Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Dutch Version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device
- 347 Downloads
- 6 Citations
Abstract
The goal of the present study was to evaluate the factor structure and construct validity of the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) in a community sample of Dutch adolescents. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the two- and three-factor model, but the two-factor model (Callous-Unemotional and Impulsivity/Conduct Problems) was more parsimonious. Model fit was invariant across gender. Interrater reliability was good and internal consistency of the factors was modest to good, with the exception of the Callous-Unemotional factor. Convergence with the APSD self-report version, divergence with the Big Five personality dimensions of Agreeableness and Conscientiousness, and expected gender differences in mean APSD scores reproduced findings obtained in American samples, supporting the cross-cultural validity of the APSD.
Keywords
Callous-unemotional traits Psychopathy APSD Cross-cultural validityReferences
- Andershed, H., Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Levander, S. (2002). Psychopathic traits in non-referred youths: initial test of a new assessment tool. In E. Blaauw & L. Sheridan (Eds.), Psychopaths: Current international perspectives (pp. 131–158). The Hague: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Bijttebier, P., & Decoene, S. (2009). Assessment of psychopathic traits in children and adolescents: further validation of the Antisocial Process Screening Device and the Childhood Psychopathy Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blair, R. J. R. (2008). Fine cuts of empathy and the amygdala: dissociable deficits in psychopathy and autism. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 157–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blonigen, D. M., Patrick, C. J., Douglas, K. S., Poythress, N. G., Skeem, J. L., Lilienfeld, S. O., et al. (2010). Multimethod assessment of psychopathy in relation to factors of internalizing and externalizing from the personality assessment inventory: the impact of method variance and suppressor effects. Psychological Assessment, 22, 96–107.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Branje, S. J. T., van Lieshout, C. F. M., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2004). Relations between Big Five personality characteristics and perceived support in adolescents’ families. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 615–628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brinkley, C. A., Newman, J. P., Widiger, T. A., & Lynam, D. R. (2004). Two approaches to parsing the heterogeneity of psychopathy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 69–94.Google Scholar
- Burke, J. D., Loeber, R., & Lahey, B. B. (2007). Adolescent conduct disorder and interpersonal callousness as predictors of psychopathy in young adults. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 334–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cale, E. M., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2002). Sex differences in psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder: a review and integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 1179–1207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Christian, R. E., Frick, P. J., Hill, N. L., Tyler, L., & Frazer, D. R. (1997). Psychopathy and conduct problems in children: II. Implications for subtyping children with conduct problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 233–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13, 171–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1990). Personality disorders and the Five-Factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Disorders, 4, 362–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Czar, K. A., Dahlen, E. R., Bullock, E. E., & Nicholson, B. C. (2011). Psychopathic personality traits in relational aggression among young adults. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 207–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dadds, M. R., Hawes, D. J., Frost, A. D. J., Vassallo, S., Bunn, P., Hunter, K., et al. (2009). Learning to ‘talk the talk’: the relationship of psychopathic traits to deficits in empathy across childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 599–606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Das, J., De Ruiter, C., Van Heteren, M., & Doreleijers, T. (2004). Psychopathie bij kinderen en jeugdigen: Stand van zaken en diagnostische instrumenten [Psychopathy in children and youths: current status and diagnostic instruments.]. Tijdschrift voor Orthopedagogiek, Kinderpsychiatrie en Klinische Kinderpsychologie, 29, 30–42.Google Scholar
- Decuyper, M., de Pauw, S., de Fruyt, F., de Bolle, M., & de Clercq, B. J. (2009). A meta-analysis of psychopathy-, antisocial PD- and FFM associations. European Journal of Personality, 23, 531–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dillard, C. L., Salekin, R. T., Barker, E. D., & Grimes, R. D. (2013). Psychopathy in adolescent offenders: an item response theory study of the Antisocial Process Screening Device-self report and the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falkenbach, D. M., Poythress, N., & Heide, K. M. (2003). Psychopathic features in a juvenile diversion population: reliability and predictive validity of two self-report measures. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 787–805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fite, P. J., Greening, L., Stoppelbein, L., & Fabiano, G. A. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Antisocial Process Screening Device with a clinical inpatient population. Assessment, 16, 103–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Forth, A. E., Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1990). Assessment of psychopathy in male young offenders. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 342–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Forth, A. E., Kosson, D. S., & Hare. (2003). The psychopathy checklist: Youth version. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
- Frick, P. J., & Hare, R. D. (2001). The antisocial process screening device: Technical manual. North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
- Frick, P. J., O’Brien, B. S., Wootton, J. M., & McBurnett, K. (1994). Psychopathy and conduct problems in children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 700–707.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frick, P. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Ellis, M., Loney, B., & Silverthorn, P. (1999). The association between anxiety and psychopathy dimensions in children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 383–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frick, P. J., Bodin, S. D., & Barry, C. T. (2000). Psychopathic traits and conduct problems in community and clinic-referred samples of children: further development of the Psychopathy Screening Device. Psychological Assessment, 12, 382–393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frick, P. J., Cornell, A. H., Barry, C. T., Bodin, S. D., & Dane, H. E. (2003). Callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems in the prediction of conduct problem severity, aggression, and self-report of delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 457–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frick, P. J., Stickle, T. R., Dandreaux, D. M., Farrell, J. M., & Kimonis, E. R. (2005). Callous–unemotional traits in predicting the severity and stability of conduct problems and delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 471–487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2013, June 24). Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. Psychological Bulletin. doi: 10.1037/a0033076. Advance online publication.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fritz, M. V., Ruchkin, V., Koposov, R., & af Klintenberg, B. (2008). Antisocial Process Screening Device: validation on a Russian sample of juvenile delinquents with the emphasis on the role of personality and parental rearing. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31, 438–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grigorenko, E. L., Geiser, C., Slobodskaya, H. R., & Francis, D. J. (2010). Cross-informant symptoms from CBCL, TRF, and YSR: trait and method variance in a normative sample of Russian youths. Psychological Assessment, 22, 893–911.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the Hare psychopathy checklist-revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
- Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare PCL-R (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
- Harpur, T. J., Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1994). Personality of the psychopath. In P. T. Costa & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor model of personality (pp. 149–174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hicks, B. M., & Patrick, C. J. (2006). Psychopathy and negative emotionality: analyses of suppressor effects reveal distinct relations with emotional distress, fearfulness, and anger-hostility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 276–287.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hillige, S., Das, J., & de Ruiter, D. (2010). The youth psychopathic traits inventory: psychometric properties and its relation to substance use and interpersonal style in a Dutch sample of non-referred adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kotler, J. S., & McMahon, R. J. (2010). Assessment of child and adolescent psychopathy. In R. T. Salekin & D. R. Lynam (Eds.), Handbook of child & adolescent psychopathy (pp. 79–109). New York London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Loney, B. R., Frick, P. J., Clements, C. B., Ellis, M. L., & Kerlin, K. (2003). Callous-unemotional traits, impulsivity, and emotional processing in adolescents with antisocial behavior problems. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 66–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lynam, D. R. (1997). Pursuing the psychopath: capturin the fledging psychopath in a nomological net. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 209–234.Google Scholar
- Lynam, D. R. (2002). Fledgling psychopathy: a view from personality theory. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 255–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the Five-Factor Model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: an expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 401–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lynam, D. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Raine, A., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2005). Adolescent psychopathy and the Big Five: results from two samples. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 431–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marsee, M. A., Silverthorn, P. S., & Frick, P. J. (2005). The association of psychopathic traits with aggression and delinquency in non-referred boys and girls. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 803–817.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McMahon, R. J., Witkiewitz, K., & Kotler, J. S. (2010). Predictive validity of callous-unemotional traits measured in early adolescence with respect to multiple antisocial outcomes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 752–763.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: can the Five-Factor Model adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality, 69, 253–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muñoz, L. C., & Frick, P. J. (2007). The reliability, stability, and predictive utility of the self-report version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 299–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murrie, D. C., & Cornell, D. G. (2002). Psychopathy screening of incarcerated juveniles: a comparison of measures. Psychological Assessment, 14, 390–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, B. (2002). Using Mplus Monte Carlo Simulations in Practice: A Note on Assessing Estimation Quality and Power in Latent Variable Models. Mplus Web Notes: No. 1. www.statmodel.com.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Muthén, B., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Conditionally accepted for publication in Psychometrika.Google Scholar
- Neumann, C. S., Kosson, D. S., Forth, A. E., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Factor structure of the Hare psychopathy checklist: Youth Version (PCL:YV) in incarcerated adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 18, 142–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O’Kearney, R., & Dadds, M. (2010). Developmental and gender differences in the language for emotions across the adolescent years. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 913–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pardini, D. A., Lochman, J. E., & Frick, P. J. (2003). Callous/unemotional traits and social-cognitive processes in adjudicated youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 364–371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Petrila, J., & Skeem, J. L. (2003). An introduction to the special issues on juvenile psychopathy and some reflections on the current debate. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 689–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Poythress, N. G., Dembo, R., Wareham, J., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2006). Construct validity of the Youth Psychopathic traits Inventory (YPI) and the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) with justice-involved adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 26–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roose, A., Bijttebier, P., Claes, L., Lilienfeld, S. O., de Fruyt, F., & Decuypers, M. (2012). Psychopathic traits in adolescence and the Five Factor model of psychopathy. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34, 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salekin, R. T., Neumann, C. S., Leistico, A.-M. R., DiCicco, T. M., & Duros, R. L. (2004). Psychopathy and comorbidity in a young offender sample: taking a closer look at psychopathy’s potential importance over disruptive behaviour disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 416–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salekin, R. T., Leistico, A.-M. R., Trobst, K. K., Schrum, C. L., & Lochman, J. E. (2005). Adolescent psychopathy and personality theory—the interpersonal circumplex: expanding evidence of a nomological net. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 445–460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salekin, R. T., Debus, S. A., & Barker. (2010). Adolescent psychopathy and the Five Factor model: domain and facet analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 501–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Doorn, M. D., Branje, S. J. T., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2011). Developmental changes in conflict resolution styles in parent-adolescent relationships: a four wave longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 97–107.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vaughn, M. G., & Howard, M. O. (2005). Self-report measures of juvenile psychopathic traits: a comparative review. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 152–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vaughn, M. G., Howard, M. O., & DeLisi, M. (2008). Psychopathic personality traits and delinquent careers: an empirical examination. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31, 407–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Viding, E., Blair, R. J. R., Moffitt, T. E., & Plomin, R. (2005). Evidence for substantial genetic risk for psychopathy in 7-year-olds. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 592–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar