Advertisement

Journal of Biomolecular NMR

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 127–139 | Cite as

Conformational analysis by quantitative NOE measurements of the β-proton pairs across individual disulfide bonds in proteins

  • Mitsuhiro Takeda
  • Tsutomu Terauchi
  • Masatsune Kainosho
Article

Abstract

NOEs between the β-protons of cysteine residues across disulfide bonds in proteins provide direct information on the connectivities and conformations of these important cross-links, which are otherwise difficult to investigate. With conventional [U-13C, 15N]-proteins, however, fast spin diffusion processes mediated by strong dipolar interactions between geminal β-protons prohibit the quantitative measurements and thus the analyses of long-range NOEs across disulfide bonds. We describe a robust approach for alleviating such difficulties, by using proteins selectively labeled with an equimolar mixture of (2R, 3S)-[β-13C; α,β-2H2] Cys and (2R, 3R)-[β-13C; α,β-2H2] Cys, but otherwise fully deuterated. Since either one of the prochiral methylene protons, namely β2 (proS) or β3 (proR), is always replaced with a deuteron and no other protons remain in proteins prepared by this labeling scheme, all four of the expected NOEs for the β-protons across disulfide bonds could be measured without any spin diffusion interference, even with long mixing times. Therefore, the NOEs for the β2 and β3 pairs across each of the disulfide bonds could be observed at high sensitivity, even though they are 25% of the theoretical maximum for each pair. With the NOE information, the disulfide bond connectivities can be unambiguously established for proteins with multiple disulfide bonds. In addition, the conformations around disulfide bonds, namely χ2 and χ3, can be determined based on the precise proton distances of the four β-proton pairs, by quantitative measurements of the NOEs across the disulfide bonds. The feasibility of this method is demonstrated for bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor, which has three disulfide bonds.

Keywords

SAIL Disulfide connectivities Disulfide conformation NOEs across disulfide bonds 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Targeted Proteins Research Program (TPRP) to M. K. and partially by Grants-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (21770110, 23770109) to M. T. and a Grant-in-Aid in Innovative Areas (4104) to M. K.

Supplementary material

10858_2011_9587_MOESM1_ESM.doc (522 kb)
NOESY spectra (the region of the Cys5-Cys55 across-disulfide NOEs) of the UL-Cys-labeled BPTI, the l-[β-13C; α,β 2/β 3-2H2] Cys-labeled BPTI and the (l-[β-13C; α,β 2/β 3-2H2] Cys, [U-2H])-labeled BPTI at NOE mixing times of 50 and 400 ms and the comparison of their NOE build-up curves. The 1H T1 of β-protons of the Cys-labeled BPTI and the l-[β-13C; α,β 2/β 3-2H2] Cys-labeled protein in a deuterated background. The computation of inter-proton distances between Cys β-protons across a disulfide bond. The T1 and T2 values of Cys 13Cβ atoms in (l-[β-13C; α,β 2/β 3-2H2] Cys, [U-2H])-labeled BPTI. The cross-relaxation rates of the across-disulfide NOEs and the corresponding effective distances. These are provided in the supporting information. Supplementary material 1 (DOC 522 kb)

References

  1. Altman JD, Henner D, Nilsson B, Anderson S, Kuntz ID (1991) Intracellular expression of BPTI fusion proteins and single column cleavage/affinity purification by chymotrypsin. Protein Eng 4:593–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold LD, Kalantar TH, Vederas JC (1985) Conversion of serine to stereochemically pure β-substituted α-amino acids via β-lactones. J Am Chem Soc 107:7105–7109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold LD, May RG, Vederas JC (1988) Synthesis of optically pure α-amino acids via salts of α-amino-β-propiolactone. J Am Chem Soc 110:2237–2241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berndt KD, Güntert P, Orbons LP, Wüthrich K (1992) Determination of a high-quality nuclear magnetic resonance solution structure of the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor and comparison with three crystal structures. J Mol Biol 277:757–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billeter M, Braun W, Wüthrich K (1982) Sequential resonance assignments in protein 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. Computation of sterically allowed proton–proton distances and statistical analysis of proton–proton distances in single crystal protein conformations. J Mol Biol 155:321–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd J, Hommel U, Campbell ID (1990) Influence of cross-correlation between dipolar and anisotropic chemical shift relaxation mechanisms upon longitudinal relaxation rates of 15N in macromolecules. Chem Phys Lett 175:477–482ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brüeschweiler R, Roux B, Blackledge M, Griesinger C, Karplus M, Ernst RR (1992) Influence of rapid intramolecular motion on NMR cross-relaxation rates. A molecular dynamics study of Antamanide in solution. J Am Chem Soc 114:2289–2302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavanagh J, Fairbrother WJ, Palmer AG, Skelton NJ, Rance M (2007) Protein NMR spectroscopy: principles and practice. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  9. Creighton TE (1984) Disulfide bond formation in proteins. Methods Enzymol 107:305–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goerke AR, Swartz JR (2008) Development of cell-free protein synthesis platforms for disulfide bonded proteins. Biotechnol Bioeng 99:351–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grey MJ, Wang C, Parmer AG (2003) Disulfide bond isomerization in basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor: multisite chemical exchange quantified by CPMG relaxation dispersion and chemical shift modeling. J Am Chem Soc 125:14324–14335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ikeya T, Takeda M, Yoshida H, Terauchi T, Jee JG, Kainosho M, Güntert P (2009) Automated NMR structure determination of stereo-array isotope labeled ubiquitin from minimal sets of spectra using the SAIL-FLYA system. J Biomol NMR 44:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kainosho M, Güntert P (2009) SAIL—stereo-array isotope labeling. Q Rev Biophys 42:247–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kainosho M, Torizawa T, Iwashita Y, Terauchi T, Ono AM, Güntert P (2006) Optimal isotope labelling for NMR protein structure determinations. Nature 440:52–57ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kari C, Nagy Z, Kovács P, Hernádi F (1971) Mechanism of the growth inhibitory effect of cysteine on Escherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol 68:349–356Google Scholar
  16. Kay LE, Torchia DA, Bax A (1989) Backbone dynamics of proteins as studied by 15N inverse detected heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy: application to staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry 28:8972–8979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kojima C, Ono A, Kainosho M, James TL (1998) DNA duplex dynamics: NMR relaxation studies of a decamer with uniformly 13C-labeled purine nucleotides. J Magn Reson 135:310–333ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar A, Wagner G, Ernst RR, Wüthrich K (1981) Buildup rates of the nuclear Overhauser effect measured by two-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: implications for studies of protein conformation. J Am Chem Soc 103:3654–3658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lane AN (1988) The influence of spin diffusion and internal motions on NOE intensities in proteins. J Magn Reson 78:425–439Google Scholar
  20. LeMaster DM (1996) Structural determinants of the catalytic reactivity of the buried cysteine of Escherichia coli thioredoxin. Biochemistry 35:14876–14881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lipari G, Szabo A (1982a) Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity. J Am Chem Soc 104:4546–4559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lipari G, Szabo A (1982b) Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 2. Analysis of experimental results. J Am Chem Soc 104:4559–4570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Macura S, Fejzo J, Westler WM, Markley JL (1994) Influence of slow internal motion in proteins on cross-relaxation rates determined by two-dimensional exchange spectroscopy. Bull Magn Reson 16:73–93Google Scholar
  24. Markley JL, Bax A, Arata Y, Hilbers CW, Kaptein R, Sykes BD, Wright PE, Wüthrich K (1998) Recommendations for the presentation of NMR structures of proteins and nucleic acids. J Mol Biol 280:933–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matsumura M, Matthews BW (1991) Stabilization of functional proteins by introduction of multiple disulfide bonds. Methods Enzymol 202:336–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miyanoiri Y, Takeda M, Jee J, Ono AM, Okuma K, Terauchi T, Kainosho M (2011) Alternative SAIL-Trp for robust aromatic signal assignment and determination of the χ(2) conformation by intra-residue NOEs. J Biomol NMR. doi: 10.1007/s10858-011-9568-3 (in press)
  27. Mobli M, King GF (2010) NMR methods for determining disulfide-bond connectivities. Toxicon 56:849–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mobli M, de Araújo AD, Lambert LK, Pierens GK, Windley MJ, Nicholson GM, Alewood PF, King GF (2009) Direct visualization of disulfide bonds through diselenide proxies using 77Se NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48:9312–9314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muchmore DC, McIntosh LP, Russell CB, Anderson DE, Dahlquist FW (1989) Expression and nitrogen-15 labeling of proteins for proton and nitrogen-15 nuclear magnetic resonance. Methods Enzymol 177:44–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olejniczak ET, Dobson CM, Karplus M, Levy RM (1984) Motional averaging of proton nuclear overhauser effects in proteins. Predictions from a molecular dynamics simulation of lysozyme. J Am Chem Soc 106:1923–1930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Otting G, Liepinsh E, Wüthrich K (1993) Disulfide bond isomerization in BPTI and BPTI (G36S): an NMR study of correlated mobility in proteins. Biochemistry 32:3571–3582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ozhogina OA, Bominaar EL (2009) Characterization of the kringle fold and identification of a ubiquitous new class of disulfide rotamers. J Struct Biol 168:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peng JW, Wagner G (1992) Mapping of spectral density functions using heteronuclear NMR relaxation measurements. J Magn Reson 98:308–322Google Scholar
  34. Ramer SE, Moore RN, Vederas JC (1986) Mechanism of formation of Serine β-lactones by Mitsunobu cyclization: synthesis and use of l-Serine stereospecifically labelled with deuterium at C-3. Can J Chem 64:706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Richardson JS (1981) The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. Adv Prot Chem 34:167–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roberts RB, Abelson PH, Cowie DB, Bolton ET, Britten RJ (1957) Studies of biosynthesis in Escherichia coli, vol 607. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publications, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. Schmidt B, Hogg PJ (2007) Search for allosteric disulfide bonds in NMR structures. BMC Struct Biol 7:49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmidt B, Ho L, Hogg PJ (2006) Allosteric disulfide bonds. Biochemistry 45:7429–7433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shaw DE, Maragakis P, Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, Eastwood MP, Bank JA, Jumper JM, Salmon JK, Shan Y, Wriggers W (2010) Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins. Science 330:341–346ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Skalicky JJ, Mills JL, Sharma S, Szyperski T (2001) Aromatic ring-flipping in supercooled water: implications for NMR-based structural biology of proteins. J Am Chem Soc 123:388–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Szyperski T, Luginbühl P, Otting G, Güntert P, Wüthrich K (1993) Protein dynamics studied by rotating frame 15N spin relaxation times. J Biomol NMR 3:151–164Google Scholar
  42. Takahashi H, Kainosho M, Akutsu H, Fujiwara T (2010) 1H-detected 1H-1H correlation spectroscopy of a stereo-array isotope labeled amino acid under fast magic-angle spinning. J Magn Reson 203:253–256ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Takeda M, Ikeya T, Güntert P, Kainosho M (2007) Automated structure determination of proteins with the SAIL-FLYA NMR method. Nat Protoc 2:2896–2902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Takeda M, Jee J, Ono AM, Terauchi T, Kainosho M (2009) Hydrogen exchange rate of tyrosine hydroxyl groups in proteins as studied by the deuterium isotope effect on Cζ chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc 131:18556–18562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Takeda M, Terauchi T, Ono AM, Kainosho M (2010a) Application of SAIL phenylalanine and tyrosine with alternative isotope-labeling patterns for protein structure determination. J Biomol NMR 46:45–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Takeda M, Jee J, Terauchi T, Kainosho M (2010b) Detection of the sulfhydryl groups in proteins with slow hydrogen exchange rates and determination of their proton/deuteron fractionation factors using the deuterium-induced effects on the 13Cβ NMR signals. J Am Chem Soc 132:6254–6260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Takeda M, Jee J, Ono AM, Terauchi T, Kainosho M (2011) Hydrogen exchange study on the hydroxyl groups of Serine and Threonine residues in proteins and structure refinement using NOE restraints with polar side-chain groups. J Am Chem Soc 133:17420–17427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Terauchi T, Kobayashi K, Okuma K, Oba M, Nishiyama K, Kainosho M (2008) Stereoselective synthesis of triply isotope-labeled Ser, Cys, and Ala: amino acids for stereoarray isotope labeling technology. Org Lett 10:2785–2787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Torizawa T, Shimizu M, Taoka M, Miyano H, Kainosho M (2004) Efficient production of isotopically labeled proteins by cell-free synthesis: a practical protocol. J Biomol NMR 30:311–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vögeli B, Segawa TF, Leitz D, Sobol A, Choutko A, Trzesniak D, van Gunsteren W, Riek R (2009) Exact distances and internal dynamics of perdeuterated ubiquitin from NOE buildups. J Am Chem Soc 131:17215–17225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vögeli B, Friedmann M, Leitz D, Sobol A, Riek R (2010) Quantitative determination of NOE rates in perdeuterated and protonated proteins: practical and theoretical aspects. J Magn Reson 204:290–302ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wagner G (1983) Characterization of the distribution of internal motions in the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor using a large number of internal NMR probes. Q Rev Biophys 16:1–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walewska A, Skalicky JJ, Davis DR, Zhang MM, Lopez-Vera E, Watkins M, Han TS, Yoshikami D, Olivera BM, Bulaj G (2008) NMR-based mapping of disulfide bridges in cysteine-rich peptides: application to the mu-conotoxin SxIIIA. J Am Chem Soc 130:14280–14286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Waugh DS (1996) Genetic tools for selective labeling of proteins with alpha-15N-amino acids. J Biomol NMR 8:148–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wlodawer A, Walter J, Huber R, Sjölin L (1984) Structure of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Results of joint neutron and X-ray refinement of crystal form II. J Mol Biol 180:301–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu J, Fan J, Pascal SM, Yang D (2004) General method for suppression of diagonal peaks in heteronuclear-edited NOESY spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 126:15018–15019CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mitsuhiro Takeda
    • 1
  • Tsutomu Terauchi
    • 2
  • Masatsune Kainosho
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Structural Biology Research Center, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Center for Priority Areas, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Tokyo Metropolitan UniversityHachiojiJapan

Personalised recommendations