Exploring Associations Between Psychopathic Personality and Components of Disinhibition vs. Constraint

  • Robert D. Latzman
  • Jatin G. Vaidya
  • Mariya V. Malikina
  • Joanna M. Berg
  • Scott O. Lilienfeld
Article

Abstract

Recent models of psychopathy implicate Disinhibition vs. Constraint (DvC) as one of the primary underpinnings of psychopathic traits, although little research has examined associations between specific DvC components and psychopathy facets. The present study aimed to fill this gap by examining associations between psychopathy facets, as operationalized by two widely used self-report psychopathy instruments, and lower-order components of DvC within a racially diverse sample of 1,160 undergraduates. Path analyses confirmed the broad dimension of DvC as representing a general diathesis to psychopathy, with second-order components conferring more specific risks for particular psychopathy traits regardless of the model of psychopathy employed. Further, findings suggest that associations do not vary by race. Results suggest both generality and specificity of DvC dimensions as they relate to psychopathic traits, as well as potential avenues for further investigation of the associations between psychopathy and DvC.

Keywords

Psychopathy Disinhibition Low perseverance Low premeditation Agreeableness 

References

  1. Benning, S. D., Patrick, C. J., Hicks, B. M., Blonigen, D. M., & Krueger, R. F. (2003). Factor structure of the psychopathic personality inventory: validity and implications for clinical assessment. Psychological Assessment, 15, 340–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benning, S. D., Patrick, C. J., Blonigen, D. M., Hicks, B. M., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). Estimating facets of psychopathy from normal personality traits: a step toward community epidemiological investigations. Assessment, 12, 3–18.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Brinkley, C. A., Schmitt, W. A., Smith, S. S., & Newman, J. P. (2001). Construct validation of a self-report psychopathy scale: does Levenson’s self-report psychopathy scale measure the same constructs as Hare’s psychopathy checklist–revised? Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1021–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cale, E., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2002). Sex differences in psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder: an integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 1179–1207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, L. A. (1993). Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2008). Temperament: An organizing paradigm for trait psychology. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervins (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 265–286). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cleckley, H. (1941). The mask of sanity. St Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
  8. Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., & Skeem, J. (2007). Understanding the structure of the psychopathy checklist-revised. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(suppl. 49), s39–s50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI-R professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1998). Six approaches to the explication of facet-level traits: examples from conscientiousness. European Journal of Personality, 12, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cyders, M. A., Smith, G. T., Spillane, N. S., Fischer, S., Annus, A. M., & Peterson, C. (2007). Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychological Assessment, 19, 107–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Decuyper, M., De Pauw, S., De Fruyt, F., De Bolle, M., & De Clercq, B. J. (2009). A meta-analysis of psychopathy-, antisocial PD- and FFM associations. European Journal of Personality, 23, 531–565. Google Scholar
  13. Derefinko, K. J., & Lynam, D. R. (2006). Convergence and divergence among self-report psychopathy measures: a personality-based approach. Journal of Personality Disorders, 20, 261–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eysenck, H. (1990). Biological dimensions of personality. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 244–276). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  15. Fowles, D. C., & Dindo, L. (2009). Temperament and psychopathy: a dual-pathway model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the revised psychopathy checklist. Toronto: Multi Health Systems.Google Scholar
  17. Hare, R. D. (2003). Manual for the revised psychopathy checklist (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi Health Systems.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, R. L., Neumann, C. S., & Vitacco, M. J. (2007). Impulsivity, anger, and psychopathy: the moderating effect of ethnicity. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(3), 289–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  20. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kosson, D. S., Smith, S. S., & Newman, J. P. (1990). Evaluating the construct validity of psychopathy in black and white male inmates: three preliminary studies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 250–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krueger, R. F. (2006). Perspectives on the conceptualization of psychopathy: Toward an integration. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 193–202). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Latzman, R. D., & Vaidya, J. G. (2013). Common and distinct associations between aggression and alcohol problems with trait disinhibition. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35, 186–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Latzman, R. D., Vaidya, J. G., Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2011). Components of disinhibition (vs. constraint) differentially predict aggression and alcohol use. European Journal of Personality, 25, 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in- a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal populations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 488–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lilienfeld, S. O., & Fowler, K. A. (2006). The self-report assessment of psychopathy: Promises, problems, and solutions. In C. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 107–132). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  28. Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. (2005). Psychopathic personality inventory—Revised professional manual. Odessa: PAR.Google Scholar
  29. Lilienfeld, S. O., Patrick, C. J., Benning, S. D., Berg, J., Sellbom, M., & Edens, J. F. (2012a). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: confusions, controversies, and clarifications. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lilienfeld, S. O., Waldman, I. D., Landfield, K., Watts, A. L., Rubenzer, S., & Faschingbauer, T. R. (2012b). Fearless dominance and the U.S. Presidency: implications of psychopathic personality traits for successful and unsuccessful political leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 489–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lykken, D. T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2012). Fearless dominance and psychopathy: a response to Lilienfeld et al. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marcus, D. K., Fulton, J. J., & Edens, J. F. (2013). The two-factor model of psychopathic personality: evidence from the psychopathic personality inventory. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2006). Information-theoretic latent distribution modeling: distinguishing discrete and continuous latent variable models. Psychological Methods, 3, 228–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller, J. D., Gaughan, E. T., & Pryor, L. R. (2008). The levenson self-report psychopathy scale: an examination of the personality traits and disorders associated with the LSRP factors. Assessment, 15, 450–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller, J. D., Watts, A., & Jones, S. E. (2011). Does psychopathy manifest divergent relations with components of its nomological network depending on gender? Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 564–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  39. Neumann, C. S., Malterer, M. B., & Newman, J. P. (2008). Factor structure of the psychopathic personality inventory (PPI): findings from a large incarcerated sample. Psychological Assessment, 20, 169–174.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Poy, R., Segarra, P., Esteller, A., Lopez, R., & Molto, J. (2014). FFM description of the Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy in men and women. Psychological Assessment, 26, 69–76.Google Scholar
  42. Poythress, N. G., & Hall, J. R. (2011). Psychopathy and impulsivity reconsidered. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 120–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raine, A., & Venables, P. H. (1981). Classical conditioning and socialization—a biosocial interaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 2(4), 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Raine, A., Reynolds, C., Venables, P. H., & Mednick, S. A. (1997). Biosocial bases of aggressive behavior in childhood: Resting heart rate, skin conductance orienting and physique. In A. Raine, P. A. Brennan, D. P. Farrington, & S. A. Mednick (Eds.), Biosocial bases of violence (pp. 107–126). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ray, J. V., Poythress, N. G., Weir, J. M., & Rickelm, A. (2009). Relationships between psychopathy and impulsivity in the domain of self-reported personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roberts, B. W., Bogg, T., Walton, K. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Stark, S. E. (2004). A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: an empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58, 103–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Royle, J. A., & Dorazio, R. M. (2008). Hierarchical modeling and inference in ecology: The analysis of data from populations, metapopulations and communities. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Raudenbush, S. (2005). Social anatomy of racial and ethnic disparities in violence. American Journal of Public Health, 95(2), 224–232.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Seibert, A. L., Miller, J. D., Few, L. R., Zeichner, A., & Lynam, D. R. (2011). An examination of the structure of self-report psychopathy measures and their relations with general traits and externalizing behaviors. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sellbom, M., & Phillips, T. R. (2013). An examination of the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy in incarcerated and nonincarcerated samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 208–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Skeem, J., Polaschek, D., Patrick, C. J., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2011). Psychopathic personality: bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 95–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sullivan, E. A., & Kosson, D. S. (2006). Ethnic and cultural variations in psychopathy. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 437–458). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  54. Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681–706). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. (2008). Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the multidimensional personality questionnaire. In G. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Volume 2—Personality measurement and testing (pp. 261–293). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  56. Thornquist, M. H., & Zuckerman, M. (1995). Psychopathy, passive-avoidance learning and basic dimensions of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vachon, D. D., Lynam, D. R., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2012). Generalizing the nomological network of psychopathy across populations differing on race and conviction status. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(1), 263–269.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Vaidya, J. G., Latzman, R. D., Markon, K. E., & Watson, D. (2010). Age differences on measures of Disinhibition during young adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 815–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Watson, D., & Hubbard, B. (1996). Adaptational style and dispositional structure: coping in the context of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 64, 737–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Harkness, A. (1994). Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 18–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whelan, R., et al. (2012). Adolescent impulsivity phenotypes characterized by distinct brain networks. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 920–925.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The five factor model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert D. Latzman
    • 1
  • Jatin G. Vaidya
    • 2
  • Mariya V. Malikina
    • 1
  • Joanna M. Berg
    • 3
  • Scott O. Lilienfeld
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsIowa CityUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations