Psychometric Properties of the Response to Anxiety Questionnaire
Recent research highlights the importance of transdiagnostic factors of psychopathology, particularly in understanding comorbidity. Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) is one such factor, which may elucidate anxiety-depression comorbidity. The Response to Anxiety Questionnaire (RAQ) aims to evaluate repetitive negative thinking (RNT) related to anxiety-depression comorbidity, specifically hopelessness and rumination about anxiety symptoms. Anxious hopelessness is negative thoughts about the future due to anxiety symptoms, and anxious rumination includes negative evaluations of the meaning of anxiety symptoms, therefore the current study assessed the RAQ in three studies. We used exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis methodologies to examine the factor structure of the RAQ. In addition, we tested indirect effects of the two factors of RAQ (Rumination and Hopelessness) between anxiety and depression, and tested measure convergent validity. Results of the current study provide additional support for the psychometric properties of the RAQ, suggesting a two factor makeup (hopelessness, rumination), as well as its use in predicting anxiety and depressive symptoms.
KeywordsAnxiety Depression Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) Response to anxiety questionnaire
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of Interest
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: a theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96(2), 358–372.Google Scholar
- Abramson, L. Y., Alloy, L. B., Hogan, M. E., Whitehouse, W. G., Gibb, B. E., Hankin, B. L., & Cornette, M. M. (2000). The hopelessness theory of suicidality. In T. E. Joiner & M. D. Rudd (Eds.), Suicide Science (pp. 17–32). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
- Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international symposium on information theory (pp. 267–281). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.Google Scholar
- Alloy, L. B., Kelly, K. A., Mineka, S., & Clements, C. M. (1990). Comorbidity of anxiety and depressive disorders: A helplessness/hopelessness perspective. In J. D. Maser & C. R. Cloninger (Eds.), Comorbidity of anxiety and mood disorders. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Simple second order Chi square correction. Technical report. www.statmodel.com.
- Brown, T. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
- Comrey, A. L. & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. A.L. Comrey & H.B. Lee. (Eds.) New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Fresco, D. M., Mennin, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2003). Using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire to identify individuals with generalized anxiety disorder: A receiver operating characteristic analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34(3–4), 283–291.Google Scholar
- Grant, D. M., Judah, M. R., Mills, A. C., Lechner, W. V., Davidson, C. L., & Wingate, L. R. (2014). Rumination and excessive reassurance seeking: Mediators of the relationship between social anxiety and depression? Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(3), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9399-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (2016). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behavior Research and Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001
- Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., & Wang, P. (2010). Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(7), 748–751Google Scholar
- Johansson, R., Carlbring, P., Heedman, Å., Paxling, B., & Andersson, G. (2013). Depression, anxiety and their comorbidity in the Swedish general population: point prevalence and the effect on health-related quality of life. PeerJ, 1, e98. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.98 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Jöreskog, K. G. (1999). How large can a standardized coefficient be. Unpublished Technical Report. Retrieved from: http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/HowLargeCanaStandardizedCoefficientbe.pdf.
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Lee, I. A. & Preacher, K. J. (2013). Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org
- Lenze, E. J., Mulsant, B. H., Mohlman, J., Shear, M. K., Dew, M. A., Schulz, R., & Reynolds, C. F. (2005). Generalized anxiety disorder in late life: lifetime course and comorbidity with major depressive disorder. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13(1), 77–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mansell, W., Harvey, A., Watkins, E. R., & Shafran, R. (2008). Cognitive behavioral processes across psychological disorders: a review of the utility and validity of the transdiagnostic approach. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 1(3), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1521/ijct.2008.1.3.181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McEvoy, P. M., Watson, H., Watkins, E. R., & Nathan, P. (2013). The relationship between worry, rumination, and comorbidity: Evidence for repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic construct. Journal of Affective Disorders, 151(1), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.06.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McLean, C. P., Asnaani, A., Litz, B. T., & Hofmann, S. G. (2011). Gender differences in anxiety disorders: Prevalence, course of illness, comorbidity and burden of illness. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(8), 1027–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.03.006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Muthen, B., & Kaplan, D. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: a note on the size of the model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1992.tb00975.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus. Statistical analysis with latent variables. Version, 3. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). Mplus user's guide. Sixth edition. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Muthén, B., du Toit, S., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equation in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
- Newman, M. G., & Llera, S. J. (2011). A novel theory of experiential avoidance in generalized anxiety disorder: a review and synthesis of research supporting a contrast avoidance model of worry. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 371–382.Google Scholar
- Penninx, B. W., Nolen, W. A., Lamers, F., Zitman, F. G., Smit, J. H., Spinhoven, P., et al. (2011). Two-year course of depressive and anxiety disorders: results from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). Journal of Affective Disorders, 133(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R. E., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Taylor, S., Arabian, B., & Fedoroff, I. C. (1999). Anxiety sensitivity: progress, prospects, and challenges. Anxiety Sensitivity: Theory, Research, and Treatment of the Fear of Anxiety, 339–353.Google Scholar