Four-dimensional heteronuclear correlation experiments for chemical shift assignment of solid proteins
- 416 Downloads
Chemical shift assignment is the first step in all established protocols for structure determination of uniformly labeled proteins by NMR. The explosive growth in recent years of magic-angle spinning (MAS) solid-state NMR (SSNMR) applications is largely attributable to improved methods for backbone and side-chain chemical shift correlation spectroscopy. However, the techniques developed so far have been applied primarily to proteins in the size range of 5–10 kDa, despite the fact that SSNMR has no inherent molecular weight limits. Rather, the degeneracy inherent to many 2D and 3D SSNMR spectra of larger proteins has prevented complete unambiguous chemical shift assignment. Here we demonstrate the implementation of 4D backbone chemical shift correlation experiments for assignment of solid proteins. The experiments greatly reduce spectral degeneracy at a modest cost in sensitivity, which is accurately described by theory. We consider several possible implementations and investigate the CANCOCX pulse sequence in detail. This experiment involves three cross polarization steps, from H to CA[i], CA[i] to N[i], and N[i] to C′[i−1], followed by a final homonuclear mixing period. With short homonuclear mixing times (<20 ms), backbone correlations are observed with high sensitivity; with longer mixing times (>200 ms), long-range correlations are revealed. For example, a single 4D experiment with 225 ms homonuclear mixing time reveals ∼200 uniquely resolved medium and long-range correlations in the 56-residue protein GB1. In addition to experimental demonstrations in the 56-residue protein GB1, we present a theoretical analysis of anticipated improvements in resolution for much larger proteins and compare these results in detail with the experiments, finding good agreement between experiment and theory under conditions of stable instrumental performance.
KeywordsSolid-state NMR Multidimensional NMR Protein structure Magic-angle spinning Chemical shift assignments
We thank G. Shah and H. Frericks for preparing the GB1 samples used in this study. This work was supported by the University of Illinois, National Science Foundation (CAREER Award MCB0347824 to CMR), Research Corporation (Cottrell Scholars Awards to CMR) and National Institutes of Health (GM073770 to CMR).
- Barkhuijsen H, Debeer R, Vanormondt D (1987) Improved algorithm for noniterative time-domain model-fitting to exponentially damped magnetic-resonance signals. J Magn Reson 73:553–557Google Scholar
- Carravetta M, Zhao X, Johannessen OG, Lai WC, Verhoeven MA, Bovee-Geurts PHM, Verdegem PJE, Kiihne S, Luthman H, De Groot HJM, DeGrip WJ, Lugtenburg J, Levitt MH (2004) Protein-induced bonding perturbation of the rhodopsin chromophore detected by double-quantum solid-state NMR. J Am Chem Soc 126:3948–3953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Franks WT, Zhou DH, Wylie BJ, Money BG, Graesser DT, Frericks HL, Sahota G, Rienstra CM (2005) Magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy of the beta 1 immunoglobulin binding domain of protein G (GB1): N-15 and C-13 chemical shift assignments and conformational analysis. J Am Chem Soc 127:12291–12305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goddard TD, Kneller DG (2006) Sparky 2.116. University of California, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Hing A, Vega S, Schaefer J (1992) Transferred-echo double-resonance NMR. J Magn Reson 96:205–209Google Scholar
- Hoch JC, Stern AS (2001) Maximum entropy reconstruction, spectrum analysis and deconvolution in multidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance, Meth Enzym 338:159–178Google Scholar
- Hu JG, Sun BQ, Griffin RG, Herzfeld J (1995) Solid state NMR detection of multiple m-intermediates in bacteriorhodopsin. Biophys J 68:A332Google Scholar
- Marulanda D, Tasayco ML, McDermott A, Cataldi M, Arriaran V, Polenova T (2004) Magic angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy for structural studies of protein interfaces. Resonance assignments of differentially enriched escherichia coli thioredoxin reassembled by fragment complementation. J Am Chem Soc 126:16608–16620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schaefer J, Stejskal EO (1979) Double cross polarization NMR of solids. J Magn Reson 34:443–447Google Scholar