Advertisement

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 457–475 | Cite as

Video as a tool for focusing teacher self-reflection: supporting and provoking teacher learning

  • Hilary HollingsworthEmail author
  • David Clarke
Article

Abstract

This article describes the research landscape related to the use of video for promoting teacher learning, drawing on a variety of research studies to illustrate the breadth of approaches that have been employed. One particular research study is reported in some detail since, it is argued, this represents a new level of devolution of agency to teachers to play a self-scaffolding role in their own professional education. The study involved the investigation of an approach to the provision of feedback to teachers about their practice that involved stimulating teacher self-reflection and juxtaposed structure and agency. An observation framework grounded in classroom practice research was developed, and teachers selected elements of that framework to serve as the focus for examining their practice and seeking feedback about that practice. Teachers and researchers examined video-recorded lessons focusing on the teachers’ selected observation elements, and then engaged in feedback conversations about their observations and analyses, and the implications of these for future practice. The approach identified the video record as an artefact of the teacher’s own practice and one which demanded a professional response from the teacher. The balance between structure and agency realised in the study, in combination with the use of video for observation and analysis of practice, facilitated teacher self-reflection and functioned to both support and provoke teacher learning.

Keywords

Video Teacher professional growth Teacher self-reflection 

References

  1. AAMT. (2006). AAMT standards for excellence in teaching mathematics in Australian schools. Adelaide: AAMT.Google Scholar
  2. AITSL. (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Melbourne: Educational Services Australia.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, C. (1991). Building a case-based curriculum to enhance the pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, C. (1999). Cases. Journal of Staff Development, 20(3), 26–27.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, D. J. (2012). Videowindow, lens or distorting mirror? Unpublished manuscript. Melbourne: International Centre for Classroom Research, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, D. J., Emanuelsson, J., Jablonka, E., & Mok, I. A. C. (Eds.). (2006a). Making connections: Comparing mathematics classrooms around the world. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, D. J., & Hollingsworth, H. (2000). Seeing is understanding: Examining the merits of video and narrative cases. Journal of Staff Development, 21(4), 40–43.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, D. J., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke, D. J., Hollingsworth, H., & Gorur, R. (2013). Facilitating reflection and action: The possible contribution of video to mathematics teacher education. Sisyphus Journal of Education, 1(3), 94–121.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, D. J., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (Eds.). (2006b). Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, D. J., Mitchell, C., & Bowman, P. (2009). Optimising the use of available technology to support international collaborative research in mathematics classrooms. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 39–60). New York, NY: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, D. J., Xu, L. H., Arnold, J., Seah, L. H., Hart, C., Tytler, R., & Prain, V. (2012). Multi-theoretic approaches to understanding the science classroom. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2011 biennial conference of the european science education research association (Part 3, pp. 26–40). Lyon, France, September 7–11, 2011 (e-Book published March 23, 2012).Google Scholar
  13. Clarke, D. M. (1986). Critical incidents in the mathematics classroom: Teacher notes to accompany video. Clayton, Victoria: Mathematics Education Centre, Monash University.Google Scholar
  14. Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  15. Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris, C. H., Pinnegar, S., & Teemant, A. (2005). The case for hypermedia video ethnographies: Designing a new class of case studies that challenge teaching practice. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 141–161.Google Scholar
  17. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hattie, J. A. C., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  20. Kaur, B., Anthony, G., Ohtani, M., & Clarke, D. (Eds.). (2013). Student voice in mathematics classrooms around the world. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2009). The Pythagoras Study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 137–160). Munster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  22. Krainer, K. (2003). Teams, communities & networks. Journal of Mathematics Teachers Education, 6, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lachance, A., & Confrey, J. (2003). Interconnecting content and community: A qualitative study of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 107–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Louden, W., Rohl, M., & Hopkins, S. (2008). Teaching for growth: Effective teaching of literacy and numeracy. Perth, WA: University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  25. Louden, W., & Wallace, J. (1996). Quality in the classroom: Learning about teaching through case studies. Rydalmere, NSW: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
  26. Merseth, K. (1991). The case for cases in teacher education. Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education and the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  27. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative education and research methods. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Pianta, R., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS), Manual, K-3. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Sherin, M. G., & Van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475–491.Google Scholar
  31. Shulman, L. S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 1–32). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wasserman, S. (1993). Growing teachers: Learning about teaching from studying cases. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  36. Winnie, P. H., & Butler, D. L. (1994). Student cognition in learning from teaching. In T. Husen & T. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 5738–5745). Oxford, England: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  37. Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Council for Educational ResearchCamberwellAustralia
  2. 2.The University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations