General method of preparation of uniformly 13C, 15N-labeled DNA fragments for NMR analysis of DNA structures
- 83 Downloads
13C, 15N labeling of biomolecules allows easier assignments of NMR resonances and provides a larger number of NMR parameters, which greatly improves the quality of DNA structures. However, there is no general DNA-labeling procedure, like those employed for proteins and RNAs. Here, we describe a general and widely applicable approach designed for preparation of isotopically labeled DNA fragments that can be used for NMR studies. The procedure is based on the PCR amplification of oligonucleotides in the presence of labeled deoxynucleotides triphosphates. It allows great flexibility thanks to insertion of a short DNA sequence (linker) between two repeats of DNA sequence to study. Size and sequence of the linker are designed as to create restriction sites at the junctions with DNA of interest. DNA duplex with desired sequence and size is released upon enzymatic digestion of the PCR product. The suitability of the procedure is validated through the preparation of two biological relevant DNA fragments.
KeywordsDNA isotope labeling NMR PCR structural analysis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work was financially supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Research (to G.M.).
- Batey, R.T., Battiste, J.L., Williamson, J.R. (1995) Methods Enzymol., 261, 300–322Google Scholar
- Batey R.T., Inada M., Kujawinski E. et al (1992) Nucleic Acids Res 17:4515–4523Google Scholar
- Clore, G.M. and Gronenborn, A.M. (1994a) Methods Enzymol., 239, 349–363Google Scholar
- Fossé P, René B, Le Bret M, et al. (1991) Nucl. Acids Res. 11:2861–2868Google Scholar
- Katzman, M. and Katz, R.A. (1999) Adv. Virus Res., 52, 371–395Google Scholar
- Kojima, C., Ono, A. and Ono, A. et al. (2001) Methods Enzymol., 338, 261–283Google Scholar
- Ono A., Tate S. and Kainosho M. (1995) Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso 10:1509–1517Google Scholar
- Werner, M.H., Gupta, V. and Lambert, L.J. et al. (2001) Methods Enzymol., 338, 283–304Google Scholar