High resolution 4-D spectroscopy with sparse concentric shell sampling and FFT-CLEAN
- 244 Downloads
Recent efforts to reduce the measurement time for multidimensional NMR experiments have fostered the development of a variety of new procedures for sampling and data processing. We recently described concentric ring sampling for 3-D NMR experiments, which is superior to radial sampling as input for processing by a multidimensional discrete Fourier transform. Here, we report the extension of this approach to 4-D spectroscopy as Randomized Concentric Shell Sampling (RCSS), where sampling points for the indirect dimensions are positioned on concentric shells, and where random rotations in the angular space are used to avoid coherent artifacts. With simulations, we show that RCSS produces a very low level of artifacts, even with a very limited number of sampling points. The RCSS sampling patterns can be adapted to fine rectangular grids to permit use of the Fast Fourier Transform in data processing, without an apparent increase in the artifact level. These artifacts can be further reduced to the noise level using the iterative CLEAN algorithm developed in radioastronomy. We demonstrate these methods on the high resolution 4-D HCCH-TOCSY spectrum of protein G’s B1 domain, using only 1.2% of the sampling that would be needed conventionally for this resolution. The use of a multidimensional FFT instead of the slow DFT for initial data processing and for subsequent CLEAN significantly reduces the calculation time, yielding an artifact level that is on par with the level of the true spectral noise.
KeywordsFast NMR Sparse sampling FFT-CLEAN
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (2R01AI055588), the Whitehead Foundation and the Duke University Bridge Fund.
- Barna JCJ, Laue ED (1987) Conventional and exponential sampling for 2D NMR experiments with application to a 2D NMR spectrum of a protein. J Magn Reson 75:384–389Google Scholar
- Barna JCJ, Laue ED, Mayger MR, Skilling J, Worrall SJP (1987) Exponential sampling, an alternative method for sampling in two-dimensional NMR experiments. J Magn Reson 73:69–77Google Scholar
- Barna JCJ, Tan SM, Laue ED (1988) Use of CLEAN in conjunction with selective data sampling for 2D NMR experiments. J Magn Reson 78:327–332Google Scholar
- Bretthorst GL (2001) Nonuniform sampling: bandwidth and aliasing. In: Rychert JT, Erickson GJ, Smith CR (eds) Bayesian inference and maximum entropy methods in science and engineering. American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, pp 1–28Google Scholar
- Davies SJ, Bauer C, Hore PJ, Freeman R (1988) Resolution enhancement by nonlinear data processing. “HOGWASH” and the maximum entropy method. J Magn Reson 76:476–493Google Scholar
- Hoch JC, Stern AS (1996) NMR data processing. Wiley-Liss, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Keeler J (1984) Elimination of truncation artifacts from NMR spectra. Application to carbon-13 multiplicity determination by two-dimensional spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 56:463–470Google Scholar
- Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1992) Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Shaka AJ, Keeler J, Freeman R (1984) Separation of chemical shifts and spin coupling in proton NMR. Elimination of dispersion signals from two-dimensional spectra. J Magn Reson 56:294–313Google Scholar
- Szyperski T, Wider G, Bushweller JH, Wüthrich K (1993a) 3D 13C–15N-heteronuclear two-spin coherence spectroscopy for polypeptide backbone assignments in 13C–15N-double-labeled proteins. J Biomol NMR 3:127–132Google Scholar