Connecting DSM-5 Personality Traits and Pathological Beliefs: Toward a Unifying Model
- First Online:
- 637 Downloads
Dissatisfaction with the DSM-IV model of personality disorders has led to the development of alternative conceptualizations, including pathological trait models and models linked to particular theoretical approaches, such as Beck and Freeman’s (1990) cognitive framework. An important issue involves the potential to interweave such models into a single, parsimonious system that combines their distinct advantages. In this study, pathological trait and dysfunctional belief data from 616 individuals in a non-clinical sample were evaluated for commensurability using structural equation modeling. These models can be integrated via five higher-order factors, and that specific dimensions of dysfunctional beliefs can be differentiated based on features of the DSM-5 trait model. Overall, these results suggest that traits provide scaffolding for individual differences in pathological personality, within which dysfunctional beliefs offer specific vectors for clinical intervention in a cognitive framework. Implications of the empirical commensurability of trait and cognitive models are discussed.
KeywordsPersonality disorders Traits Schema Dysfunctional beliefs DSM-5
- Beck, A. T., & Beck, J. S. (1991). The Personality Belief Questionnaire. Bala Cynwid: The Beck Institute for Cognitive Therapy and Research.Google Scholar
- Beck, A. T., & Freeman, A. (1990). Cognitive Therapy of Personality Disorders. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Benjamin, L. S. (1996). Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Fournier, J.C., DeRubeis, R.J., & Beck, A.T. (2012). Dysfunctional cognitions in personality pathology: The structure and validity of the Personality Beliefs Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 42, 795–805.Google Scholar
- Hopwood, C. J., Donnellan, M. B., Blonigen, D. M., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., Iacono, W. G., & Burt, S. A. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on personality trait stability and growth during the transition to adulthood: a three wave longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 545–556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ingram, R. E., & Hollon, S. D. (1986). Cognitive therapy of depression from an information processing perspective. In R. E. Ingram (Ed.), Information processing approaches to clinical psychology. Orlando: Academic.Google Scholar
- Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe personality disorders: Psychotherapeutic strategies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Markon, K.E. (2012). The development of an informant-report form of the PID-5: Rationale and initial results. Paper presented at the Society for Personality Assessment, Chicago IL.Google Scholar
- Thomas, K.M., Yalch, M.M., Krueger, R.F., Wright, A.G.C., Markon, K.E., & Hopwood, C.J. (2012). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait faces and Five Factor Model trait domains. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191112457589.
- Wright, A.G.C., Pincus, A.L., & Lenzenweger, M.F. (2012b). A parallel process growth model of avoidant personality disorder symptoms and personality traits. Personality Disorder: Theory, Research, and Treatment. doi:10.1037/a0027773.
- Wright, A.G.C., Thomas, K.M., Hopwood, C.J., Markon, K.E., Pincus, A.L., & Krueger, R.F. (2012c). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0027669.