Advertisement

Journal of Biomolecular NMR

, 51:235 | Cite as

Extensive de novo solid-state NMR assignments of the 33 kDa C-terminal domain of the Ure2 prion

  • Birgit Habenstein
  • Christian Wasmer
  • Luc Bousset
  • Yannick Sourigues
  • Anne Schütz
  • Antoine Loquet
  • Beat H. MeierEmail author
  • Ronald MelkiEmail author
  • Anja BöckmannEmail author
Article

Abstract

We present the de novo resonance assignments for the crystalline 33 kDa C-terminal domain of the Ure2 prion using an optimized set of five 3D solid-state NMR spectra. We obtained, using a single uniformly 13C, 15N labeled protein sample, sequential chemical-shift information for 74% of the N, Cα, Cβ triples, and for 80% of further side-chain resonances for these spin systems. We describe the procedures and protocols devised, and discuss possibilities and limitations of the assignment of this largest protein assigned today by solid-state NMR, and for which no solution-state NMR shifts were available. A comparison of the NMR chemical shifts with crystallographic data reveals that regions with high crystallographic B-factors are particularly difficult to assign. While the secondary structure elements derived from the chemical shift data correspond mainly to those present in the X-ray crystal structure, we detect an additional helical element and structural variability in the protein crystal, most probably originating from the different molecules in the asymmetric unit, with the observation of doubled resonances in several parts, including entire stretches, of the protein. Our results provide the point of departure towards an atomic-resolution structural analysis of the C-terminal Ure2p domain in the context of the full-length prion fibrils.

Keywords

Prion Solid-state NMR Fibrils Sequential assignment Conformational heterogeneity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-07-PCVI-0013-03, ANR-06-BLAN-0266, ANR-PCV08 321323, and ANR08-PCVI-0022-02), the ETH Zurich, the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant 200020_124611) and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. We also acknowledge support from the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7), contract Bio-NMR 261863.

Supplementary material

10858_2011_9530_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (3.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 3937 kb)

References

  1. Andronesi OC, Becker S, Seidel K, Heise H, Young HS, Baldus M (2005) Determination of membrane protein structure and dynamics by magic-angle-spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 127:12965–12974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andronesi O, von Bergen M, Biernat J, Seidel K, Griesinger C, Mandelkow E, Baldus M (2008) Characterization of Alzheimer’s-like paired helical filaments from the core domain of tau protein using solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 130(130):5922–5928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Böckmann A, Lange A, Galinier A, Luca S, Giraud N, Juy M, Heise H, Montserret R, Penin F, Baldus M (2003) Solid-state NMR sequential resonance assignments and conformational analysis of the 2 × 10.4 kDa dimeric form of the Bacillus subtilis protein Crh. J Biomol NMR 27:323–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Böckmann A, Gardiennet C, Verel R, Hunkeler A, Loquet A, Pintacuda G, Emsley L, Meier BH, Lesage A (2009) Characterization of different water pools in solid-state NMR protein samples. J Biomol NMR 45(3):319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bousset L, Belrhali H, Janin J, Melki R, Morera S (2001) Structure of the globular region of the prion protein Ure2 from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Structure 9(1):39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castellani F, van Rossum B, Diehl A, Schubert M, Rehbein K, Oschkinat H (2002) Structure of a protein determined by solid-state magic-angle-spinning NMR spectroscopy. Nature 420:98–102ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferguson N, Becker J, Tidow H, Tremmel S, Sharpe TD, Krause G, Flinders J, Petrovich M, Berriman J, Oschkinat H, Fersht AR (2006) General structural motifs of amyloid protofilaments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(44):16248–16253ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Franks WT, Zhou DH, Wylie BJ, Money BG, Graesser DT, Frericks HL, Sahota G, Rienstra CM (2005) Magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy of the beta1 immunoglobulin binding domain of protein G (GB1): 15N and 13C chemical shift assignments and conformational analysis. J Am Chem Soc 127(35):12291–12305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franks WT, Wylie BJ, Schmidt HL, Nieuwkoop AJ, Mayrhofer RM, Shah GJ, Graesser DT, Rienstra CM (2008) Dipole tensor-based atomic-resolution structure determination of a nanocrystalline protein by solid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(12):4621–4626ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldbourt A, Day LA, McDermott AE (2007) Assignment of congested NMR spectra: carbonyl backbone enrichment via the Entner-Doudoroff pathway. J Magn Reson 189(2):157–165ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halle B (2002) Flexibility and packing in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(3):1274–1279ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Helmus JJ, Surewicz K, Nadaud PS, Surewicz WK, Jaroniec CP (2008) Molecular conformation and dynamics of the Y145Stop variant of human prion protein in amyloid fibrils. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(17):6284–6289ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Higman VA, Flinders J, Hiller M, Jehle S, Markovic S, Fiedler S, van Rossum BJ, Oschkinat H (2009) Assigning large proteins in the solid state: a MAS NMR resonance assignment strategy using selectively and extensively 13C-labelled proteins. J Biomol NMR 44(4):245–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD—Visual molecular dynamics. J Molec Graphics 14(1):33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Igumenova TI, Wand AJ, McDermott AE (2004) Assignment of the backbone resonances for microcrystalline ubiquitin. J Am Chem Soc 126(16):5323–5331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iwata K, Fujiwara T, Matsuki Y, Akutsu H, Takahashi S, Naiki H, Goto Y (2006) 3D structure of amyloid protofilaments of beta2-microglobulin fragment probed by solid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(48):18119–18124ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaroniec CP, MacPhee CE, Bajaj VS, McMahon MT, Dobson CM, Griffin RG (2004) High-resolution molecular structure of a peptide in an amyloid fibril determined by magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(3):711–716ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jehle S, van Rossum B, Stout JR, Noguchi SM, Falber K, Rehbein K, Oschkinat H, Klevit RE, Rajagopal P (2009) alphaB-crystallin: a hybrid solid-state/solution-state NMR investigation reveals structural aspects of the heterogeneous oligomer. J Mol Biol 385(5):1481–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kohlhoff KJ, Robustelli P, Cavalli A, Salvatella X, Vendruscolo M (2009) Fast and accurate predictions of protein NMR chemical shifts from interatomic distances. J Am Chem Soc 131(39):13894–13895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lange A, Becker S, Seidel K, Giller K, Pongs O, Baldus M (2005) A concept for rapid protein-structure determination by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:2–5Google Scholar
  21. Loquet A, Bardiaux B, Gardiennet C, Blanchet C, Baldus M, Nilges M, Malliavin T, Boeckmann A (2008) 3D structure determination of the Crh protein from highly ambiguous solid-state NMR restraints. J Am Chem Soc 130(11):3579–3589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loquet A, Bousset L, Gardiennet C, Sourigues Y, Wasmer C, Habenstein B, Schütz A, Meier BH, Melki R, Böckmann A (2009) Prion fibrils of Ure2p assembled under physiological conditions contain highly ordered, natively folded modules. J Mol Biol 394:108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manolikas T, Herrmann T, Meier BH (2008) Protein structure determination from 13C Spin-diffusion solid-state. NMR J Am Chem Soc 130(12):3959–3966Google Scholar
  24. Marulanda D, Tasayco ML, Cataldi M, Arriaran V, Polenova T (2005) Resonance assignments and secondary structure analysis of E. coli thioredoxin by magic angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B (109):18135–18145Google Scholar
  25. McDermott A, Polenova T, Böckmann A, Zilm KW, Paulsen EK, Martin RW, Montelione GT (2000) Partial NMR assignments for uniformly (13C, 15N)-enriched BPTI in the solid state. J Biomol NMR 16:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neal S, Nip AM, Zhang H, Wishart DS (2003) Rapid and accurate calculation of protein 1H, 13C and 15N chemical shifts. J Biomol NMR 26(3):215–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nielsen JT, Bjerring M, Jeppesen MD, Pedersen RO, Pedersen JM, Hein KL, Vosegaard T, Skrydstrup T, Otzen DE, Nielsen NC (2009) Unique identification of supramolecular structures in amyloid fibrils by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 48(12):2118–2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pauli J, Baldus M, van Rossum B, de Groot H, Oschkinat H (2001) Backbone and side-chain C-13 and N-15 signal assignments of the alpha-spectrin SH3 domain by magic angle spinning solid-state NMR at 17.6 tesla. Chembiochem 2(4):272–281Google Scholar
  29. Petkova AT, Ishii Y, Balbach JJ, Antzutkin ON, Leapman RD, Delaglio F, Tycko R (2002) A structural model for Alzheimer’s beta -amyloid fibrils based on experimental constraints from solid state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(26):16742–16747ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pierce MM, Baxa U, Steven AC, Bax A, Wickner RB (2005) Is the prion domain of soluble Ure2p unstructured? Biochemistry 44(1):321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pintacuda G, Giraud N, Pierattelli R, Bockmann A, Bertini I, Emsley L (2007) Solid-state NMR spectroscopy of a paramagnetic protein: assignment and study of human dimeric oxidized CuII-ZnII superoxide dismutase (SOD). Angew Chem Int Ed 46(7):1079–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prusiner SB (1982) Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science 216:136–144ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schanda P, Meier BH, Ernst M (2010) Quantitative analysis of protein backbone dynamics in microcrystalline ubiquitin by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 132(45):15957–15967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schanda P, Meier BH, Ernst M (2011) Accurate measurement of one-bond H-X heteronuclear dipolar couplings in MAS solid-state NMR. J Magn Reson 210(2):246–259Google Scholar
  35. Schneider R, Ader C, Lange A, Giller K, Hornig S, Pongs O, Becker S, Baldus M (2008) Solid-state NMR spectroscopy applied to a chimeric potassium channel in lipid bilayers. J Am Chem Soc 130(23):7427–7435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schuetz A, Wasmer C, Habenstein B, Verel R, Greenwald J, Riek R, Böckmann A, Meier BH (2010) Protocols for the sequential solid-state NMR spectroscopic assignment of a uniformly labeled 25 kDa protein: HET-s(1–227). ChemBioChem 11(11):1543–1551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shen Y, Bax A (2007) Protein backbone chemical shifts predicted from searching a database for torsion angle and sequence homology. J Biomol NMR 38(4):289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Siemer AB, Arnold AA, Ritter C, Westfeld T, Ernst M, Riek R, Meier BH (2006a) Observation of highly flexible residues in amyloid fibrils of the HET-s prion. J Am Chem Soc 128(40):13224–13228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Siemer AB, Ritter C, Steinmetz MO, Ernst M, Riek R, Meier BH (2006b) 13C, 15N resonance assignment of parts of the HET-s prion protein in its amyloid form. J Biomol NMR 34(2):75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spera S, Bax A (1991) Empirical correlation between protein backbone conformation and Cα and Cβ 13C nuclaer magnetic resonance chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc 113:5490–5492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sperling LJ, Berthold DA, Sasser TL, Jeisy-Scott V, Rienstra CM (2010) Assignment strategies for large proteins by magic-angle spinning NMR: the 21-kDa disulfide-bond-forming enzyme DsbA. J Mol Biol 399(2):268–282Google Scholar
  42. Thual C, Komar AA, Bousset L, Fernandez-Bellot E, Cullin C, Melki R (1999) Structural characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae prion-like protein Ure2. J Biol Chem 274(19):13666–13674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thual C, Bousset L, Komar AA, Walter S, Buchner J, Cullin C, Melki R (2001) Stability, folding, dimerization, and assembly properties of the yeast prion Ure2p. Biochemistry 40(6):1764–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ulrich EL, Akutsu H, Doreleijers JF, Harano Y, Ioannidis YE, Lin J, Livny M, Mading S, Maziuk D, Miller Z, Nakatani E, Schulte CF, Tolmie DE, Kent Wenger R, Yao H, Markley JL (2008) BioMagResBank. Nucleic Acids Res 36(Database issue):D402–D408Google Scholar
  45. Van Melckebeke H, Wasmer C, Lange A, Ab E, Loquet A, Böckmann A, Meier BH (2010) Atomic-resolution three-dimensional structure of HET-s(218-289) amyloid fibrils by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 132(39):13765–13775Google Scholar
  46. Vranken WF, Boucher W, Stevens TJ, Fogh RH, Pajon A, Llinas M, Ulrich EL, Markley JL, Ionides J, Laue ED (2005) The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteins 59(4):687–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang YJ, Jardetzky O (2002) Probability-based protein secondary structure identification using combined NMR chemical-shift data. Protein Sci 11(4):852–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wasmer C, Lange A, Melckebeke HV, Siemer AB, Riek R, Meier BH (2008) Amyloid fibrils of the HET-s(218–289) prion form a beta solenoid with a triangular hydrophobic core. Science 319:1523–1526ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wishart DS, Sykes BD (1994) The 13C chemical-shift index: a simple method for the identification of protein secondary structure using 13 chemical-shift data. J Biomol NMR 4:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wishart DS, Sykes BD, Richards FM (1991) Relationship between nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shift and protein secondary structure. J Mol Biol 222(2):311–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Birgit Habenstein
    • 1
  • Christian Wasmer
    • 2
    • 3
  • Luc Bousset
    • 4
  • Yannick Sourigues
    • 4
  • Anne Schütz
    • 3
  • Antoine Loquet
    • 1
    • 5
  • Beat H. Meier
    • 3
    Email author
  • Ronald Melki
    • 4
    Email author
  • Anja Böckmann
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institut de Biologie et Chimie des ProtéinesUMR 5086 CNRS/Université de Lyon 1LyonFrance
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Physical ChemistryETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Laboratoire d’Enzymologie et Biochimie StructuralesUPR 3082 CNRSGif-sur-YvetteFrance
  5. 5.Max Planck Institute for Biophysical ChemistryGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations