Viewing Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs as Sensible Systems*
This article discusses theoretical assumptions either explicitly stated or implied in research on teachers’ beliefs. Such research often assumes teachers can easily articulate their beliefs and that there is a one-to-one correspondence between what teachers state and what researchers think those statements mean. Research conducted under this paradigm often reports inconsistencies between teachers’ beliefs and their actions. This article describes an alternative framework for conceptualizing teachers’ beliefs that views teachers as inherently sensible rather than inconsistent beings. Instead of viewing teachers’ beliefs as inconsistent, teachers’ abilities to articulate their beliefs as well as researchers’ interpretations of those beliefs are seen as problematic. Implications of such a view for research on teacher beliefs as well as for the practice of mathematics teacher education are discussed.
Key wordsbelief systems teacher beliefs teacher education theoretical frameworks
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Green T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Jaworski B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry. Falmer Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Leatham K. R. (2002). Preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs about teaching with technology. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GAGoogle Scholar
- Leder G. C., Pehkonen E., Törner G. (eds.), (2002). Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (Vol. 31). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Merriam-webster online dictionary. (2005). Retrieved February 15, 2005, from www.m-w.com/.Google Scholar
- Pehkonen, E. & Furinghetti, F. (2001). An attempt to clarify definitions of the basic concepts: Belief, conception, knowledge. In R. Speiser, C. A. Maher & C. N. Walter (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 647–655). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.Google Scholar
- Pintrich P. R. (2002). Future challenges and directions for theory and research on personal epistemology. In: Hofer B. K., Pintrich P. R. (eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 389–414Google Scholar
- Rokeach M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Skott, J. (2001b, June). Why belief research raises the right question but provides the wrong type of answer. Paper presented at the 3rd Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education, Kristianstad, Sweden.Google Scholar
- Thagard P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
- Thompson A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In: Grouws D. A. (ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York, pp. 127–146Google Scholar