The Disruptive Adolescent as a Grown-Up: Predicting Adult Startle Responses to Violent and Erotic Films from Adolescent Conduct Problems and Callous-Unemotional Traits
- 425 Downloads
The current study aimed to identify heterogeneous groups of adolescents differing on their levels of conduct problems (CP) and callous-unemotional (CU) traits, and compare them on startle reactivity to emotional videos (violent/erotic) during young adulthood. A Latent Profile Analysis, conducted among a longitudinal sample of 2306 adolescents, provided evidence for the existence of heterogeneous CP and CU subgroups (i.e., CP-only, CU-only, and CP+CU groups). Three years later, 82 young adults (Mage = 19.95), randomly selected from the identified groups, participated in an experiment assessing their startle eye-blink responses during violent, erotic and neutral video scenes. Self-report ratings of fear, valence and arousal to affective scenes were also collected. Findings suggested that adolescents high on CP and low on CU traits showed high startle potentiation when viewing violent scenes during young adulthood, while those high on both CP and CU traits showed diminished startle reactivity to violent stimuli. Individuals high on CU traits without CP showed similar startle reactivity to controls. Further, the findings indicate that startle potentiation to violent stimuli can be a reliable physiological marker to distinguish antisocial individuals with and without CU traits. The finding that the CU only group was not differentiated from the control group on startle reactivity when viewing violent stimuli might explain their lower likelihood of engaging in antisocial behavior.
KeywordsCallous-unemotional traits Conduct problems Startle potentiation Fearlessness Violent movies
Conflict of Interest
Melina Nicole Kyranides, Kostas A. Fanti and Georgia Panayiotou declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Experiment participants provided written consent and were debriefed about the experimental procedure.
- American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Andershed, H., Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Levander, S. (2002). Psychopathic traits in nonreferred youths: A new assessment tool. In E. Blaauw & L. Sheridan (Eds.), Psychopaths: Current international perspectives (pp. 131–158). The Hague: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- de Wied, M., van Boxtel, A., Matthys, W., & Meeus, W. (2012). Verbal, facial and autonomic responses to empathy-eliciting film clips by disruptive male adolescents with high versus low callous-unemotional traits. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 211–223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Fanti, K. A., Panayiotou, G., Lazarou, C., Michael, R., & Georgiou, G. (2015b). The better of two evils? Evidence that children exhibiting continuous conduct problems high or low on callous-unemotional traits score on opposite directions on physiological and behavioral measures of fear. Development and Psychopathology.. doi: 10.1017/S0954579415000371.2015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fanti, K. A., Panayiotou, G., Lombardo, M. V., & Kyranides, M. N. (2015c). Unemotional on all counts: evidence of reduced affective responses in individuals with high callous-unemotional traits across emotion systems and valences. Social Neuroscience. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1034378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frick, P.J. (2004). Inventory of callous–unemotional traits. Unpublished rating scale. New Orleans, LA: University of New Orleans.Google Scholar
- Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2014). Annual research review: a developmental psychopathology approach to understanding callous‐unemotional traits in children and adolescents with serious conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 532–548.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gadow, K. D., & Sprafkin, J. (1999). Youth’s inventory 4 manual. Stony Brook: Checkmate Plus.Google Scholar
- Gadow, K. D., Sprafkin, J., & Weiss, M. (2004). Adult self-report inventory-4 manual. Stony Brook: Checkmate Plus.Google Scholar
- Gao, Y., & Raine, A. (2010). Successful and unsuccessful psychopaths: a neurobiological model. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 194–210.Google Scholar
- Kimonis, E. R., Fanti, K. A., Frick, P. J., Moffitt, T., Essau, C., Bijttebier, P., & Marsee, M. A. (2014a). Using self-reported callous-unemotional traits to cross-nationally assess the DSM-5 “With Limited Prosocial Emotions” specifier. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kimonis, E. R., Fanti, K. A., & Singh, J. P. (2014b). Establishing cut-off scores for the parent-reported inventory of callous-unemotional traits. Archives of Forensic Psychology, 1, 27–48.Google Scholar
- Marsh, A. A., Finger, E. C., Mitchell, D. G., Reid, M. E., Sims, C., Kosson, D. S., & Blair, R. J. R. (2008). Reduced amygdala response to fearful expressions in children and adolescents with callous-unemotional traits and disruptive behavior disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 712–720.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Panayiotou, G., Witvliet, C. V. O., Robinson, J. D., & Vrana, S. R. (2011). A startling absence of emotion effects: active attention to the startle probe as a motor task cue appears to eliminate modulation of the startle reflex by valence and arousal. Biological Psychology, 87, 226–233.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
- Viding, E., Sebastian, C. L., Dadds, M. R., Lockwood, P. L., Cecil, C. D., Brito, S. A., & McCrory, E. J. (2014). Amygdala response to preattentive masked fear in children with conduct problems: the role of callous-unemotional traits. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 1109–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar