Psychopathy and APD in Non-forensic Patients: Improved Predictions or Disparities in Cut Scores?

Article

Abstract

Psychopathy has traditionally been viewed as a distinct syndrome that is superior to Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD) for the prediction of violent and aggressive behavior. However, direct comparisons of psychopathy and APD are infrequent and mostly occur in correctional populations. Moreover, any observed differences could simply reflect a disparity in cut scores. The constellation of Psychopathy Checklists (PCL-R, PCL:SV, and PCL:YV) set the minimum cut score at 75% (e.g., ≥30 of 40 for the PCL-R), which is far more stringent than what is required for the DSM-IV APD adult criteria (i.e., ≥ 3 of 7 or 42.9%). For use in a non-forensic setting, we re-examined the MacArthur Risk Assessment data set to evaluate the usefulness of the PCL:SV and APD for short-term predictions of violent and aggressive acts. Using the ≥75% cut score to predict violence produced low sensitivities for both the psychopathy (.18) and APD adult criteria (.14) but very high specificities (.94). Reducing the cut score to approximately 40% greatly improved sensitivity rates (.62 for psychopathy and .85 for Adult APD criteria) at the expense of specificity (.59 and .40 respectively). In making multiple comparisons, psychopathy did not appear superior to APD adult criteria in predicting violent or other aggressive behavior. Instead, both constructs had limited predictive power with patients in a non-forensic setting. On an item level, specific indicators of violent behavior were explored.

Keywords

Psychopathy Antisocial personality disorder Risk assessment Violence MacArthur Risk Assessment 

References

  1. Association American Psychiatric. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education [AERA/APA/NCME]. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: Author.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington: Author.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.; Text Revision). Washington: Author.Google Scholar
  5. Bovasso, G. B., Alterman, A. I., Cacciola, J. S., & Rutherford, M. J. (2002). The prediction of violent and nonviolent criminal behavior in a methadone maintenance population. Journal of Personality Disorders, 16, 360–373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Silva, K., Duggan, C., & McCarthy, L. (2004). Does treatment really make psychopaths worse? A review of the evidence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 163–177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Edens, J. F., Marcus, D. K., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Poythress, N. G. (2006). Psychopathic, not psychopath: taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 131–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Edens, J. F., Campbell, J. S., & Weir, J. M. (2007). Youth psychopathy and criminal recidivism: a meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist measures. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 53–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Forth, A. E., Kosson, D. S., & Hare, R. D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth version. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  10. Fulero, S. M. (1995). Review of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-revised. In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 453–454). Lincoln: Buros Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the “unparalleled” measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 397–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  13. Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy: a clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hare, R. D. (2003). Technical manual for the revised Psychopathy Checklist (2nd ed.). North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  15. Hare, R.D., Cox, D.N., & Hart, S.D. (1989). Preliminary manual for the Psychopathy Checklist: Clinical version (PCL:CV). Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  16. Hart, S. D. & Hare, R. D. (1989). Discriminant validity of the Psychopathy Checklist in a forensic psychiatric population. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hart, S. D., Cox, D. N., & Hare, R. D. (1995). Manual for the screening version of the Psychopathy Checklist revised (PCL:SV). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  18. Hemphill, J. F., Hare, R. D., & Wong, S. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: a review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 139–170.Google Scholar
  19. Leistico, A. R., Salekin, R. T., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the Hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 28–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Marcus, D. K., Lilienfeld, S. O., Edens, J. F., & Poythress, N. G. (2006). Is antisocial personality disorder continuous or categorical? A taxometric analysis. Psychological Medicine, 36, 1571–1581.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Megargee, E. I. (1976). The prediction of dangerous behavior. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 3, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., et al. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  23. Murrie, D. C., Marcus, D. K., Douglas, K. S., Lee, Z., Salekin, R. T., & Vincent, G. (2007). Youth with psychopathy features are not a discrete class: a taxometric analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 714–723.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pfohl, B., Blum, N., Zimmerman, M., & Stangl, D. (1989). The structured interview for DSM-III personality disorders: SIDP-R. Iowa: University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  25. Policy Research Associates. (2001). The MacArthur risk assessment study: coding manual. Online document accessed on April 7, 2008 from http://macarthur.virginia.edu/download.htm.
  26. Ogloff, J. R. P. (2006). Psychopathy/antisocial personality disorder conundrum. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 519–528.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rogers, R. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 595–605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rogers, R. (2001). Handbook of diagnostic and structured interviewing. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  29. Rogers, R., Jordan, M. J., & Harrison, K. S. (2007). Facets of psychopathy, axis II traits, and behavioral dysregulation among jail detainees. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 471–483.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rogstad, J. E. & Rogers, R. (2008). Gender differences in contributions of emotion to psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1472–1484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Salekin, R. T. (2002). Psychopathy and therapeutic pessimism: clinical lore or clinical reality? Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 79–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Salekin, R. T. (2008). Psychopathy and recidivism from mid-adolescence to young adulthood: cumulating legal problems and limiting life opportunities. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 386–395.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., & Sewell, K. W. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist-revised: predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Silver, E., Mulvey, E. P., & Monahan, J. (1999). Assessing violence risk among discharged psychiatric patients: toward an ecological approach. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 237–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Skeem, J. L. & Mulvey, E. P. (2001). Psychopathy and community violence among civil psychiatric patients: results from the MacArthur violence risk assessment study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 358–374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Skilling, T. A., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (2002). Identifying persistently antisocial offenders using the Hare Psychopathy Checklist and DSM antisocial personality disorder criteria. Psychological Assessment, 14, 27–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Steadman, H. J., Mulvey, E. P., Monahan, J., Robbins, P. C., Appelbaum, P. S., Grisso, T., et al. (1998). Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 393–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Steadman, H., Silver, E., Monahan, J., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., et al. (2000). A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 83–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Vitacco, M. J., Salekin, R. T., & Rogers, R. (2009). Forensic issues. Invited chapter submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  40. Walters, G. D. (2003). Predicting institutional adjustment and recidivism with the Psychopathy Checklist factor scores: a meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 541–558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Walters, G. D. (2006). Risk-appraisal versus self-report in the prediction of criminal justice outcomes: a meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Walters, G. D., Gray, N. S., Jackson, R. L., Sewell, K. W., Rogers, R., Taylor, J., et al. (2007). A taxometric analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist: screening version (PCL:SV): further evidence of dimensionality. Psychological Assessment, 19, 330–339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Widiger, T. A., Cadoret, R., Hare, R., Robins, L., Rutherford, M., Zanarini, M., et al. (1996). DSM-IV antisocial personality disorder field trial. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 3–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wollert, R. (2006). Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarials are used to identify sexually violent predators: an application of Bayes’s theorem. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 56–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wormith, J., Olver, M., Stevenson, H., & Girard, L. (2007). The long-term prediction of offender recidivism using diagnostic, personality, and risk/need approaches to offender assessment. Psychological Services, 4, 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations