High-resolution NMR structure of the antimicrobial peptide protegrin-2 in the presence of DPC micelles
- 547 Downloads
PG-1 adopts a dimeric structure in dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) micelles, and a channel is formed by the association of several dimers but the molecular mechanisms of the membrane damage by non-α-helical peptides are still unknown. The formation of the PG-1 dimer is important for pore formation in the lipid bilayer, since the dimer can be regarded as the primary unit for assembly into the ordered aggregates. It was supposed that only 12 residues (RGGRL-CYCRR-RFCVC-V) are needed to endow protegrin molecules with strong antibacterial activity and that at least four additional residues are needed to add potent antifungal properties. Thus, the 16-residue protegrin (PG-2) represents the minimal structure needed for broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity encompassing bacteria and fungi. As the peptide conformation and peptide-to-membrane binding properties are very sensitive to single amino acid substitutions, the solution structure of PG-2 in solution and in a membrane mimicking environment are crucial. In order to find evidence if the oligomerization state of PG-1 in a lipid environment will be the same or not for another protegrins, we investigate in the present work the PG-2 NMR solution structure in the presence of perdeuterated DPC micelles. The NMR study reported in the present work indicates that PG-2 form a well-defined structure (PDB: 2MUH) composed of a two-stranded antiparallel β-sheet when it binds to DPC micelles.
KeywordsNMR Structure Protegrin Antimicrobial peptide DPC micelle
The work is performed accordingly to the Russian Government Program of Competitive Growth of Kazan Federal University; by the subsidy allocated to Kazan Federal University for the project part of the state assignment in the sphere of scientific activities and also supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant 14-04-31029 mol_a).
- Blochin DS, Aganova OV, Yulmetov AR, Filippov A, Gizatulin BL, Afonin S, Klochkov VV (2013) Spatial structure of heptapeptide Glu-Ile-Leu-Asn-His-Met-Lys, a fragment of the HIV enhancer prostatic acid phosphatase, in aqueous and SDS micelle solutions. J Mol Struct 1033:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2012.08.018 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Blokhin DS, Filippov AV, Antzutkin ON, Karataeva FK, Klochkov VV (2014) Spatial structure of oligopeptide PAP(248–261), the N-terminal fragment of the HIV enhancer prostatic acid phosphatase peptide PAP(248–286), in aqueous and SDS micelle solutions. J Mol Struct 1070:38–42. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.04.019 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Cho Y, Turner JS, Dinh NN, Lehrer RI (1998) Activity of protegrins against yeast-phase Candida albicans. Infect Immun 66:2486–2493Google Scholar
- Davis IW, Leaver-Fay A, Chen VB, Block JN, Kapral GJ, Wang X, Murray LW, Arendall WB III, Snoeyink J, Richardson JS, Richardson DC (2007) Molprobity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W375–W383. doi: 10.1093/Nar/Gkm216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gottler LM, Bea RD, Shelburne CE, Ramamoorthy A, Marsh ENG (2008) Using fluorous amino acids to probe the effects of changing hydrophobicity on the physical and biological properties of the beta-hairpin antimicrobial peptide protegrin-1. Biochemistry 47:9243–9250. doi: 10.1021/Bi801045n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Porcelli F, Buck-Koehntop BA, Thennarasu S, Ramamoorthy A, Veglia G (2006) Structures of the dimeric and monomeric variants of magainin antimicrobial peptides (MSI-78 and MSI-594) in micelles and bilayers, determined by NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry 45:5793–5799. doi: 10.1021/bi0601813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Steinberg DA et al (1997) Protegrin-1: a broad-spectrum, rapidly microbicidal peptide with in vivo activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:1738–1742Google Scholar
- Usachev KS, Filippov AV, Antzutkin ON, Klochkov VV (2013a) Use of a combination of the RDC method and NOESY NMR spectroscopy to determine the structure of Alzheimer’s amyloid A beta(10–35) peptide in solution and in SDS micelles. Eur Biophys J 42:803–810. doi: 10.1007/s00249-013-0928-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar