Advertisement

Comparison of Three Self-Report Measures of Personality Pathology

  • Mayumi Okada
  • Thomas F. Oltmanns
Article

Abstract

Levels of convergence were examined among three personality instruments: the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders Questionnaire (SCID-IIQ) and the Multi-source Assessment of Personality Pathology (MAPP). Each personality questionnaire was administered three times in an alternating sequence over nine consecutive weekdays to a sample of college students. There was some degree of convergence among the three instruments, but there were also substantial empirical differences between them. The data suggest three related conclusions: (1) in general, the self-report version of the MAPP is more conservative than the other two questionnaires, (2) these questionnaires are not interchangeable measures of personality disorders, and (3) the breadth of measurement provided varies as a function of both the questionnaire and the personality disorder being measured.

Keywords

Personality disorders Questionnaires Self-report 

References

  1. Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227-257.S84.Google Scholar
  2. Davison, S., Leese, M., & Taylor, P. J. (2001). Examination of the screening properties of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire 4+ (PDQ-4+) in a prison population. Journal of Personality Disorders, 15, 180–194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ekselius, L., Lindstrèom, E., von Knorring, L., Bodlund, O., & Kullgren, G. (1994). SCID II interviews and the SCID Screen questionnaire as diagnostic tools for personality disorders in DSM-III–R. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 90, 120–123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, S. P., & Ruan, W. J. (2005). Co-occurrence of DSM-IV personality disorders in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 46, 1-5. Google Scholar
  5. Hyler, S. E. (1994). The personality diagnostic questionnaire 4+. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Hyler, S. E., & Rieder, R. O. (1987). PDQ-R: Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-revised. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Hyler, S. E., Skodol, A. E., Kellman, H. D., Oldham, J. M., & Rosnick, L. (1990). The validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire: a comparison with two structured interviews. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1043–1048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hyler, S. E., Skodol, A. E., Oldham, J. M., Kellman, H. D., & Doidge, N. (1992). Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised: a replication in an outpatient sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 33(2), 73–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobsberg, L., Perry, S., & Frances, A. (1995). Diagnostic agreement between the SCID-II screening questionnaire and the Personality Disorder Examination. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 428–433.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Klein, D. N. (2003). Patients’ versus informants’ reports of personality disorders in predicting 7 1/2 year outcome in outpatients with depressive disorders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 216–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. McDermut, W., & Zimmerman, M. (2005). Assessment instruments and standardized evaluation. In J. M. Oldham, A. E. Skodol, & D. S. Bender (Eds.), Textbook of personality disorders. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric.Google Scholar
  12. Lenzenweger, M. F., Lane, M. C., Loranger, A. W., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). DSM-IV personality disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biological Psychiatry, 62, 553-564.Google Scholar
  13. Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2006). Perceptions of self and others regarding pathological personality traits. In R. F. Krueger, & J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 71–111). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  14. Oltmanns, T. F., Turkheimer, E., & Strauss, M. E. (1998). Peer assessment of personality traits and pathology in female college students. Assessment, 5, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Perry, J. C. (1992). Problems and considerations in the valid assessment of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 1645–1653.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Skodol, A. E., Oldham, J. M., Rosnick, L., Kellman, H. D., & Hyler, S. E. (1991). Diagnosis of DSM-III-R personality disorders: a comparison with two structured interviews. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 1, 13–26.Google Scholar
  17. Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Gibbon, M., & First, M. B. (1990). Users guide for the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R: SCID. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric.Google Scholar
  18. Thomas, C., Turkheimer, E., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2003). Factorial structure of personality as evaluated by peers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 81–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Torgersen, S., Kringlen, E., & Cramer, V. (2001). The prevalence of personality disorders in a community sample. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 590–596.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Westen, D. (1997). Divergences between clinical and research methods for assessing personality disorders: Implications for research and the evolution of Axis II. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 895–903.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zimmerman, M., & Coryell, W. H. (1990). Diagnosing personality disorders in the community: A comparison of self-report and interview measures. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 527–531.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Washington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations