The Expanded Version of the Inferential Confusion Questionnaire: Further Development and Validation in Clinical and Non-Clinical Samples
- 296 Downloads
The current study represents the further development and validation of an expanded version of the Inferential Confusion Questionnaire (ICQ-EV) in non-clinical and clinical samples. Inferential confusion seems to be particularly relevant to Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) and is defined as a failure to recognize the unrealistic nature of obsessions due to a subjective form of reasoning. Factor analysis of the item-set of the ICQ-EV indicated a one-dimensional solution in non-clinical and clinical samples. It was hypothesized that inferential confusion as measured by the ICQ-EV would be particularly relevant to participants with OCD. Results confirmed convergent validity with strong relationships between the ICQ-EV and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in all samples independent of other cognitive domains and general distress. In addition, those with OCD scored higher on the ICQ-EV than non-clinical controls and a mixed anxiety disorder group so confirming group-criterion validity. Finally, the ICQ-EV also showed clinical validity with change in ICQ-EV scores during treatment significantly related to successful treatment outcome.
KeywordsObsessive-compulsive disorder Inferential confusion Cognition Treatment outcome Questionnaires
The study was supported with a Fellowship Award from the Fond the la Recherche en Santé Quebec (FRSQ) and Grant No. MOP67059 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (text rev.) (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory (2nd ed.). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Brislin, R. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 137–164). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Brown, T. A., DiNardo, P. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1994a). Anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM-IV. Boulder: Graywind Publications.Google Scholar
- Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10, Retrieved March 18, 2009 from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7a.pdf.
- Éditions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée. (1998). Inventaire de dépression de Beck, BDI-II [Beck Depression Inventory]. Paris: Éditions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.Google Scholar
- Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Van Oppen, P., & Van Balkom, A. J. L. M. (2002). Cognitive changes in patients with obsessive-compulsive rituals treated with exposure in vivo and response prevention. In R. O. Frost & G. Steketee (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to obsessions and compulsions: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- Gardiner, W. P., & Gettinby, G. (1998). Experimental design techniques in statistical practice: A practical software-based approach. Chichester: Horwood Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Goodman, W. K., Price, L. H., Rasmussen, S. A., Mazure, C., Delgado, P., Heninger, G. R., et al. (1989a). The yale-brown obsessive compulsive scale. II Validity. Validity Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 1012–1016.Google Scholar
- Goodman, W. K., Price, L. H., Rasmussen, S. A., Mazure, C., Fleischman, R. L., Hill, C. L., et al. (1989b). The yale-brown obsessive compulsive scale. I. Development, use and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 1006–1011.Google Scholar
- O’Connor, K. P., & Robillard, S. (1999). A cognitive approach to modifying primary inferences in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13, 1–17.Google Scholar
- O’Connor, K., Aardema, F., Bouthillier, D., Fournier, S., Guay, S., Robillard, S., et al. (2005a). Evaluation of an inference based approach to treating obsessive-compulsive disorder. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 43, 1–16.Google Scholar
- O’Connor, K., Aardema, F., & Pélissier, M. C. (2005b). Beyond reasonable doubt: Reasoning processes in obsessive-compulsive and related disorders. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Radomsky, A. S., Ouimet, A. J., Ashbaugh, A. R., Lavoie, S. L., Parrish, C. L., & O’Connor, K. P. (2006). Psychometric properties of the French and English versions of the Vancouver obsessive-compulsive inventory and the symmetry ordering and arranging questionnaire. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 35, 164–173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taillon, A., O’Connor, K. P, Aardema, F., & Laverdure, A. (2007). The impact of overvalued ideation on obsessive-compulsive disorder symptomatology and treatment outcome. Poster Session presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy, Philadelphia, November.Google Scholar
- Taylor, S., Thordarson, D. S., & Söchting, I. (2002). Obsessive-compulsive disorder. In M. M. Antony & D. H. Barlow (Eds.), Handbook of assessment and treatment planning for psychological disorders (pp. 182–214). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1991). The mood and anxiety symptom questionnaire. Iowa City: University of Iowa. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar