# Early childhood teacher education: the case of geometry

- 3.1k Downloads
- 52 Citations

## Abstract

For early childhood, the domain of geometry and spatial reasoning is an important area of mathematics learning. Unfortunately, geometry and spatial thinking are often ignored or minimized in early education. We build a case for the importance of geometry and spatial thinking, review research on professional development for these teachers, and describe a series of research and development projects based on this body of knowledge. We conclude that research-based models hold the potential to make a significant difference in the learning of young children by catalyzing substantive change in the knowledge and beliefs of their teachers.

## Keywords

Scaling up professional development Geometry Spatial reasoning Learning trajectories Early childhood## Notes

### Acknowledgments

The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant No. R305K05157 to the University at Buffalo, State University of New York, D. H. Clements, J. Sarama, and J. Lee, “Scaling Up TRIAD: Teaching Early Mathematics for Understanding with Trajectories and Technologies.” Work on the research was also supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ESI-9730804 to D. H. Clements and J. Sarama “Building Blocks-Foundations for Mathematical Thinking, Pre-Kindergarten to Grade 2: Research-based Materials Development,” and the IERI under NSF Grant No. REC-0228440, “Scaling Up the Implementation of a Pre-Kindergarten Mathematics Curricula: Teaching for Understanding with Trajectories and Technologies.” Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies.

## References

- Ansari, D., Donlan, C., Thomas, M. S. C., Ewing, S. A., Peen, T., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2003). What makes counting count? Verbal and visuo-spatial contributions to typical and atypical number development.
*Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,**85*, 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,**52*, 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999).
*Instruction, capacity, and improvement*. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar - Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching.
*Journal of Teacher Education,**5*, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996, January 19, 1997). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Retrieved February 1, 1997, from http://wwwcsteep.bc.edu/timss.
- Bronowski, J. (1947). Mathematics. In D. Thompson & J. Reeves (Eds.),
*The quality of education: Methods and purposes in the secondary curriculum*(pp. 179–195). London: Frederick Muller.Google Scholar - Brown, M., Blondel, E., Simon, S., & Black, P. (1995). Progression in measuring.
*Research Papers in Education,**10*(2), 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Campbell, P. F., & Rowan, T. E. (1995).
*Project IMPACT: Increasing the mathematical power of all children and teachers (Phase One Implementation Final Report)*. Baltimore, MD: Center for Mathematics Education, University of Maryland.Google Scholar - Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E. H., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. A. (1988). Teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge of students’ problem solving in elementary arithmetic.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**19*, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Casey, M. B., & Erkut, S. (2005, April).
*Early spatial interventions benefit girls and boys.*Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar - Clarke, B. A. (2004). A shape is not defined by its shape: Developing young children’s geometric understanding.
*Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education,**11*(2), 110–127.Google Scholar - Clements, D. H. (2003). Teaching and learning geometry. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.),
*A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics*(pp. 151–178). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.),
*Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 420–464). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar - Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004a). Hypothetical learning trajectories (special issue).
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6*(2), 81–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004b). Learning trajectories in mathematics education.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning,**6*, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007a).
*Building blocks—SRA real math, Grade PreK*. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar - Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007b). Early childhood mathematics learning. In F. K. Lester Jr (Ed.),
*Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1*(pp. 461–555). New York: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar - Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007c). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the
*Building Blocks*project.*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**38*, 136–163.Google Scholar - Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2008). Experimental evaluation of the effects of a research-based preschool mathematics curriculum.
*American Educational Research Journal,**45*, 443–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Spitler, M. E., Lange, A. A., & Wolfe, C. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: A large-scale cluster randomized trial.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**42*(2), 127–166.Google Scholar - Clements, D. H., Swaminathan, S., Hannibal, M. A. Z., & Sarama, J. (1999). Young children’s concepts of shape.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**30*, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Clements, D. H., Wilson, D. C., & Sarama, J. (2004). Young children’s composition of geometric figures: A learning trajectory.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning,**6*, 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cooper, R. (1998).
*Socio*-*cultural and within*-*school factors that affect the quality of implementation of school*-*wide programs. (Tech. Rep. No. 28)*: John Hopkins University, Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk.Google Scholar - Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Pica, P., & Spelke, E. S. (2006). Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group.
*Science,**311*, 381–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Denton, C. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (2003). Scaling reading intervention. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.),
*Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale*(pp. 445–463). Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar - Early, D., Maxwell, K. L., Burchinal, M. R., Alva, S., Bender, R. H., Bryant, D., et al. (2007). Teachers’ education, classroom quality, and young children’s academic skills: Results from seven studies of preschool programs.
*Child Development,**78*, 558–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practices.
*Harvard Educational Review,**66*, 1–25.Google Scholar - Epstein, J. L. (1987). Toward a theory of family-school connections: Teacher practices and parent involvement. In K. Hurrelman, F. Kaufmann, & F. Losel (Eds.),
*Social intervention: Potential and constraints*(pp. 121–136). New York: DeGruyter.Google Scholar - Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1997). Issues of expert flexibility in contexts characterized by complexity and change. In P. J. Feltovich, K. M. Ford, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),
*Expertise in context: Human and machine*(pp. 125–146). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar - Fennema, E. H., Carpenter, T. P., Frank, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**27*, 403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2006a). Primary trainee teachers’ knowledge of parallelograms.
*Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics,**26*(2), 25–30.Google Scholar - Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2006b). Primary trainee teachers’ understanding of basic geometrical figures in Scotland. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká & N. Stehlíková (Eds.),
*Proceedings 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (PME30)*(Vol. 3, pp. 129–136). Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar - Fuys, D., Geddes, D., & Tischler, R. (1988). The van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph Series, 3*, 1–198.Google Scholar - Gagatsis, A. (2003). Young children’s understanding of geometric shapes: The role of geometric models.
*European Early Childhood Education Research Journal,**11*, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gagatsis, A., & Patronis, T. (1990). Using geometrical models in a process of reflective thinking in learning and teaching mathematics.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,**21*, 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Geary, D. C. (2007). An evolutionary perspective on learning disability in mathematics.
*Developmental Neuropsychology,**32*, 471–519.Google Scholar - Ginsburg, A., Cooke, G., Leinwand, S., Noell, J., & Pollock, E. (2005).
*Reassessing U.S. International Mathematics Performance: New Findings from the 2003 TIMSS and PISA*. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar - Ginsburg, H. P., Kaplan, R. G., Cannon, J., Cordero, M. I., Eisenband, J. G., Galanter, M., et al. (2006). Helping early childhood educators to teach mathematics. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.),
*Critical issues in early childhood professional development*(pp. 171–202). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar - Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001).
*Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes*. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar - Han, Y., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2001). Chinese and English mathematics language: The relation between linguistic clarity and mathematics performance.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning,**3*, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hannibal, M. A. Z., & Clements, D. H. (2010). Young children’s understanding of basic geometric shapes.
*Manuscript submitted for publication*.Google Scholar - Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement.
*American Educational Research Journal,**42*, 371–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jacobson, C., & Lehrer, R. (2000). Teacher appropriation and students learning of geometry through design.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**31*, 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jones, K. (2000). Teacher knowledge and professional development in geometry.
*Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics,**20*(3), 109–114.Google Scholar - Jones, K., Mooney, C., & Harries, T. (2002). Trainee primary teachers’ knowledge of geometry for teaching.
*Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics,**22*(2), 95–100.Google Scholar - Klingner, J. K., Ahwee, S., Pilonieta, P., & Menendez, R. (2003). Barriers and facilitators in scaling up research-based practices.
*Exceptional Children,**69*, 411–429.Google Scholar - Larsen, K. (2005).
*Stephen Hawking: A biography*. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar - Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1997).
*Mathematics achievement in the primary school years: IEA’s third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS)*. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.Google Scholar - National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008).
*Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel*. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.Google Scholar - NCTM. (1991).
*Professional standards for teaching mathematics*. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - NCTM. (2006).
*Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence*. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2000).
*Making space: The development of spatial representation and reasoning*. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar - Owens, K. (1999). The role of visualization in young students’ learning. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the 23rd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education*(Vol. 1, pp. 220–234). Haifa, Isreal: Technion.Google Scholar - Peterson, P. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. H. (1989). Teachers’ knowledge of students’ knowledge in mathematics problem solving: Correlational and case analyses.
*Journal of Educational Psychology,**81*, 558–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pinel, P., Piazza, D., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgments.
*Neuron,**41*, 983–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Raudenbush, S. W. (2008). Advancing educational policy by advancing research on instruction.
*American Educational Research Journal,**45*, 206–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rogers, E. M. (2003).
*Diffusion of innovations*(4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar - Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996).
*Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement (Research Progress Report)*. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.Google Scholar - Sarama, J. (2002). Listening to teachers: Planning for professional development.
*Teaching Children Mathematics,**9*, 36–39.Google Scholar - Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009).
*Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children*. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar - Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., & Henry, J. J. (1998). Network of influences in an implementation of a mathematics curriculum innovation.
*International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,**3*, 113–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2008). Scaling up the implementation of a pre-kindergarten mathematics curriculum: Teaching for understanding with trajectories and technologies.
*Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness,**1*, 89–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., & Vukelic, E. B. (1996). The role of a computer manipulative in fostering specific psychological/mathematical processes. In E. Jakubowski, D. Watkins & H. Biske (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 18th annual meeting of the North America Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(Vol. 2, pp. 567–572). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.Google Scholar - Sarama, J., & DiBiase, A.-M. (2004). The professional development challenge in preschool mathematics. In D. H. Clements, J. Sarama, & A.-M. DiBiase (Eds.),
*Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education*(pp. 415–446). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar - Shepard, R. N. (1978). Externalization of mental images and the act of creation. In B. S. Randhawa & W. E. Coffman (Eds.),
*Visual learning, thinking, and communication*(pp. 133–189). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar - Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982).
*Mental images and their transformations*. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar - Showers, B., Joyce, B., & Bennett, B. (1987). Synthesis of research on staff development: A framework for future study and a state-of-the-art analysis.
*Educational Leadership,**45*(3), 77–87.Google Scholar - Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**26*(2), 114–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Smith, I. (1964).
*Spatial ability*. San Diego: Knapp.Google Scholar - Smith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic-molecular theory.
*Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective,**14*(1&2), 1–98.Google Scholar - Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester Jr (Ed.),
*Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1)*(pp. 157–223). New York: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar - Swafford, J., Jones, G. A., & Thorton, C. A. (1997). Increased knowledge in geometry and instructional practice.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**28*, 467–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tatsuoka, K. K., Corter, J. E., & Tatsuoka, C. (2004). Patterns of diagnosed mathematical content and process skills in TIMSS-R across a sample of 20 countries.
*American Educational Research Journal,**41*, 901–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Thomas, B. (1982).
*An abstract of kindergarten teachers’ elicitation and utilization of children’s prior knowledge in the teaching of shape concepts*: Unpublished manuscript, School of Education, Health, Nursing, and Arts Professions, New York University.Google Scholar - van der Sandt, S. (2007). Pre-service geometry education in South Africa: A typical case?
*IUMPST: The Journal*(http://www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu/journal/journal.shtml)*, 1*, 1–9. - van der Sandt, S., & Nieuwoudt, H. D. (2004). Prospective mathematics teachers’ geometry content knowledge: A typical case? In S. Nieuwoudt, S. Froneman & P. Nkhoma (Eds.),
*Proceedings of tenth national congress of the association for mathematics education of South Africa*(pp. 250–262). Potchefstroom: AMESA.Google Scholar - van Hiele, P. M. (1986).
*Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education*. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar - Vinner, S., & Hershkowitz, R. (1980). Concept images and common cognitive paths in the development of some simple geometrical concepts. In R. Karplus (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the fourth international conference for the psychology of mathematics education*(pp. 177–184). Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California.Google Scholar - Wheatley, G. H., Brown, D. L., & Solano, A. (1994). Long term relationship between spatial ability and mathematical knowledge. In D. Kirshner (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the sixteenth annual meeting North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education*(Vol. 1, pp. 225–231). Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University.Google Scholar - Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation.
*Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,**11*, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line.
*Nature,**417*, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar