Advertisement

Assessment of Psychopathic Traits in Singaporean Adolescents: Validation of the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD)

  • Xiang Li
  • Wei Teng Chan
  • Rebecca P. Ang
  • Vivien S. Huan
Article

Abstract

There is little knowledge available concerning psychopathic traits in Asian adolescents; a lack of a suitable measurement instrument for assessing psychopathy in Asian societies may account for this. This study aimed to validate a widely used scale in the West — the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) — in Singaporean school-based and at-risk adolescents. Using an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), this study examined the two-factor (i.e., grandiose-manipulative/impulsive traits and callous-unemotional traits) and three-factor (i.e., grandiose-manipulative traits, impulsivity, and callous-unemotional traits) models of the APSD in 1027 school-based and 113 at-risk adolescents. School samples are adolescents from three secondary schools, while at-risk samples are adolescents who manifest different types of delinquent behaviors and are either placed in more structured settings or need closer supervision although they have not violated the law. Gender invariance was further tested in the school-based sample by conducting a multigroup CFA. The convergent validity of the APSD was also investigated in the school-based sample. For the school-based adolescents, the APSD revealed that the three-factor model provided a superior fit over the two-factor model and the factorial invariance across gender. Significant relationships between the three dimensions of the APSD and aggression and delinquency support the convergent validity of the APSD. As for the at-risk adolescents, both the two- and three-factor models were acceptable, but the two-factor model was preferred as it was parsimonious and it aligned with the conceptualized characteristics of psychopathic traits. Findings suggest that the APSD is a reliable and sound instrument for measuring psychopathic traits in Asian school-based and at-risk adolescents.

Keywords

Psychopathic traits Adolescents Validation Factor analysis Gender invariance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Data for this paper was obtained from two separate research projects funded from different sources. We acknowledge the funding support from both sources - the Ministry of Education (Singapore) AcRF Tier 2 grant (MOE2012-T2-1-079) and the Ministry of Social and Family Development (Singapore) Family Research Fund grant (2008-03), both awarded to Principal Investigator, Rebecca P. Ang.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Xiang Li Declares that she Has no Conflict of Interest. Wei Teng Chan Declares that she Has no Conflict of Interest. Rebecca P. Ang Declares that she Has no Conflict of Interest. Vivien S. Huan Declares that she Has no Conflict of Interest.

Experiment Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministry of Education (Singapore) AcRF Tier 2 grant (MOE2012-T2–1-079) and the Ministry of Social and Family Development (Singapore) Family Research Fund grant (2008–03).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Andershed, H., Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Levander, S. (2002). Psychopathic traits in non-referred youths: a new assessment tool. In E. Blauuw & L. Sheridan (Eds.), Psychopaths: current international perspectives (pp. 131–158). The Hague: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Ang, R. P., & Raine, A. (2009). Reliability, validity and invariance of the narcissistic personality questionnaire for children-revised (NPQC-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31, 143–151. doi: 10.1007/s10862-008-9112-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ang, R. P., Rescorla, L. A., Achenbach, T. M., Ooi, Y. P., Fung, D. S., & Woo, B. (2012). Examining the criterion validity of CBCL and TRF problem scales and items in a large Singapore sample. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 43, 70–86. doi: 10.1007/s10578-011-0253-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Asscher, J. J., van Vugt, E. S., Stams, G. J. J., Deković, M., Eichelsheim, V. I., & Yousfi, S. (2011). The relationship between juvenile psychopathic traits, delinquency and (violent) recidivism: a meta-analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 1134–1143. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02412.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bezdjian, S., Raine, A., Baker, L. A., & Lynam, D. R. (2011a). Psychopathic personality in children: genetic and environmental contributions. Psychological Medicine, 41, 589–600. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000966.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bezdjian, S., Tuvblad, C., Raine, A., & Baker, L. A. (2011b). The genetic and environmental covariation among psychopathic personality traits, and reactive and proactive aggression in childhood. Child Development, 82, 1267–1281. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01598.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bijttebier, P., & Decoene, S. (2009). Assessment of psychopathic traits in children and adolescents: further validation of the antisocial process screening device and the childhood psychopathy scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 157–163. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.25.3.157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Caputo, A. A., Frick, P. J., & Brodsky, S. L. (1999). Family violence and juvenile sex offending: the potential mediating role of psychopathic traits and negative attitudes toward women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 338–356. doi: 10.1177/0093854899026003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, P. Y., & Popovich, P. M. (2002). Correlation: parametric and nonparametric measures. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, B. R. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cleckley, H. (1941). The mask of sanity. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
  14. Colins, O. F., Bijttebier, P., Broekaert, E., & Andershed, H. (2014). Psychopathic-like traits among detained female adolescents: reliability and validity of the antisocial process screening device and the youth psychopathic traits inventory. Assessment, 21, 195–209. doi: 10.1177/1073191113481997.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (1999). Psychopathy across cultures: North America and Scotland compared. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 58–68. doi: 10.1037//0021-843X.108.1.58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. De Wied, M., van der Baan, H., Raaijmakers, Q., de Ruiter, C., & Meeus, W. (2014). Factor structure and construct validity of the Dutch version of the antisocial process screening device. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36, 84–92. doi: 10.1007/s10862-013-9371-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dong, L., Wu, H., & Waldman, I. D. (2014). Measurement and structural invariance of the antisocial process screening device. Psychological Assessment, 26, 598–608. doi: 10.1037/a0035139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Douglas, K. S., Epstein, M. E., & Poythress, N. G. (2008). Criminal recidivism among juvenile offenders: testing the incremental and predictive validity of three measures of psychopathic features. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 423–438. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9114-8.
  19. Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., Cruise, K. R., & Cauffman, E. (2001). Assessment of “juvenile psychopathy” and its association with violence: a critical review. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19, 53–80. doi: 10.1002/bsl.425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Essau, C. A., Sasagawa, S., & Frick, P. J. (2006). Callous-unemotional traits in a community sample of adolescents. Assessment, 13, 454–469. doi: 10.1177/1073191106287354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Falkenbach, D. M., Poythress, N. G., & Heide, K. M. (2003). Psychopathic features in a juvenile diversion population: reliability and predictive validity of two self-report measures. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 787–805. doi: 10.1002/bsl.562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fite, P. J., Greening, L., Stoppelbein, L., & Fabiano, G. A. (2009a). Confirmatory factor analysis of the antisocial process screening device with a clinical inpatient population. Assessment, 16, 103–114. doi: 10.1177/1073191108319893.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fite, P. J., Stoppelbein, L., & Greening, L. (2009b). Proactive and reactive aggression in a child psychiatric inpatient population relations to psychopathic characteristics. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 481–493. doi: 10.1177/0093854809332706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flight, J. I., & Forth, A. E. (2007). Instrumentally violent youths: the roles of psychopathic traits, empathy, and attachment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 739–751. doi: 10.1177/0093854807299462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frick, P. J., O’Brien, B. J., Wootton, J. M., & McBurnett, K. (1994). Psychopathy and conduct problems in children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 700–707. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.103.4.700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Frick, P. J., Bodin, S. D., & Barry, C. T. (2000). Psychopathic traits and conduct problems in community and clinic-referred samples of children: further development of the psychopathy screening device. Psychological Assessment, 12, 382–393. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.12.4.382.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Frick, P. J., Cornell, A. H., Barry, C. T., Bodin, S. D., & Dane, H. E. (2003). Callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems in the prediction of conduct problem severity, aggression, and self-report of delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 457–470. doi: 10.1023/A:1023899703866.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2014). Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1–57. doi: 10.1037/a0033076.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fung, A. L., Gao, Y., & Raine, A. (2010). The utility of the child and adolescent psychopathy construct in Hong Kong, China. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39, 134–140. doi: 10.1080/15374410903401138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geiser, C. (2012). Data analysis with Mplus. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Goodwin, B. E., Sellbom, M., & Salekin, R. T. (2015). Elucidating the construct validity of the antisocial process screening device (APSD) in a sample of young adults. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37, 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10862-014-9444-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the hare psychopathy checklist-revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  34. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jöreskog, K. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL. In Technical report. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc..Google Scholar
  36. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2004). LISREL 8.7 for Windows [computer software]. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc..Google Scholar
  37. Kimonis, E. R., Frick, P. J., Munoz, L. C., & Aucoin, K. J. (2007). Can a laboratory measure of emotional processing enhance the statistical prediction of aggression and delinquency in detained adolescents with callous-unemotional traits? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 773–785. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9136-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  39. Kotler, J. S., & McMahon, R. J. (2010). Assessment of child and adolescent psychopathy. In R. T. Salekin & R. Lynam (Eds.), Handbook of child and adolescent psychopathy (pp. 79–109). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lee, Z., Vincent, G. M., Hart, S. D., & Corrado, R. R. (2003). The validity of the antisocial process screening device as a self-report measure of psychopathy in adolescent offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 771–786. doi: 10.1002/bsl.561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Loney, B. R., Taylor, J., Butler, M. A., & Iacono, W. G. (2007). Adolescent psychopathy features: 6-year temporal stability and the prediction of externalizing symptoms during the transition to adulthood. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 242–252. doi: 10.1002/ab.20184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Luo, W., Hogan, D. J., Yeung, A. S., Sheng, Y. Z., & Aye, K. M. (2014). Attributional beliefs of Singapore students: relations to self-construal, competence and achievement goals. Educational Psychology, 34, 154–170. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.785056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lynam, D. R. (1997). Pursuing the psychopath: capturing the fledgling psychopath in a nomological net. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 425–438. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.106.3.425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lynam, D. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2007). Longitudinal evidence that psychopathy scores in early adolescence predict adult psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 155–165. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.155.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Lynam, D. R., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2008). The stability of psychopathy from adolescence into adulthood the search for moderators. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 228–243. doi: 10.1177/0093854807310153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Md-Yunus, S. (2005). Childcare practices in three Asian countries. International Journal of Early Childhood Education, 37, 39–56. doi: 10.1007/BF03165831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Muñoz, L. C., & Frick, P. J. (2007). The reliability, stability, and predictive utility of the self-report version of the antisocial process screening device. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 299–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00560.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Pechorro, P., Goncalves, R. A., Maroco, J., Gama, A. P., Neves, S., & Nunes, C. (2014). Juvenile delinquency and psychopathic traits: an empirical study with Portuguese adolescents. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 174–189. doi: 10.1177/0306624X12465584.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pechorro, P., Ray, J. V., Raine, A., Maroco, J., & Gonçalves, R. A. (2015). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire validation among a Portuguese sample of incarcerated juvenile delinquents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. doi: 10.1177/0886260515590784.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Perenc, L., & Radochonski, M. (2014). Psychopathic traits and reactive-proactive aggression in large community sample of polish adolescents. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 45, 464–471. doi: 10.1007/s10578-013-0432-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Poulin, F., & Chan, A. (2010). Stability and changes in children and adolescents friendships. Developmental Review, 30, 257–272. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2009.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Poythress, N. G., Dembo, R., Wareham, J., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2006a). Construct validity of the youth psychopathic traits inventory (YPI) and the antisocial process screening device (APSD) with justice-involved adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 26–55. doi: 10.1177/0093854805282518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Poythress, N. G., Douglas, K. S., Falkenbach, D., Cruise, K., Lee, Z., Murrie, D. C., & Vitacco, M. (2006b). Internal consistency reliability of the self-report antisocial process screening device. Assessment, 13, 107–113. doi: 10.1177/1073191105284279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Raine, A., Dodge, K., Rolf, L., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Chandra, R., et al. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire: differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159–171. doi: 10.1002/ab.20115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosan, A. M., & Costea-Barlutiu, C. (2013). Associations between callous-unemotional traits, aggression and psychopathology in detained adolescent males. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 13, 397–407.Google Scholar
  57. Salekin, R. T. (2008). Psychopathy and recidivism from mid-adolescence to young adulthood: cumulating legal problems and limiting life opportunities. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 386–395. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.386.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Salekin, R. T. (2016a). Psychopathy in childhood: toward better informing the DSM–5 and ICD-11 conduct disorder specifiers. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research and Treatment, 7, 180–191. doi: 10.1037/per0000150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Salekin, R. T. (2016b). Psychopathy in childhood: why should we care about grandiose–manipulative and daring-impulsive traits? The British Journal of Psychiatry, 209, 189–191. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.179051.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Salekin, R. T., & Lynam, R. (2010). Child and adolescent psychopathy: an introduction. In R. T. Salekin & R. Lynam (Eds.), Handbook of child and adolescent psychopathy (pp. 1–14). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  61. Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., Ustad, K. L., & Sewell, K. W. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism among female inmates. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 109–128. doi: 10.1023/A:1025780806538.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Seagrave, D., & Grisso, T. (2002). Adolescent development and the measurement of juvenile psychopathy. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 219–239. doi: 10.1023/A:1014696110850.
  63. Seals, R. W., Sharp, C., Ha, C., & Michonski, J. D. (2012). The relationship between the youth psychopathic traits inventory and psychopathology in a US community sample of male youth. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 232–243. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.650303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vazire, S., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Impulsivity and the self-defeating behavior of narcissists. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 154–165. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Verona, E., Sadeh, N., & Javdani, S. (2010). The influences of gender and culture on child and adolescent psychopathy. In R. Salekin & D. Lynam (Eds.), Handbook of child and adolescent psychopathy (pp. 317–342). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  67. Vincent, G. M., & Hart, S. D. (2002). Psychopathy in childhood and adolescence: implications for the assessment and management of multi-problem youths. In R. R. Corrado, R. Roesch, S. D. Hart, & J. K. Gierowski (Eds.), Multi-problem youth: a foundation for comparative research on needs, interventions, and outcomes (pp. 150–163). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  68. Vitacco, M. J., Rogers, R., & Neumann, C. S. (2003). The antisocial process screening device: an examination of its construct and criterion-related validity. Assessment, 10, 143–150. doi: 10.1177/1073191103010002005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychological Studies Academic Group, National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations