Advertisement

Journal of Biomolecular NMR

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 191–202 | Cite as

PINT: a software for integration of peak volumes and extraction of relaxation rates

  • Alexandra Ahlner
  • Mats Carlsson
  • Bengt-Harald Jonsson
  • Patrik Lundström
Article

Abstract

We present the software Peak INTegration (PINT), designed to perform integration of peaks in NMR spectra. The program is very simple to run, yet powerful enough to handle complicated spectra. Peaks are integrated by fitting predefined line shapes to experimental data and the fitting can be customized to deal with, for instance, heavily overlapped peaks. The results can be inspected visually, which facilitates systematic optimization of the line shape fitting. Finally, integrated peak volumes can be used to extract parameters such as relaxation rates and information about low populated states. The utility of PINT is demonstrated by applications to the 59 residue SH3 domain of the yeast protein Abp1p and the 289 residue kinase domain of murine EphB2.

Keywords

Peak integration Overlapped peaks Relaxation rates Protein dynamics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Cecilia Andresen and Janosch Hennig for their help in testing the program and Annica Theresia Blissing for critical reading of the manuscript. The Swedish NMR Center is acknowledged for kindly allowing us to use their spectrometers. This work was supported by a Grant from the Swedish Research Council to P.L.

Supplementary material

10858_2013_9737_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2796 kb)

References

  1. Carr HY, Purcell EM (1954) Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev 94:630–638ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clore GM, Szabo A, Bax A, Kay LE, Driscoll PC, Gronenborn AM (1990) Deviations from the simple two-parameter model-free approach to the interpretation of 15N nuclear magnetic relaxation of proteins. J Am Chem Soc 112:4989–4991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A (1995) NMRPipe—a multidimensional spectral processing system based on unix pipes. J Biomol NMR 6:277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dempsey CE (2001) Hydrogen exchange in peptides and proteins using NMR-spectroscopy. Prog Nucl Magn Res Spectrosc 39:135–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Drubin DG, Mulholland J, Zhu ZM, Botstein D (1990) Homology of a yeast actin-binding protein to signal transduction proteins and myosin-I. Nature 343:288–290ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gale NW, Holland SJ, Valenzuela DM, Flenniken A, Pan L, Ryan TE, Henkemeyer M, Strebhardt K, Hirai H, Wilkinson DG, Pawson T, Davis S, Yancopoulos GD (1996) Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses and are reciprocally compartmentalized during embryogenesis. Neuron 17:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goddard TD, Kneller DG SPARKY 3, San Francisco. Available from: http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/home/sparky/
  8. Hansen DF, Vallurupalli P, Kay LE (2008) An improved 15N relaxation dispersion experiment for the measurement of millisecond time-scale dynamics in proteins. J Phys Chem B 112:5898–5904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koradi R, Billeter M, Engeli M, Guntert P, Wuthrich K (1998) Automated peak picking and peak integration in macromolecular NMR spectra using AUTOPSY. J Magn Reson 135:288–297ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Korzhnev DM, Ibraghimov IV, Billeter M, Orekhov VY (2001) MUNIN: application of three-way decomposition to the analysis of heteronuclear NMR relaxation data. J Biomol NMR 21:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lila T, Drubin DG (1997) Evidence for physical and functional interactions among two Saccharomyces cerevisiae SH3 domain proteins, an adenylyl cyclase-associated protein and the actin cytoskeleton. Mol Biol Cell 8:367–385Google Scholar
  12. Lipari G, Szabo A (1982a) Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic-resonance relaxation in macromolecules.1. Theory and range of validity. J Am Chem Soc 104:4546–4559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lipari G, Szabo A (1982b) Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic-resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 2. Analysis of experimental results. J Am Chem Soc 104:4559–4570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Loria JP, Rance M, Palmer AG 3rd (1999) A relaxation-compensated Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill sequence for characterizing chemical exchange by NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 121:2331–2332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McConnell HM (1958) Reaction rates by nuclear magnetic resonance. J Chem Phys 28:430–431ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meiboom S, Gill D (1958) Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum 29:688–691ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mittermaier A, Kay LE (2006) New tools provide new insights in NMR studies of protein dynamics. Science 312:224–228ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mosteller F, Tukey JW (1977) Data analysis and regression. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. Mulder FAA, Skrynnikov NR, Hon B, Dahlquist FW, Kay LE (2001) Measurement of slow (μs-ms) time scale dynamics in protein side chains by 15N relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy: application to Asn and Gln residues in a cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme. J Am Chem Soc 123:967–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1988) Numerical recipes in C. University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Rath A, Davidson AR (2000) The design of a hyperstable mutant of the Abp1p SH3 domain by sequence alignment analysis. Protein Sci 9:2457–2469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Romano R, Paris D, Acernese F, Barone F, Motta A (2008) Fractional volume integration in two-dimensional NMR spectra: CAKE, a Monte Carlo approach. J Magn Reson 192:294–301ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stambulchik E (1998) Grace. Available from: http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Grace/
  24. Williams T, Kelley C (2010) Gnuplot 4.4: an interactive plotting program. Available from: http://www.gnuplot.info/

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Ahlner
    • 1
  • Mats Carlsson
    • 1
  • Bengt-Harald Jonsson
    • 1
  • Patrik Lundström
    • 1
  1. 1. Division of Molecular Biotechnology, Department of Physics, Chemistry and BiologyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations