Advertisement

A Further Evaluation of the Triarchic Conceptualization of Psychopathy in College Students

  • M. Brent Donnellan
  • S. Alexandra Burt
Article

Abstract

The current study provides additional information about the nomological networks of the personality dimensions associated with the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy – boldness, meanness, and disinhibition (Patrick et al. 2009). All analyses were based on a sample of college students (N = 633 to 637; 50 % women). We evaluated correlations between measures of the triarchic constructs and measures of the facets and domains of the Five-Factor Model (FFM). We also evaluated associations between triarchic constructs and measures of self-esteem, narcissism, aggression and antisocial behavior and tested whether the triarchic measures increment measures of the FFM for predicting these variables. We replicated and extended previous studies concerning the correlates of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition. We also found evidence that measures of the triarchic dimensions incremented measures of the FFM, especially when considering self-reported antisocial behavior.

Keywords

Antisocial behavior Five-factor model Triarchic model Personality assessment Psychopathy 

Notes

Conflict of Interest

M. Brent Donnellan, S. Alexandra Burt declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Experiment Participants

The research was deemed exempt by the Institutional Review Board of the university where the data were collected. All participants provided informed consent by clicking on the appropriate box in the online survey.

References

  1. Blagov, P. S., Patrick, C. J., Oost, K. M., Goodman, J. A., & Pugh, A. T. (2015). Triarchic psychopathy measure: Validity in relation to normal-range traits, personality pathology, and psychological adjustment. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2105_29_182.
  2. Brislin, S. J., Drislane, L. E., Smith, S. T., Edens, J. F., & Patrick, C. J. (2015). Development and validation of triarchic psychopathy scales from the multidimensional personality questionnaire. Psychological Assessment.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, R. P., Budzek, K., & Tamborski, M. (2009). On the meaning and measure of narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 951–964.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burt, S. A., & Donnellan, M. B. (2009). Development and validation of the Sub-types of antisocial behavior questionnaire (STAB). Aggressive Behavior, 35, 376–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity (5th ed., ). St. Louis:C. V. Mosby.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed., ). Hillsdale:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa:Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc..Google Scholar
  9. Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Robins, R. W. (2015). Measures of self-esteem. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 131–157). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Drislane, L. E., Patrick, C. J., & Arsal, G. (2014). Clarifying the content coverage of differing psychopathy inventories through reference to the triarchic psychopathy measure. Psychological Assessment, 26, 350–362.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Drislane, L. E., Brislin, S. J., Kendler, K. S., Andershed, H., Larsson, H., & Patrick, C. J. (2015). A triarchic model analysis of the youth psychopathic traits inventory. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 15–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fowles, D. C., & Dindo, L. (2009). Temperament and psychopathy: a dual-pathway model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: a 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Furr, R. M. (2010). The double-entry intraclass correlation as an index of profile similarity: meaning, limitations, and alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 1–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the five factor model with a 120-item public domain inventory: development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised (2nd ed., ). Multi-Health Systems:Toronto.Google Scholar
  17. Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunsley, J., & Meyer, G. J. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15, 446–455.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oakes:Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  21. Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 768–821.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Latzman, R. D., Drislane, L. E., Hecht, L. K., Brislin, S. J., Patrick, C. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., et al (2015). A chimpanzee (pan troglodytes) model of triarchic psychopathy constructs: development and initial validation. Clinical Psychological Science.Google Scholar
  23. Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 488–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lilienfeld, S. O., Patrick, C. J., Benning, S. D., Berg, J., Sellbom, M., & Edens, J. F. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: confusions, controversies, and clarifications. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lilienfeld, S. O., Watts, A. L., Smith, F. S., Berg, J. M., & Latzman, R. D. (2014). Psychopathy deconstructed and reconstructed: identifying and assembling the personality building blocks of cleckley's chimera. Journal of Personality.Google Scholar
  26. Marcus, D. K., Fulton, J. J., & Edens, J. F. (2013). The two-factor model of psychopathic personality: evidence from the psychopathic personality inventory. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maples, J. L., Guan, L., Carter, N. T., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A test of the international personality item pool representation of the revised NEO personality inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 26, 1070–1084.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Marion, B. E., Sellbom, M., Salekin, R. T., Toomey, J. A., Kucharski, L. T., & Duncan, S. (2013). An examination of the association between psychopathy and dissimulation using the MMPI-2-RF validity scales. Law and Human Behavior, 37, 219–230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2006). Reactive and proactive aggression: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1469–1480.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2012). An examination of the psychopathic personality inventory's nomological network: a meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 305–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: can the five factor model adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality, 69, 253–276.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ozer, D. J., & Reise, S. P. (1994). Personality assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 357–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patrick, C. J. (2010). Operationalizing the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Preliminary description of brief scales for assessment of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition. Unpublished manual, Department of Psychology. Tallahassee:Florida State University Retrieved from http://www. phenxtoolkit.org.Google Scholar
  34. Patrick, C. J., & Drislane, L. E. (2014). Triarchic model of psychopathy: origins, operationalizations, and observed linkages with personality and general psychopathology. Journal of Personality.Google Scholar
  35. Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Pincus, A. L., & Lukowitsky, M. R. (2010). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 421–446.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Poy, R., Segarra, P., Esteller, À., López, R., & Moltó, J. (2014). FFM description of the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy in men and women. Psychological Assessment, 26, 69–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Liu, J. (2006). The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159–171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton:Princeton University.Google Scholar
  40. Rosenthal, S. A., Hooley, J. M., & Steshenko, Y. (2007). Distinguishing grandiosity from self-esteem: Development of the Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  41. Sellbom, M., & Phillips, T. R. (2013). An examination of the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy in incarcerated and nonincarcerated samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 208–214.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Skeem, J. L., Polaschek, D. L., Patrick, C. J., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2011). Psychopathic personality bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 95–162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Stanley, J. H., Wygant, D. B., & Sellbom, M. (2013). Elaborating on the construct validity of the triarchic psychopathy measure in a criminal offender sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 343–350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Venables, N. C., Hall, J. R., & Patrick, C. J. (2014). Differentiating psychopathy from antisocial personality disorder: a triarchic model perspective. Psychological Medicine, 44, 1005–1013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wall, T. D., Wygant, D. B., & Sellbom, M. (2015). Boldness explains a key difference between psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22, 94–105).Google Scholar
  47. Witt, E. A., & Donnellan, M. B. (2008). Furthering the case for the MPQ-based measures of psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wood, A. M., Joseph, S., & Maltby, J. (2008). Gratitude uniquely predicts satisfaction with life: incremental validity above the domains and facets of the five factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(1), 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTexas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations