continuity or change? Stability of psychopathic traits and predictors of stability. In A. Kapardis & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), The psychology of crime, policing and courts (pp. 94–115). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Blais, J., Solodukhin, E., & Forth, A. E. (2014). A meta-analysis exploring the relationship between psychopathy and instrumental versus reactive violence. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 41, 797–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics note. Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ, 314, 572.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrd, A. L., Hawes, S. W., Loeber, R., & Pardini, D. A. (2016). Interpersonal callousness from childhood to adolescence: developmental trajectories and early risk factors. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, online first. 1‑16Google Scholar
  10. Christian, R. E., Frick, P. J., Hill, N. L., Tyler, L., & Frazer, D. R. (1997). Psychopathy and conduct problems in children: II. Implications for suptyping children with conduct problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child amd Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cleckley, H. (1941/1988). The mask of sanity: An attempt to clarify some issues about the so-called psychopathic personality (5th ed.). Atlanta: Emily Cleckley.Google Scholar
  12. Colins, O. F., & Vermeiren, R. R. J. (2013). The usefulness of DSM-IV and DSM-5 conduct disorder subtyping in detained adolescents. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201, 736–743.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Colins, O. F., Andershed, A., Hawes, S. W., Bijttebier, P., & Pardini, D. A. (2016a). Psychometric properties of the original and short form of the inventory of callous-unemotional traits in detained female adolescents. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 47, 679–690.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Colins, O. F., Fanti, K. A., Larsson, H., & Andershed, H. (2016b). Psychopathic traits in early childhood: further validation of the child problematic traits inventory. Assessment, 24, 602–614.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Colins, O. F., Fanti, K. A., Andershed, H., Mulder, E., Salekin, R. T., Blokland, A., & Vermeiren, R. R. J. M. (2017). Psychometric properties and prognostic usefulness of the youth psychopathic traits inventory (YPI) as a component of a clinical protocol for detained youth: A multiethnic examination. Psychological Assessment, 29, 740–753.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dadds, M. R., Fraser, J., Frost, A., & Hawes, D. J. (2005). Disentangling the underlying dimensions of psychopathy and conduct problems in childhood: A community study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 400–410.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Douglas, K. S., Epstein, M. E., & Poythress, N. G. (2008). Criminal recidivism among juvenile offenders: Testing the incremental and predictive validity of three measures of psychopathic features. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 423–438.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Edens, J. F., Campbell, J. S., & Weir, J. M. (2007). Youth psychopathy and criminal Recidivism: a meta-analysis of the psychopathy checklist measures. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 53–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Essau, C. A., Sasagawa, S., & Frick, P. J. (2006). Callous-unemotional traits in a community sample of adolescents. Assessment, 13, 454–469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Falkenbach, D. M., Poythress, N. G., & Heide, K. M. (2003). Psychopathic features in a juvenile diversion population: reliability and predictive validity of two self-report measures. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 787–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fanti, K. A., Kyranides, M. N., Georgiou, G., Petridou, M., Colins, O. F., Tuvblad, C., & Andershed, H. (2017). Callous-unemotional, impulsive-irresponsible, and grandiose-manipulative traits: distinct associations with heart rate, skin conductance, and startle response to violent and erotic scenes. Psychophysiology, online first, 54, 663–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farrington, D. P. (1995). The development of offending and antisocial behaviour from childhood: key findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 929–964.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Farrington, D. P. (2003). Key results from the first 40 years of the Cambridge study in delinquent development. In T. P. Thornberry & M. D. Krohn (Eds.), Taking stock of delinquency: An overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies (pp. 137–183). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farrington, D. P. (2005). The importance of child and adolescent psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Child and Adolescent Psychopathy, 33, 489–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Farrington, D. P., & Bergstrøm, H. (in press). Social origins of psychopathy. In A. R. Felthous & H. Sass (Eds.), International handbook on psychopathic disorders and the law, vol. 1: diagnosis and treatment (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Farrington, D. P., & Loeber, R. (2000). Some benefits of dichotomization in psychiatric and criminological research. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 10, 100–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Farrington, D. P., Coid, J. W., Harnett, L., Jolliffe, D., Soteriou, N., Turner, R. E., & West, D. J. (2006). Criminal careers up to age 50 and life success up to age 48: New findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development (2nd ed.). London: Home Office (Research Study 299).Google Scholar
  28. Farrington, D. P., Coid, J. W., & West, D. J. (2009). The development of offending from age 8 to age 50: recent results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Monatsschrift fur Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform (Journal of Criminology and Penal Reform), 92, 160–173.Google Scholar
  29. Farrington, D. P., Piquero, A. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2013). Offending from childhood to late middle age: Recent results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fink, B. C., Tant, A. S., Tremba, K., & Kiehl, K. A. (2012). Assessment of psychopathic traits in an incarcerated adolescent sample: a methodological comparison. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 971–986.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Fontaine, N. M. G., McCrory, E. J. P., Boivin, M., Moffitt, T. E., & Viding, E. (2011). Predictors and outcomes of joint trajectories of callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems in childhood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 730–742.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Forth, A. E., Kosson, D., & Hare, R. (2003). The Hare psychopathy checklist: Youth version. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  33. Frick, P. J. (2016). Current research on conduct disorder in children and adolescents. South Africa Journal of Psychology, 46, 160–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Frick, P. J., & Hare, R. D. (2001). Antisocial process screening device: APSD. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  35. Frick, P. J., & White, S. F. (2008). Research review: The importance of callous-unemotional traits for developmental models of aggressive and antisocial behavior. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 359–375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Frick, P. J., Cornell, A. H., Barry, C. T., Bodin, S. D., & Dane, H. E. (2003). Callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems in the prediction of conduct problem severity, aggression, and self-report of delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 457–470.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2014). Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 1–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Frogner, L., Gibson, C. L., Andershed, A-K., & Andershed, H. (2016). Childhood psychopathic personality and callous–unemotional traits in the prediction of conduct problems. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,88(2), 211–225.  https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000205.
  39. Frogner, L., Andershed, A-K., & Andershed, H. (2018). Psychopathic personality works better than CU traits for predicting fearlessness and ADHD symptoms among children with conduct problems. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 40(1), 26–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-018-9651-0
  40. Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: a conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 17, 1–13.Google Scholar
  41. Gillen, C. T. A., Barry, C. T., & Bater, L. R. (2016). Anxiety symptoms and coping motives: examining a potential path to substance use-related problems in adolescents with psychopathic traits. Substance Use and Misuse, 51, 1920–1929.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Gretton, H. M., Hare, R. D., & Catchpole, R. E. H. (2004). Psychopathy and offending from adolescence to adulthood: a 10-year follow up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 636–645.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hare, R. D. (1993). Without conscience: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2005). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy. Development, structural properties, and new directions. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 58–77). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  45. Hawes, S. W., Byrd, A. L., Waller, R., Lynam, D. R., & Pardini, D. A. (2016). Late childhood interpersonal callousness and conduct problem trajectories interact to predict adult psychopathy. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(1), 55–63.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12598.
  46. Hemphill, J. F., Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1994). Psychopathy and substance use. Journal of Personality Disorders, 8, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kahn, R. E., Frick, P. J., Youngstrom, E., Findling, R. L., & Yongstrom, J. K. (2012). The effects of including a callous-unemotional specifier for the diagnosis of conduct disorder. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 271–282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kennealy, P. J., Skeem, J. L., Walters, G. D., & Camp, J. (2010). Do core interpersonal and affective traits of PCL-R psychopathy interact with antisocial behavior and disinhibition to predict violence? Psychological Assessment, 22, 569–580.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kiehl, K. A., & Hoffman, M. B. (2011). The criminal psychopath: History, neuroscience, treatment, and economics. Jurimetrics, 51, 355–397.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Lee, Z. V., Hart, S. D., & Corrado, R. R. (2003). The validity of the antisocial process screening device as a self-report measure of psychopathy in adolescent offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 771–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lee-Rowland, L. M., Barry, C. T., Gillen, C. T. A., & Hansen, L. K. (2017). How do different dimensions of adolescent narcissism impact the relation between callous-unemotional traits and self-reported aggression? Aggressive Behavior, 43, 14–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mailloux, D. L., Forth, A. E., & Kroner, D. G. (1997). Psychopathy and substance use in adolescent male offenders. Psychological Reports, 81, 529–530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. McMahon, R. J., Witkiewitz, K., & Kotler, J. S. (2010). Predictive validity of callous-unemotional traits measured in early adolescence with respect to multiple antisocial outcomes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 752–263.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Life-course persistent and adolescent limited antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Munoz, L. C., & Frick, P. J. (2007). The reliability, stability, and predictive utility of the self-report version of the antisocial process screening device. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 299–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Salekin, R. T. (2008). Psychopathy and recidivism from mid-adolescence to young adulthood: Cumulating legal problems and limiting life opportunities. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 386–395.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Salekin, R. T. (2016a). Psychopathy in childhood: Why should we care about grandiose manipulative and daring-impulsive traits? The British Journal of Psychiatry, 209, 189–191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Salekin, R. T. (2016b). Psychopathy in childhood: Toward better informing the DSM-5 and ICD-11 conduct disorder specifiers. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7, 180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Salekin, R. T. (2017). Research review: what do we know about psychopathic traits in children? The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(11), 1180–1200.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12738.
  60. Salekin, R. T., & Lynam, D. R. (2010). Child and adolescent psychopathy: An introduction. In R. T. Salekin & D. R. Lynam (Eds.), Handbook of child and adolescent psychopathy (pp. 1–12). New York: Thje Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  61. Salihovic, S., & Stattin, H. (2016). Psychopathic traits and delinquency trajectories in adolescence. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scheepers, F. E., Buitelaar, J. K., & Matthys, W. (2011). Conduct disorder and the specifier callous and unemotional traits in the DSM-5. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 20, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Seagrave, D., & Grisso, T. (2002). Adolescent development and the measurement of juvenile psychopathy. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 219–239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith, S. S., & Newman, J. P. (1990). Alcohol and drug abuse-dependence disorders in psychopathic and nonpsychopathic criminal offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 430–439.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Spurk, D., Keller, A. C., & Hirschi, A. (2015). Do bad guys get ahead or fall behind? Relationships of the dark triad of personality with objective and subjective career success. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ullrich, S., Farrington, D. P., & Coid, J. W. (2008). Psychopathic personality traits and life success. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1162–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Geel, M., Toprak, F., Goemans, A., Zwaanswijk, W, & Vedder, P. (2016). Are youth psychopathic traits related to bullying? Meta-analyses on callous-unemotional traits, narcissism, and impulsivity. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 48(5), 768–777. Google Scholar
  69. Van Ginkel, J. R., van der Ark, L. A., & Sijtsma, K. (2007). Multiple imputation of item scores in test and questionnaire data, and influence on psychometric results. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 387–414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Verona, E., Sprague, J., & Javdani, S. (2012). Gender and factor-level interactions in psychopathy: Implications for self-directed violence risk and borderline personality disorder symptoms. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vitacco, M. J., Rogers, R., & Neumann, C. S. (2003). The Antisocial Process Screening Device. An examination of its construct and criterion-related validity. Assessment, 10, 143–150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Waller, R., Gardner, F., & Hyde, L. W. (2013). What are the associations between parenting, callous-unemotional traits, and antisocial behavior in youth? A systematic review of evidence. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 593–608.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Waller, R., Hyde, L. W., Grabell, A. S., Alves, M. L., & Olson, S. L. (2015). Differential associations of early callous-unemotional, oppositional, and ADHD behaviors: Multiple domains within early-starting conduct problems. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 657–666.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Waller, R., Baskin-Sommers, A. R., & Hyde, L. W. (2016). Examining predictors of callous unemotional traits trajectories across adolescence among high-risk males. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1102070
  75. Walsh, Z., & Kosson, D. S. (2008). Psychopathy and violence: the importance of factor level interactions. Psychological Assessment, 20, 114–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesUniversity of DerbyDerbyUK
  2. 2.Institute of CriminologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations