Advertisement

Journal of Biomolecular NMR

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 225–233 | Cite as

An economic approach to isotopic enrichment of glycoproteins expressed from Sf9 insect cells

  • Wendy J. Walton
  • Agnieszka J. Kasprzak
  • Joan T. Hare
  • Timothy M. Logan
Article

Abstract

It is estimated that over half of all proteins are glycosylated, yet only a small number of the structures in the protein data bank are of intact glycoproteins. One of the reasons for the lack of structural information on glycoproteins is the high cost of isotopically labeling proteins expressed from eukaryotic cells such as in insect and mammalian cells. In this paper we describe modifications to commercial insect cell growth medium that reduce the cost for isotopically labeling recombinant proteins expressed from Sf9 cells. A key aspect of this work was to reduce the amount of glutamine in the cell culture medium while maintaining sufficient energy yielding metabolites for vigorous growth by supplementing with glucose and algae-derived amino acids. We present an analysis of cell growth and protein production in Sf9 insect cells expressing secreted Thy1-GFP fusion construct. We also demonstrate isotopic enrichment of the Thy-1 protein backbone with 15N and carbohydrates with 13C by NMR spectroscopy.

Keywords

baculovirus glycoproteins isotopic labeling NMR Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) cells Thy-1 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Margaret Seavy and Bruce Smith for their assistance with amino acid and sugar analysis, Dr. Marc Freeman for use of his vapor pressure osmometer, and Jacqueline Kitchen for help in preparing the baculovirus. We also thank John Glushka at the Complex Carbohydrate Research Center (Athens, GA) for collecting spectra. Support for this project was given to T.M.L. from the Florida State University Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and a Research Foundation grant (015789). This research benefited from facilities at the Southeast Collaboratory for High-Field Biomolecular NMR, a resource funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM66340) and the Georgia Research Alliance. W.J.W. was supported by an NSF GK-12 teaching fellowship (DGE-0139299).

Supplementary material

10858_2006_9086_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (175 kb)
Supplementary Material (PDF 178 KB)

References

  1. Apweiler R., Hermjakob H., Sharon N., (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1473: 4–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bédard C., Tom R., Kamen A., (1993) Biotechnol. Prog. 9: 615–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brüggert M., Rehm T., Shanker S., Georgescu J., Holak T.A., (2003) J. Biomol. NMR 25: 335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delaglio F., Grzesiek S., Vuister G.W., Zhu G., Pfeifer J., Bax A., (1995) J. Biomol. NMR 6: 277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doverskog M., Jacobsson U., Chapman B.E., Kuchel P.W., Häggström L., (2000) J. Biotechnol. 79: 87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doverskog M., Ljunggren J., Öhman L., HäggstrÖm L., (1997) J. Biotechnol. 59: 103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drews M., Doverskog M., Öhman L., Chapman B.E., Jacobsson U., Kuchel P.W., HäggstrÖm L., (2000) J. Biotechnol. 78: 23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haeryfar S.M.M., Hoskin D.W., (2004) J. Immunol. 173: 3581–3588Google Scholar
  9. Hansen A.P., Petros A.M., Mazar A.P., Pederson T.M., Rueter A., Fesik S.W., (1992) Biochemistry 31: 12713–12718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson B.A., Blevins R.A., (1994) J. Biomol. NMR 4: 603–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kay L.E., Keifer P., Saarinen T., (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114: 10663–10665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. LeMaster D.M., Richards R.M., (1982) Analy. Biochem. 122: 238–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mehndiratta P., Walton W.J., Hare J.T., Pulido S., Parthasarathy G., Emmett M.R., Marshall A.G., Logan T.M., (2004) Protein Expr. Purif. 33: 274–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mori S., Abeygunawardana C., Johnson M.O.N., van Zijl P.C.M., (1995) J. Magn. Reson. 108B: 94–98Google Scholar
  15. Öhman L., Alarcon M., Ljunggren J., Ramqvist A., HäggstrÖm L., (1996) Biotechnol. Lett. 18: 765–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pervushin K., Riek R., Wider G., Wüthrich K., (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94: 12366–12371ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rege T.A., Hagood J.S., (2006) FASEB J. 20: 1045–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sørensen P., Poulsen F.M., (1992) J. Biomol. NMR 2: 99–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Strauss A., Bitsch F., Cutting B., Fendrich G., Graff P., Liebetanz J., Zurini M., Jahnke W., (2003) Biomol. NMR 26: 367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Strauss A., Bitsch F., Fendrich G., Graff P., Knecht R., Meyhack B., Jahnke W., (2005) Biomol. NMR 31: 343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Valley U., Nimtz M., Conradt H.S., Wagner R., (1999) Biotechnol. Bioeng. 64: 401–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendy J. Walton
    • 1
  • Agnieszka J. Kasprzak
    • 2
  • Joan T. Hare
    • 1
  • Timothy M. Logan
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Molecular BiophysicsFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistryFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  3. 3.National High Magnetic Field LaboratoryTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations