Testing Factorial Structure and Validity of the PCL:SV in Lithuanian Prison Population

  • Rita Žukauskienė
  • Alfredas Laurinavičius
  • Ilona Čėsnienė
Article

Abstract

This study examined the factorial structure and validity of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV) in a European forensic context. A random sample of 257 criminal offenders from the Lithuanian prison population were administered the PCL:SV (Hart et al. 1995). The pattern of validity coefficients in this sample was comparable to other North American and non-North American samples. Several theoretical factorial structures for the PCL:SV were tested and compared. The two-factor model was not supported, while three- and four-factor models provided an acceptable fit to Lithuanian data. The four-factor model showed significantly better fit compared to the two-factor model. Correlations between PCL:SV factors and demographic variables confirm construct validity. However in the four-factor model, when controlling for correlations of the remaining three factors, only the Antisocial factor significantly correlated with variables related to criminal activity. It was concluded that the overall results of the PCL:SV in a male sample of Lithuanian offenders support cross-cultural generalizability of the construct of psychopathy as measured by the PCL:SV.

Keywords

Assessment Validation Psychopathy PCL:SV 

References

  1. Andrade, J. T. (2008). The inclusion of antisocial behavior in the construct of psychopathy: a review of the research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 328–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackburn, R. (2007). Personality disorder and psychopathy: conceptual and empirical integration. Psychology, Crime and Law, 13(1), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolt, D. M., Hare, R. D., Vitale, J. E., & Newman, J. P. (2004). A multigroup item response theory analysis of the psychopathy checklist-revised. Psychological Assessment, 16, 155–168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (1999). Psychopathy across cultures: North America and Scotland compared. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13, 171–188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooke, D. J., Kosson, D. S., & Michie, C. (2001). Psychopathy and ethnicity: structural, item, and test generalizability of the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL-R) in Caucasian and African American participants. Psychological Assessment, 13, 531–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Clark, D. A. (2004). Reconstructing psychopathy: clarifying the significance of antisocial behavior in the diagnosis of psychopathic personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 337–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., & Skeem, J. (2007). Understanding the structure of the psychopathy checklist-revised. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornell, D., Warren, J., Hawk, G., Stafford, E., Oram, G., & Pine, D. (1996). Psychopathy in instrumental and reactive violent offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 783–790.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Douglas, K., Strand, S., Belfrage, H., Fransson, G., & Levander, S. (2005). Reliability and validity evaluation of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV) in Swedish correctional and forensic psychiatric samples. Assessment, 12(2), 145–161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Doyle, M., Dolan, M., & McGovern, J. (2002). The validity of North American risk assessment tools in predicting in-patient violent behaviour in England. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 7, 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fabian, J. M. (2008). Current standards and practices in violence risk assessment at a maximum security forensic hospital following a high profile sexual homicide. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flores-Mendoza, C. E., Alvarenga, M. A. S., Herrero, O., & Abad, F. J. (2008). Factor structure and behavioural correlates of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised [PCL-R] in a Brazilian prisoner sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 584–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guy, L. S., & Douglas, K. S. (2006). Examining the utility of the PCL:SV as a screening measure using competing factor models of psychopathy. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 225–230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  16. Hare, R. D. (1998). The Hare PCL-R: some issues concerning its use and misuse. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 99–119.Google Scholar
  17. Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare psychopathy checklist-revised (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  18. Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hare, R. D., Clark, D., Grann, M., & Thornton, D. (2000). Psychopathy and the predictive validity of the PCL-R: an international perspective. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18(5), 623–645.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hart, S. D. (1998). The role of psychopathy in assessing risk for violence: conceptual and methodological issues. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 121–137.Google Scholar
  21. Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Performance of male psychopaths following conditional release from prison. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 227–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hart, S. D., Cox, D. N., & Hare, R. D. (1995). Manual for the psychopathy checklist: Screening version. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  23. Hemphill, J. F. (2007). The Hare psychopathy checklist and recidivism: Methodological issues and critical evaluation of empirical evidence. In H. Hervé & J. Yuille (Eds.), The psychopath: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 141–170). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Hobson, J., Shine, J., & Roberts, R. (2000). How do psychopaths behave in a prison therapeutic community? Psychology, Crime, and Law, 6, 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for the fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huchzermeier, C., Bruß, E., Geiger, F., Godt, N., von Nettelbladt, F., & Aldenhoff, J. (2006). Psychopathy checklist score predicts negative events during the sentences of prisoners with Hare psychopathy: a prospective study at a German prison. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 51, 692–697.Google Scholar
  27. Jackson, R. L., Neumann, C. S., & Vitacco, M. J. (2007). Impulsivity, anger, and psychopathy: the moderating effect of ethnicity. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(3), 289–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kosson, D. S., Smith, S. S., & Newman, J. P. (1990). Evaluating the construct validity of psychopathy in black and white male inmates: three preliminary studies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 250–259.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Leistico, A. R., Salekin, R. T., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the Hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 28–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
  31. Neumann, C. S., Vitacco, M. J., Hare, R. D., & Wupperman, P. (2005). Reconstruing the “Reconstruction” of psychopathy: a comment on Cooke, Michie, Hart, & Clark. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 624–640.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Neumann, C. S., Kosson, D., & Salekin, R. T. (2007). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the psychopathy construct: Methodological and conceptual issues. In H. Herve & J. Yuille (Eds.), The psychopath: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 79–104). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Nicholls, T. L., & Petrila, J. (2005). Gender and psychopathy: an overview of important issues and introduction to the special issue. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 729–741.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Richards, H. J., Casey, J. O., & Lucente, S. W. (2003). Psychopathy and treatment response in incarcerated female substance abusers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(2), 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roberts, A. D. L., & Coid, J. W. (2007). Psychopathy and offending behaviour: findings from the national survey of prisoners in England and Wales. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 18(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rogers, R. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 595–605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rogers, R., Salekin, R. T., Hill, C., Sewell, K. W., Murdock, M. E., & Newman, C. S. (2000). The psychopathy checklist-screening version: an examination of criteria and subcriteria in three forensic samples. Assessment, 7(1), 1–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Salekin, R. T., Brannen, D. N., Zalot, A. A., Leistico, A.-M., & Neumann, C. S. (2006). Factor structure of psychopathy in youth: testing the applicability of the new four-factor model. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(2), 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Serin, R. C., Peters, R., & Barbaree, H. E. (1990). The prediction of psychopathy and release outcome in a criminal population. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 419–422.Google Scholar
  40. Skeem, J. L., Edens, J. F., Camp, J., & Colwell, L. H. (2004). Are there ethnic differences in levels of psychopathy? A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 505–527.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Strand, S., & Belfrage, H. (2005). Gender differences in psychopathy in a Swedish offender sample. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 837–850.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sullivan, E. A., & Kosson, D. S. (2006). Ethnic and cultural variations in psychopathy. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 437–458). NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  43. Toupin, J., Basque, C., Côté, G., & Deshaies, C. (2008). Adaptation de la PCL-SV à l’évaluation des adolescents suivis en Centre jeunesse: une étude préliminaire. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 50(1), 83–110.Google Scholar
  44. Vitacco, M. J., Neumann, C. S., & Jackson, R. (2005). Development of a four-factor model of psychopathy: associations with ethnicity, gender, violence, and intelligence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 466–476.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Walters, G. D., Gray, N. S., Jackson, R. L., Sewell, K. W., Rogers, R., Taylor, J., et al. (2007). A taxometric analysis of the psychopathy checklist: screening version (PCL:SV): further evidence of dimensionality. Psychological Assessment, 19, 330–339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Walters, G. D., Knight, R. A., Grann, M., & Dahle, K.-P. (2008). Incremental validity of the psychopathy checklist facet scores: predicting release outcome in six samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117(2), 369–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wogan, M., & MacKenzie, M. (2007). An inmate classification system based on PCL:SV factor scores in a sample of prison inmates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 44(4), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rita Žukauskienė
    • 1
  • Alfredas Laurinavičius
    • 1
  • Ilona Čėsnienė
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMykolas Romeris UniversityVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations