Advertisement

Photographic Assessment of Change in Trichotillomania: Psychometric Properties and Variables Influencing Interpretation

  • David C. HoughtonEmail author
  • Maddison R. Franklin
  • Michael P. Twohig
  • Martin E. Franklin
  • Scott N. Compton
  • Angela M. Neal-Barnett
  • Stephen M. Saunders
  • Douglas W. Woods
Article
  • 167 Downloads

Abstract

Although photographic assessment has been found to be reliable in assessing hair loss in Trichotillomania, the validity of this method is unclear, particularly for gauging progress in treatment. The current study evaluated the psychometric properties of photographic assessment of change in Trichotillomania. Photographs showing hair loss of adults with Trichotillomania were taken before and after participating in a clinical trial for the condition. Undergraduate college students (N = 211) rated treatment response according to the photos, and additional archival data on hair pulling severity and psychosocial health were retrieved from the clinical trial. Photographic assessment of change was found to possess fair reliability (ICC = 0.53), acceptable criterion validity (r = 0.51), good concurrent validity (r = 0.30–0.36), and excellent incremental validity (ΔR 2 = 8.67, p < 0.01). In addition, photographic measures were significantly correlated with change in quality of life (r = 0.42), and thus could be considered an index of the social validity of Trichotillomania treatment. Gender of the photo rater and pulling topography affected the criterion validity of photographic assessment (partial η 2 = 0.05–0.11). Recommendations for improving photographic assessment and future directions for hair pulling research are discussed.

Keywords

Hair pulling Psychometrics Assessment Behavioral observation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Research reported in this paper was supported by the NIMH of the National Institutes of Health under Award number R01MH080966 (Woods, PI). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors would like to thank the Trichotillomania Leaning Center for assisting in recruiting as well as the participants in this study. The authors would also like to thank Steve Hayes, Thilo Deckersbach, Flint Espil, Mike Walther, Chris Bauer, Shawn Cahill, Jason Levine, Emily Ricketts, Bryan Brandt, Zach Hosale, Joe Rohde, Valerie Esser, Olivia Smith, Abel Mathew, Colleen McFarland, and Carley Richardson for their assistance on this project.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

David C. Houghton, Maddison R. Franklin, Michael P. Twohig, Martin E. Franklin, Scott N. Compton, Angela M. Neal-Barnett, Stephen M. Saunders and Douglas W. Woods declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Experiment Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1987). Some still-current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 313–327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, A. T. (1972). Measuring depression: the depression inventory. In T. A. Williams, M. M. Katz, & J. A. Shields (Eds.), Recent advances in the psychobiology of the depressive illnesses (pp. 299–302). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring anxiety: psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boudjouk, P., Woods, D., Miltenberger, R., & Long, E. (2008). Negative peer evaluation in adolescents: effects of tic disorders and trichotillomania. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 22(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casati, J., Toner, B., & Yu, B. (2000). Psychosocial issues for women with trichotillomania. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 41(5), 344–351.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. L. (2010). Enhancing the growth of natural eyelashes: the mechanism of Bimatoprost-induced eyelash growth. Dermatologic Surgery, 36, 1361–1371.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahlke, F., Lohaus, A., & Gutzman, H. (1992). Reliability and clinical concepts underlying global judgments in dementia: implications for clinical research. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 28(4), 425–432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Diefenbach, G. J., Tolin, D. F., Crocetto, J., Maltby, N., & Hannan, S. (2005). Assessment of trichotillomania: a psychometric evaluation of hair-pulling scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27(3), 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diefenbach, G. J., Tolin, D. F., Hannan, S., Maltby, N., & Crocetto, J. (2006). Group treatment for trichotillomania: behavior therapy versus supportive therapy. Behavior Therapy, 37(4), 353–363.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Franklin, M. E., & Tolin, D. F. (2007). Treating trichotillomania: cognitive-behavioral therapy for hairpulling and related problems. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friman, P. C., Finney, J. W., & Christopherson, E. R. (1984). Behavioral treatment of trichotillomania: an evaluative review. Behavior Therapy, 15(3), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frisch, M. B., Cornell, J., Villanueva, M., & Retzlaff, P. J. (1992). Clinical validation of the quality of life inventory: a measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grant, J. E., Odlaug, B. L., & Kim, S. W. (2009). N-acetylcysteine, a glutamate modulator, in the treatment of trichotillomania: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66(7), 756–763.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Guy, W. (1976). Clinical global impression scale. The ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology-Revised, 76(338), 218–222. Volume DHEW Publ No ADM.Google Scholar
  18. Haaga, D. A. F., Falkenstein, M. J., Banis, M., Malloy, E. J., McDonough, L., & Rogers, K. (2015). Reliability and validity of a photo rating measure of alopecia. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37(4), 673–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Helleström, Å., & Teckle, J. (1994). Person perception through facial photographs: effects of glasses, hair, and beard on judgments of occupation and personal qualities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(6), 693–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunter, M. (2007). The persistent problem of colorism: skin tone, status, and inequality. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaufman, K. D., Olsen, E. A., Whiting, D., Savin, R., DeVillez, R., Bergfeld, W., et al. (1998). Finasteride in the treatment of men with androgenetic alopecia. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 39(4), 578–589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Keuthen, N. J., O’Sullivan, R. L., Ricciardi, J. N., Shera, D., Savage, C. R., Borgmann, A. S., et al. (1995). The Massachusetts general hospital (MGH) hairpulling scale: 1. Development and factor analysis. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 64(3–4), 141–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Leon, A. C., Shear, M. K., Klerman, G. L., Portera, L., Rosenbaum, J. F., & Goldenberg, I. (1993). A comparison of symptom determinants of patient and clinician global ratings in patients with panic disorder and depression. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 13(5), 327–331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Long, E., Woods, D., Miltenberger, R., Fuqua, W., & Boudjouk, P. (1999). Examining the social effects of habit behaviors exhibited by individuals with mental retardation. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11(4), 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mansfield, E. R., & Helms, B. P. (1981). Detecting multicollinearity. The American Statistician, 36(3a), 158–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marcks, B., Woods, D., & Ridosko, J. (2005). The effects of trichotillomania disclosure on peer perceptions and social acceptability. Body Image, 2(3), 299–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McKelvie, S. J. (1993). Stereotyping in perception of attractiveness, age, and gender in schematic faces. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 21(2), 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Myers, R. J., & Hamilton, J. B. (1951). Regeneration and rate of growth of hairs in man. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 53(3), 562–568.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ninan, P. T., Rothbaum, B. O., Marstellar, F. A., Knight, B. T., & Eccard, M. B. (2000). A placebo-controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy and clomipramine in trichotillomania. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 61(1), 47–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Sullivan, R. L., Keuthen, N. J., Hayday, C. F., Ricciardi, J. N., Buttolph, M. L., Jenike, M. A., et al. (1995). The Massachusetts general hospital (MGH) hairpulling scale: 2. Reliability and validity. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 64(3–4), 146–148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ricketts, E., Brandt, B., & Woods, D. (2012). The effects of severity and causal explanation on social perception of hair loss. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 1(4), 336–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rothbaum, B. O., & Ninan, P. T. (1994). The assessment of trichotillomania. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(6), 651–662.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sadrô, J., Jarudi, I., & Sinhaô, P. (2003). The role of eyebrows in recognition. Perception, 32(3), 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schosser, R. H., & Kendrick, J. P. (1987). Dermatologic photography. Dermatologic Clinics, 5(2), 445–461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Slue, W. E. (1989). Photographic cures for dermatologic disorders. Archives of Dermatology, 125(7), 960–962.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Soriano, J., O’Sullivan, R., Baer, L., Phillips, K., McNally, R., & Jenike, M. (1996). Trichotillomania and self-esteem: a survey of 62 female hair pullers. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 57(2), 77–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sprinkle, S. D., Lurie, D., Insko, S. L., Atkinson, G., Jones, G. L., Logan, A. R., et al. (2002). Criterion validity, severity cut scores, and test-retest reliability of the beck depression inventory-II in a university counseling center sample. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(3), 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stemberger, R., Thomas, A., Mansueto, C., & Carter, J. (2000). Personal toll of trichotillomania: behavioral and interpersonal sequelae. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 14(1), 97–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Swedo, S. E., Leonard, H. L., Rapoport, J. L., Lenane, M. C., Goldberger, E. L., & Cheslow, D. L. (1989). A double-blind comparison of clomipramine and desipramine in the treatment of trichotillomania (hair pulling). New England Journal of Medicine, 321(8), 497–501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tolin, D. F., Franklin, M. E., Diefenbach, G. J., & Gross, A. (2002). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pediatric trichotilomania: an open trial. Paper presented at the association for advancement of behavior therapy. NV: Reno.Google Scholar
  43. Twohig, M. P., & Woods, D. W. (2004). A preliminary investigation of acceptance and commitment therapy and habit reversal as a treatment for trichotillomania. Behavior Therapy, 35(4), 803–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wetterneck, C. T., Woods, D. W., Norberg, M. M., & Begotka, A. M. (2006). The social and economic impact of trichotillomania: results from two nonreferred samples. Behavioral Interventions, 21(2), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth. New York: Anchor/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  46. Woods, D. W., Fuqua, W., & Outman, R. (1999). Evaluating the social acceptability of persons with habit disorders: the effects of topography, frequency, and gender manipulation. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Woods, D. W., Flessner, C. A., Franklin, M. E., Keuthen, N. J., Goodwin, R. D., Stein, D. J., et al. (2006). The trichotillomania impact project (TIP): exploring phenomenology, functional impact, and treatment utilization. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 67(12), 1877–1888.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • David C. Houghton
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maddison R. Franklin
    • 1
  • Michael P. Twohig
    • 2
  • Martin E. Franklin
    • 3
  • Scott N. Compton
    • 4
  • Angela M. Neal-Barnett
    • 5
  • Stephen M. Saunders
    • 6
  • Douglas W. Woods
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTexas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesDuke University School of MedicineDurhamUSA
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyKent State UniversityKentUSA
  6. 6.Department of PsychologyMarquette UniversityMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations