A Further Evaluation of the Triarchic Conceptualization of Psychopathy in College Students
- 532 Downloads
The current study provides additional information about the nomological networks of the personality dimensions associated with the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy – boldness, meanness, and disinhibition (Patrick et al. 2009). All analyses were based on a sample of college students (N = 633 to 637; 50 % women). We evaluated correlations between measures of the triarchic constructs and measures of the facets and domains of the Five-Factor Model (FFM). We also evaluated associations between triarchic constructs and measures of self-esteem, narcissism, aggression and antisocial behavior and tested whether the triarchic measures increment measures of the FFM for predicting these variables. We replicated and extended previous studies concerning the correlates of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition. We also found evidence that measures of the triarchic dimensions incremented measures of the FFM, especially when considering self-reported antisocial behavior.
KeywordsAntisocial behavior Five-factor model Triarchic model Personality assessment Psychopathy
Conflict of Interest
M. Brent Donnellan, S. Alexandra Burt declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The research was deemed exempt by the Institutional Review Board of the university where the data were collected. All participants provided informed consent by clicking on the appropriate box in the online survey.
- Blagov, P. S., Patrick, C. J., Oost, K. M., Goodman, J. A., & Pugh, A. T. (2015). Triarchic psychopathy measure: Validity in relation to normal-range traits, personality pathology, and psychological adjustment. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2105_29_182.
- Brislin, S. J., Drislane, L. E., Smith, S. T., Edens, J. F., & Patrick, C. J. (2015). Development and validation of triarchic psychopathy scales from the multidimensional personality questionnaire. Psychological Assessment.Google Scholar
- Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity (5th ed., ). St. Louis:C. V. Mosby.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed., ). Hillsdale:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa:Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc..Google Scholar
- Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Robins, R. W. (2015). Measures of self-esteem. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 131–157). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised (2nd ed., ). Multi-Health Systems:Toronto.Google Scholar
- Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oakes:Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Latzman, R. D., Drislane, L. E., Hecht, L. K., Brislin, S. J., Patrick, C. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., et al (2015). A chimpanzee (pan troglodytes) model of triarchic psychopathy constructs: development and initial validation. Clinical Psychological Science.Google Scholar
- Lilienfeld, S. O., Watts, A. L., Smith, F. S., Berg, J. M., & Latzman, R. D. (2014). Psychopathy deconstructed and reconstructed: identifying and assembling the personality building blocks of cleckley's chimera. Journal of Personality.Google Scholar
- Maples, J. L., Guan, L., Carter, N. T., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A test of the international personality item pool representation of the revised NEO personality inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 26, 1070–1084.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2006). Reactive and proactive aggression: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1469–1480.Google Scholar
- Patrick, C. J. (2010). Operationalizing the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Preliminary description of brief scales for assessment of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition. Unpublished manual, Department of Psychology. Tallahassee:Florida State University Retrieved from http://www. phenxtoolkit.org.Google Scholar
- Patrick, C. J., & Drislane, L. E. (2014). Triarchic model of psychopathy: origins, operationalizations, and observed linkages with personality and general psychopathology. Journal of Personality.Google Scholar
- Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Liu, J. (2006). The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159–171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton:Princeton University.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, S. A., Hooley, J. M., & Steshenko, Y. (2007). Distinguishing grandiosity from self-esteem: Development of the Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
- Wall, T. D., Wygant, D. B., & Sellbom, M. (2015). Boldness explains a key difference between psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22, 94–105).Google Scholar