Advertisement

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 433–458 | Cite as

Learning about issues of equity in secondary mathematics teacher education programs

  • Alexia MintosEmail author
  • Andrew J. Hoffman
  • Elizabeth Kersey
  • Jill Newton
  • Dana Smith
Article

Abstract

Understanding how mathematics preservice teachers (M-PSTs) learn about issues of equity is essential to addressing the inequities that persist in mathematics education. In this article, we use (Gutiérrez, in: Herbel-Eisenmann, Choppin, Wagner, Pimm (eds) Equity in discourse for mathematics education: theories, practices, and policies, Springer, New York, 2012a) aspects of equity (i.e., access, achievement, identity, and power) to describe the reported opportunities to learn about equity (Equity OTLs) in five purposefully chosen secondary mathematics teacher education programs. Data included interviews with M-PSTs and instructors from four types of courses—mathematics content, mathematics for teachers, mathematics education, and general education—in each program. The mathematics- and algebra-specific Equity OTLs were most frequently related to issues of access and achievement, whereas the Equity OTLs reported in general education courses were more often related to issues of power and identity. In addition, the two programs housed in universities with more diverse populations had a relatively greater reported emphasis on equity. Implications for teacher education and future research are discussed.

Keywords

Equity Diversity Secondary mathematics teacher education Opportunity to learn 

References

  1. Aguirre, J. M., Turner, E. E., Bartell, T. G., Kalinec-Craig, C., Foote, M. Q., McDuffie, A. R., et al. (2013). Making connections in practice: How prospective elementary teachers connect to children’s mathematical thinking and community funds of knowledge in mathematics instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 178–192.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112466900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2015). Position: Equity in mathematics teacher education. Retrieved from https://amte.net/sites/default/files/amte_equityposistionstatement_sept2015.pdf.
  3. Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2017). Standards for preparing teachers of mathematics. Retrieved from https://amte.net/sites/default/files/SPTM.pdf.
  4. Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting “relational equity” and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed-ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167–194.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701532145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Freitas, E. (2008). Troubling teacher identity: Preparing mathematics teachers to teach for diversity. Teaching Education, 19(1), 43–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210701860024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Desimone, L. M., Bartlett, P., Gitomer, M., Mohsin, Y., Pottinger, D., & Wallace, J. D. (2013). What they wish they had learned: Middle school math teachers feel unprepared for the diversity in their classrooms and short on content knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(7), 62–65.  https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309400719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315.  https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forman, E. A. (1996). Learning mathematics as participation in classroom practice: Implications of sociocultural theory of educational reform. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 115–130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Freire, P. (2005). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare to teach. Cambridge, MA: Westview.Google Scholar
  10. Gee, J. P. (2008). A sociocultural perspective on opportunity to learn. In P. A. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 76–108). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511802157.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 17–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gutiérrez, R. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: Toward a new equity research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 145–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gutiérrez, R. (2009). Framing equity: Helping students “play the game” and “change the game”. Teaching for Excellence and Equity, 1(1), 4–9.Google Scholar
  14. Gutiérrez, R. (2012a). Context matters: How do we conceptualize equity in mathematics education? In B. Herbel-Eisenmann, J. Choppin, D. Wagner, & D. Pimm (Eds.), Equity in discourse for mathematics education: Theories, practices, and policies (pp. 17–33). New York, NY: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2813-4_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gutiérrez, R. (2012b). Embracing Nepantla: Rethinking “knowledge” and its use in mathematics teaching. REDIMAT—Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 29–56.  https://doi.org/10.4471/redimat.2012.02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gutiérrez, R. (2013a). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68.  https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gutiérrez, R. (2013b). Why (urban) mathematics teachers need political knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(2), 7–19.Google Scholar
  18. Gutiérrez, R. (2015). HOLA: Hunt for opportunities-learn-act: Suggestions for listening to Latin@ students in their everyday interactions. Mathematics Teacher, 109(4), 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gutstein, E. (2012). Foreword. In L. J. Jacobsen, J. Mistele, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education in the public interest: Equity and social justice (pp. xi–xv). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  21. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2013). The co-construction of learning difficulties in mathematics—teacher–student interactions and their role in the development of a disabled mathematical identity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83, 341–368.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9457-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacobsen, L. J., & Mistele, J. (2011). Mathematics education: What is the point? In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 555–568). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Jacobsen, L. J., Mistele, J., & Sriraman, B. (2012). Introduction. In L. J. Jacobsen, J. Mistele, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education in the public interest: Equity and social justice (pp. xix–xxvi). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  24. Kilpatrick, J., & Izsák, A. (2008). A history of algebra in the school curriculum. In C. E. Greenes & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Algebra and algebraic thinking in school mathematics (pp. 3–18). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  25. Ladson-Billings, G. (2000). Fighting for our lives: Preparing teachers to teach African–American students. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 206–214.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051003008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U. S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035007003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Landers, M. G. (2013). Towards a theory of mathematics homework as a social practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84, 371–391.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9487-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loveless, T. (2008). The misplaced math student: Lost in eighth-grade algebra. Washington, DC: The Brown Center on Educational Policy.Google Scholar
  29. Lubienski, S. (2006). School sector and academic achievement: A multi-level analysis of NAEP mathematics data. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 651–698.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043004651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maeda, Y., Alexander, V. G., Newton, J. & Senk S. L. (2014). Development of a national survey for secondary mathematics teacher education programs: Challenges and lessons learned. Assessment Update, 26(3), 5–6, 12–13Google Scholar
  31. Meaney, T., & Evans, D. (2013). What is the responsibility of mathematics education to the Indigenous students that it serves? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 481–496.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9439-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  33. Nasir, N. S., Cabana, C., Shreve, B., Woodbury, E., & Louie, N. (Eds.). (2014). Mathematics for equity: A framework for successful practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nasir, N. S., & Cobb, P. (2002). Diversity, equity, and mathematical learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 91–102.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449–475.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076004449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  37. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  38. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.Google Scholar
  39. National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Committee on the Study of Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  40. Nieto, S. (2000). Placing equity front and center: Some thoughts on transforming teacher education for a new century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 180–187.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nolan, K. (2009). Mathematics in and through social justice: Another misunderstood marriage? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 205–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9111-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rech, J. F., & Harrington, J. (2000). Algebra as a gatekeeper: A descriptive study at an urban university. Journal of African American Studies, 4(4), 63–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-000-1022-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roth McDuffie, A., Foote, M. Q., Bolson, C., Turner, E. E., Aguirre, J. M., Bartell, T. G., et al. (2014a). Using video analysis to support prospective K-8 teachers’ noticing of students’ multiple mathematical knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(1), 245–270.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9257-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roth McDuffie, A., Foote, M. Q., Drake, C., Turner, E., Aguirre, J. M., Bartell, T. G., et al. (2014b). Mathematics teacher educators’ use of video analysis to support prospective K- 8 teachers’ noticing. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 2(2), 108–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rubel, L. H., & Chu, H. (2012). Reinscribing urban: Teaching high school mathematics in low income, urban communities of color. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(1), 39–52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9200-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Secada, W. G. (1989). Educational equity versus equality of education: An alternative conception. In W. G. Secada (Ed.), Equity in education (pp. 68–88). New York: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  47. Silver, D., Saunders, M., & Zarate, E. (2008). What factors predict high school graduation in the Los Angeles Unified School District?. Santa Barbara: California Dropout Research Project.Google Scholar
  48. Stein, M. K., Kaufman, J. H., Sherman, M., & Hillen, A. F. (2011). Algebra: A challenge at the crossroads of policy and practice. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 453–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strutchens, M., Bay-Williams, J., Civil, M., Chval, K., Malloy, C. E., White, D. Y., et al. (2012). Foregrounding equity in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tate, W. F. (1995). School mathematics and African American students: Thinking seriously about opportunity-to-learn standards. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(3), 424–448.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x95031003006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taylor, S. V., & Sobel, D. M. (2003). Rich contexts to emphasize social justice in teacher education: Curriculum and pedagogy in professional development schools special issue: Partnering for equity. Equity and Excellence in Education, 36(3), 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Turner, E. E., Drake, C., McDuffie, A. R., Aguirre, J., Bartell, T. G., & Foote, M. Q. (2012). Promoting equity in mathematics teacher preparation: A framework for advancing teacher learning of children’s multiple mathematics knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(1), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). The condition of education 2007 (NCES 2007-064). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  54. Wager, A. A. (2012). Incorporating out-of-school mathematics: From cultural context to embedded practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yow, J. A. (2012). Prospective teacher beliefs about liberative and oppressive mathematics teaching practices: A first step toward equitable instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(1), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Associates in Arts ProgramUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsHuntington UniversityHuntingtonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Curriculum and InstructionPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  4. 4.Department of MathematicsPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations