Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 517–550 | Cite as

Examining instructional practices in Core-Plus lessons: implications for professional development

  • Fran Arbaugh
  • John Lannin
  • Dustin L. Jones
  • Meredith Park-Rogers
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

In the research reported in this article, we sought to understand the instructional practices of 26 secondary teachers from one district who use a problems-based mathematics textbook series (Core-Plus). Further, we wanted to examine beliefs that may be associated with their instructional practices. After analyzing data from classroom observations, our findings indicated that the teachers’ instructional practices fell along a wide continuum of lesson implementation. Analysis of interview data suggested that teachers’ beliefs with regard to students’ ability to do mathematics were associated with their level of lesson implementation. Teachers also differed, by level of instructional practices, in their beliefs about appropriateness of the textbook series for all students. Results strongly support the need for professional development for teachers implementing a problems-based, reform mathematics curriculum. Further, findings indicate that the professional development be designed to meet the diverse nature of teacher needs.

Keywords

Core-Plus curriculum implementation instructional practices professional development secondary mathematics teachers teaching teacher education 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Support for this article was funded in part by the National Science Foundation under two grants: 1) ESI-0138556 and 2) ESI-0333879 – The Center for the Study of Mathematics Curriculum. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Australian Education Council (1994) Mathematics: A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Carlton VIC, Curriculum CorporationGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball D. (1987) Unlearning to teach mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(1):40–48Google Scholar
  3. Boaler J. (2002) Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Mahwah NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown C.A., Cooney T.J. (1982) Research on teacher education: A philosophical orientation. Journal of Research and Development in Education 15(4):13–18Google Scholar
  5. Carpenter T.P., Fennema E., Peterson P.L., Chiang C.P., Loef M. (1989) Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal 2:499–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke D.M. (1997) The changing role of the mathematics teacher. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28:278–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooney T.J. (1985) A beginning teacher’s view of problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 16:324–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corcoran T. (2003) The use of research evidence in instructional improvement (CPRE Policy Brief No RB 40). Philadelphia, Consortium for Policy Research in EducationGoogle Scholar
  9. Coxford A.F., Fey J.T., Hirsch C.R., Schoen H.L., Burrill G., Hart E.W., et al. (1997) Contemporary Mathematics in Context: A unified approach: Course 1. Chicago IL, Everyday LearningGoogle Scholar
  10. Coxford A.F., Fey J.T., Hirsch C.R., Schoen H.L., Burrill G., Hart E.W., et al. (1998a) Contemporary Mathematics in Context: A unified approach: Course 2. Everyday Learning, Chicago ILGoogle Scholar
  11. Coxford A.F., Fey J.T., Hirsch C.R., Schoen H.L., Burrill G., Hart E.W., et al. (1998b) Implementing the Core-Plus mathematics curriculum. Everyday Learning, Chicago ILGoogle Scholar
  12. Coxford A.F., Fey J.T., Hirsch C.R., Schoen H.L., Burrill G., Hart E.W., et al. (1999) Contemporary Mathematics in Context: A unified approach: Course 3. Everyday Learning, Chicago ILGoogle Scholar
  13. Coxford A.F., Fey J.T., Hirsch C.R., Schoen H.L., Burrill G., Hart E.W., et al. (2001) Contemporary Mathematics in Context: A unified approach: Course 4. Everyday Learning, Chicago ILGoogle Scholar
  14. Department for Education and Skills. (2001). Frameworks for teaching mathematics: Years 7, 8, and 9. London: DfES PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  15. Eisenhart, M. (1991) Conceptual frameworks for research circa 1991: Ideas from a cultural anthropologist; implications for mathematics education researchers. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the psychology of mathematics education – North America: Plenary papers & reactions, symposia & papers (p. 202). Christiansburg, VA: Christiansburg Printing Company, IncGoogle Scholar
  16. Ernest P. (1989) Philosophy, mathematics and education. International journal of mathematics education in science and technology 20:555–559Google Scholar
  17. Fennema E., Nelson B. (1997) Mathematics teachers in transition. Mahwah NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  18. Fullan M. (2001) The new meaning of educational change. New York, Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretations of culture. New York: Basic Books IncGoogle Scholar
  20. Hiebert J., Carpenter T.P., Fennema E., Fuson K.C., Wearne D., Murray H., et al. (1997) Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth NH, HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  21. Hinkle D.E., Wiersma W., Jurs S.G. (1988) Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Boston, Houghton Mifflin CompanyGoogle Scholar
  22. Henningsen M., Stein M.K. (1997) Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28:524–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koehler M.S., Grouws D.A. (1992) Mathematics teaching practices and their effects. In: Grouws D.A. (eds), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York, MacMillan, pp. 115–126Google Scholar
  24. Lambdin D.V., Preston R.V. (1995) Caricatures in innovation: Teacher adaptation to an investigation-oriented middle school mathematics curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education 46(2):130–140Google Scholar
  25. Lloyd G.M. (1999) Two teachers’ conceptions of a reform-oriented curriculum: Implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 2:227–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lloyd G.M. (2002) Reform-oriented curriculum implementation as a context for teacher development: An illustration from one mathematics teacher’s experience. Professional Educator 24(2):51–61Google Scholar
  27. Lloyd G.M., Wilson M. (1998) Supporting innovation: The impact of teacher’s conceptions of functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 29:248–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989) Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Author, Reston VAGoogle Scholar
  29. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991) Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Author, Reston VAGoogle Scholar
  30. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995) Assessment standards for school mathematics. Author, Reston VAGoogle Scholar
  31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000) Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston VA, AuthorGoogle Scholar
  32. National Research Council (2001) Adding it up. Washington DC, National Academy PressGoogle Scholar
  33. National Research Council (2005) How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington DC, National Academy PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Pajares M.K. (1992) Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research 62:307–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Putnam R.T., Heaton R.M., Prawat R., Remillard J. (1992) Teaching mathematics for understanding: Discussing case studies of four fifth-grade teachers. Elementary School Journal 93:213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Remillard J.T. (2005) Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research 75:211–246Google Scholar
  37. Remillard J.T., Bryans M.B. (2004) Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 35(5):352–388Google Scholar
  38. Riordin J.E., Noyce P.E. (2001) The impact of two standards-based mathematics curricula on student achievement in Massachusetts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 32:368–398Google Scholar
  39. Schoen H.L., Cebulla K.J., Finn K.F., Fi C. (2003) Teacher variables that relate to student achievement when using a standards-based curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 34:228–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stein M.K., Smith M.S. (1998) Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 3:268–275Google Scholar
  41. Stein M.K., Smith M.S., Henningsen M.A., Silver E.A. (2000) Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
  42. Stein, M. K., Smith, M., & Silver, E. A. (1999). The development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new settings in new ways. Harvard Educational Review, 69, 237–269Google Scholar
  43. Stigler J.W., Hiebert J. (1999) The teaching gap: Best ideas form the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  44. Sullivan P., Mousley J. (2001) Thinking teaching: Seeing mathematics teachers as active decision makers. In: Lin F-L, Cooney TJ (eds), Making sense of mathematics teacher education. The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 147–163Google Scholar
  45. Tarr, J. E., Reys, R., Chavez, O. & Shih, J. (2006). A longitudinal study of mathematics curriculum & student achievement. Paper presented at the research presession of the annual meeting of the national council of teachers of mathematics, St. Louis, MO, April 2006Google Scholar
  46. Thompson A. (1984) The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics 15:105–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thompson, A. G. (1992). The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. In Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson G., Warren S., Carter L. (2004) It’s not my fault: Predicting high school teachers who blame parents and students for students’ low achievement. The High School Journal 87(3):5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Watson A., DeGeest E. (2005) Principled teaching for deep progress: Improving mathematical learning beyond methods and materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics 58:209–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weiss I.R., Pasley J.D., Smith P.S., Banilower E.R., Heck D.J. (2003) Looking inside the classroom: A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill NC, Horizon Research IncorporatedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilson M., Lloyd G.M. (2000) Sharing mathematical authority with students: The challenge for high school teachers. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 15(2):146–169Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fran Arbaugh
    • 1
  • John Lannin
    • 1
  • Dustin L. Jones
    • 2
  • Meredith Park-Rogers
    • 3
  1. 1.University of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Sam Houston State UniversityHuntsvilleUSA
  3. 3.Indiana University201 N Rose AvenueUSA

Personalised recommendations