Empathy Faking in Psychopathic Offenders: The Vulnerability of Empathy Measures

Article

Abstract

The incapacity of individuals to experience empathy has long been linked to heightened risks of antisocial acts being perpetrated without remorse. Psychologists frequently consider deficits in empathy in the context of risk assessments and other clinical appraisals, such as the amenability to treatment. When evaluated, offenders—especially those with substantial psychopathic traits—may be motivated to mask their empathic deficits to avoid being characterized as callous and cold-blooded toward the victims of their crimes. The current study is the first known investigation with an offender population to simulate empathy via positive impression management (PIM). Using a mixed between- and within-subjects design, 81 male detainees were categorized into a Low, Moderate, or High Psychopathy group, based on the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). For the within-subjects component, all offenders answered empathy questionnaires under genuine and PIM conditions. In the genuine condition, results indicate that offenders—irrespective of psychopathy—possessed cognitive empathy, but not affective empathy. In the PIM condition, offenders easily simulated high levels of empathy. Potential approaches to the assessment of simulated empathy in offender populations are explored, including a possible indicator for simulated affective empathy.

Keywords

Empathy Psychopathy Positive impression management Simulation Offenders 

References

  1. Ballenger, J. F., Caldwell-Andrews, A., & Baer, R. A. (2001). Effects of positive impression management on the NEO personality inventory-revised in a clinical population. Psychological Assessment, 13, 254–260. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175. doi:10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blair, J., Mitchell, D., & Blair, K. (2005). The psychopath: Emotion and the brain. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Blair, R. R., & Coles, M. (2000). Expression recognition and behavioural problems in early adolescence. Cognitive Development, 15(4), 421–434. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00039-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blasingame, G. D. (1998). Suggested clinical uses of polygraphy in community-based sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 37–45. doi:10.1177/107906329801000105.Google Scholar
  6. Book, A. S., Quinsey, V. L., & Langford, D. (2007). Psychopathy and the perception of affect and vulnerability. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(4), 531–544. doi:10.1177/0093854806293554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychmetrika, 16, 297–334. doi:10.1007/bf02310555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleckley, H. (1941). The mask of sanity. Louis: St Mosby.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, M. H. (1980). Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2006). A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 54–58. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Glass, S. J., & Newman, J. P. (2006). Recognition of facial affect in psychopathic offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(4), 815–820. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.115.4.815.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hare, R. D. (1991). The hare psychopathy checklist—revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  14. Hare, R. D. (2003). The hare psychopathy checklist—revised (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  15. Hemmerdinger, J. M., Stoddart, S. D., & Lilford, R. J. (2007). A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine. BMC Medical Education, 7(24), 1–8. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-7-24.Google Scholar
  16. Jensen, S. H., & Jewell, C. A. (1988). The sex offender experts. Prosecutor. Fall: 13–20.Google Scholar
  17. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(5), 441–476. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2003.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lanyon, R. I., & Carle, A. C. (2007). Internal and external validity of scores on the balanced inventory of desirable responding and the paulhus deception scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 859–876. doi:10.1177/0013164406299104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. R. (2005). Psychopathic personality inventory—revised: professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  21. Lykken, D. T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Lyon, D. R., Hart, S. D., & Webster, C. D. (2001). Violence and risk assessment. In R. A. Schuller & J. P. Ogloff (Eds.), Introduction to psychology and law: Canadian perspectives (pp. 314–350). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  23. Marshall, W. L., Marshall, L. E., & Serran, G. A. (2009). Empathy and offending behavior. In M. McMurran & R. Howard (Eds.), Personality, personality disorder and violence: An evidence based approach (pp. 229–244). Blackwell: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, P. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1988). The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 324–344. doi:10.1037/00332909.103.3.324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mullins-Nelson, J. L., Salekin, R. T., & Leistico, A. R. (2006). Psychopathy, empathy, and perspective-taking ability in a community sample: implications for the successful psychopathy concept. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5(2), 133–149. doi:10.1080/14999013.2006.10471238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paulhus, D. (1998). Paulhus deception scales (PDS): The balanced inventory of desirable responding—7: User’s manual. North Tanawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  27. Reniers, R. P., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., & Völlm, B. A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84–95. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.528484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rogers, R. (Ed.). (2008). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  29. Rogers, R., & Cruise, K. R. (1998). Assessment of malingering with simulation designs: threats to external validity. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 273–285. doi:10.1023/A:1025702405865.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Spinella, M. (2005). Prefrontal substrates of empathy: psychometric evidence in a community sample. Biological Psychology, 70(3), 175–181. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.01.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Stevens, D. D., Charman, T. T., & Blair, R. R. (2001). Recognition of emotion in facial expressions and vocal tones in children with psychopathic tendencies. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162(2), 201–211. doi:10.1080/00221320109597961.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Viaglione, G. D. & Barnett, M. A. (1999, June). Measuring a new dimension of empathy: The empathic anger scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  33. Woodworth, M., & Porter, S. (2002). In cold blood: characteristics of criminal homicides as a function of psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 436–445. doi:10.1037/0021-843x.111.3.436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations