Skip to main content
Log in

Construct Validity of the Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale: Factor Structure, Convergent and Discriminant Validity

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale (ACSS) assesses one of three main constructs in the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide but evidence of its validity is limited. In two studies (Ns = 287 and 738) validity of the full 20-item ACSS and its shorter versions (ACSS-5, ACSS-8, ACSS-FAD) were examined in terms of factor structure and relation to indices of self-reported suicidal behaviour and self-harm. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) failed to show good fit for one-, two-, or three-factor models of the ACSS in its various versions. Exploratory factor analysis of the 20-item scale in the first study pointed instead to a five-factor structure and this was supported using CFA in the second study. In both studies all scale versions showed moderate negative correlations to fear of death and dying, indicating scale validity for the purpose of assessing fearlessness about death. In the second study, a model in which the five factors were indicators of a latent variable of Capability was found to predict a latent variable of Suicidality as indicated by suicidal behaviours, but the prediction was substantially enhanced by the addition of Item 20 to the model. This single item was also found in the first study to better predict suicidal and self-harming behaviour than the full ACSS or any of its short versions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A reviewer of the original manuscript commented that, rather than using the criterion of .326 to define a variable as loading on a factor, a criterion of .4 should be used. We reanalysed the data using a .4 cut-off. This new model necessarily accounted for fewer items in the ACSS and did not include a factor that we have termed Fearlessness of Dying. This factor appeared in the Smith et al. (2013a, b) study (although not under that name) and was replicated in Study 2 (see below). We consider that a factor that appears in three independent samples is worth including in describing the factor structure of the scale and have continued to use the criterion of .326.

References

  • Anestis, M. D., Bender, T. W., Selby, E. A., Ribeiro, J. D., & Joiner, T. E. (2011). Sex and emotion in the acquired capability for suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 15(2), 172–182. doi:10.1080/13811118.2011.566058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, T. W., Gordon, K. H., Bresin, K., & Joiner, T. E. (2011). Impulsivity and suicidality: the mediating role of painful and provocative experiences. Journal of Affective Disorders, 129, 301–307. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(1), 111–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, C. J., Morrow, C. E., Anestis, M. D., & Joiner, T. E. (2010). A preliminary test of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior in a military sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(3), 347–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. R., & Fillingim, R. B. (2007). Self-reported pain sensitivity: lack of correlation with pain threshold and tolerance. European Journal of Pain, 11(5), 594–598. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.09.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. C., Hessel, E. T., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Clarifying the role of pain tolerance in suicidal capability. Psychiatry Research, 189(3), 362–367. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.08.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23. doi:10.1037/a0014694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joiner, T. E. (2005). Why people die by suicide. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joiner, T. E., Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., & Rudd, M. D. (2009). The interpersonal theory of suicide: guidance for working with suicidal clients. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kene, P., & Hovey, J. D. (2014). Predictors of suicide attempt status: acquired capability, ideation, and reasons. Psychiatric Quarterly, 85(4), 427–437. doi:10.1007/s11126-014-9302-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2007). Factor analysis in personality research. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, D. (1990). The Collett-Lester fear of death scale: the original version and a revision. Death Studies, 14(5), 451–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, D. C., & O’Gorman, J. (2001). Construct validity of the revised Collett-Lester fear of death and dying scale. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 43(2), 157–174. doi:10.2190/13PW-QPFY-B1PB-2AQA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, M. K., Borges, G., Bromet, E. J., Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M., Beautrais, A., et al. (2008). Cross-national prevalence and risk factors for suicidal ideation, plans and attempts. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 192, 98–105. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.040113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paykel, E. S., Myers, J. K., Lindenthal, J. J., & Tanner, J. (1974). Suicidal feelings in the general population: a prevalence study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 124(582), 460–469. doi:10.1192/bjp.124.5.460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, J. D., & Joiner, T. E. (2009). The interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior: current status and future directions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(12), 1291–1299. doi:10.1002/jclp.20621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, J. D., Witte, T. K., Van Orden, K. A., Selby, E. A., Gordon, K. H., Bender, T. W., & Joiner Jr., T. E. (2014). Fearlessness about death: the psychometric properties and construct validity of the revision to the acquired capability for suicide scale. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 115–126. doi:10.1037/a0034858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rimkeviciene, J., Hawgood, J., O’Gorman, J., & De Leo, D. (2015). Assessment of acquired capability for suicide in clinical practice. Psychology, Health & Medicine. doi:10.1080/13548506.2015.1115108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A Beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New Jersey: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, R., Klayich, M., & McLean, J. (1995). Suicidal ideation and behaviours among university students in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 29(3), 473–479. doi:10.3109/00048679509064956.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. N., & Cukrowicz, K. C. (2010). Capable of suicide: a functional model of the acquired capability component of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide. Suicide and Life-threatening Behavior, 40(3), 266–274. doi:10.1521/suli.2010.40.3.266.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. N., Cukrowicz, K. C., Poindexter, E. K., Hobson, V., & Cohen, L. M. (2010). The acquired capability for suicide: a comparison of suicide attempters, suicide ideators, and non-suicidal controls. Depression and Anxiety, 27, 871–877. doi:10.1002/da.20701.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. R., Fink, E. L., Anestis, M. D., Ribeiro, J. D., Gordon, K. H., Davis, H., et al. (2013a). Exercise caution: over-exercise is associated with suicidality among individuals with disordered eating. Psychiatry Research, 206(2–3), 246–255. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.11.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. N., Wolford-Clevenger, C., Mandracchia, J. T., & Jahn, D. R. (2013b). An exploratory factor analysis of the acquired capability for suicide scale in male prison inmates. Psychological Services, 10(1), 97–105. doi:10.1037/a0030817.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, M. E., & Smith, G. T. (2009). Construct validity: advances in theory and methodology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 1. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153639.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6 ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Gordon, K. H., Bender, T. W., & Joiner, T. E. J. (2008). Suicidal desire and the capability for suicide: tests of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior among adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(1), 72–83. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.76.1.72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Cukrowicz, K. C., Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2010). The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychological Review, 117(2), 575–600. doi:10.1037/a0018697.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel, S., Vocks, S., Edel, M.-A., Nyhuis, P., Willutzki, U., & Teismann, T. (2014). Validation and psychometric properties of the German capability for suicide questionnaire. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55(5), 1292–1302. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.03.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolford-Clevenger, C., Febres, J., Zapor, H., Elmquist, J., Bliton, C., & Stuart, G. L. (2015). Interpersonal violence, alcohol use, and acquired capability for suicide. Death Studies, 39(4), 234–241. doi:10.1080/07481187.2014.985405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wyder, M., & De Leo, D. (2007). Behind impulsive suicide attempts: indications from a community study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 104, 167–173. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2007.02.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 432–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jurgita Rimkeviciene.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Jurgita Rimkeviciene, Jacinta Hawgood, John O’Gorman and Diego De Leo declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Experiment Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rimkeviciene, J., Hawgood, J., O’Gorman, J. et al. Construct Validity of the Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale: Factor Structure, Convergent and Discriminant Validity. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 39, 291–302 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9576-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9576-4

Keywords

Navigation