Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 33–52 | Cite as

Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning

OriginalPaper

Abstract

It is over 25 years since Wood, Bruner and Ross (1976, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100) introduced the idea of ‘scaffolding’ to represent the way children’s learning can be supported. Despite problems, this metaphor has enduring attraction in the way it emphasises the intent to support a sound foundation with increasing independence for the learner as understanding becomes more secure. It has resonance with the widely accepted notion in teaching of construction and the constructivist paradigm for learning. The discussion that follows will characterise some teaching approaches that can be identified as scaffolding, revisiting some of the original classifications, and identifying further scaffolding strategies with particular reference to mathematics learning. Examples will be given from studies relating to geometry learning with four to 6 year olds and to arithmetic learning with older pupils.

Keywords

classroom interactions explaining mathematics scaffolding teaching and learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anghileri J. (1995). Language, arithmetic and the negotiation of meaning. For the Learning of Mathematics 21(3):10–14Google Scholar
  2. Anghileri J. (2000). Teaching number sense. Continuum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Anghileri J., Baron S. (1998). Playing with the materials of study: Poleidoblocs. Education 3–13 27(2):57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anghileri J. (eds) (2001). Principles and practice in arithmetic teaching. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  5. Askew M., Brown M., Rhodes V., Wiliam D., Johnson D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy: Report carried out for the TTA. King’s College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Askew M., Wiliam D. (1995). Recent research in mathematics education 5-16. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Bliss J., Askew M., Macrae S. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: Scaffolding revisited. Oxford Review of Education 22(1):37–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cobb P., Boufi A., McClain K., Whitenack J. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28:258–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1991). Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers. In R. Davis, C. Maher & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views of the teaching and learning of mathematics. JRME monograph no. 4. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of MathematicsGoogle Scholar
  10. Cobb P., Yackel E., McClain K. (eds) (2000) Communicating and symbolizing in mathematics, perspectives on discourse, tools and instructional design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  11. Coltman P., Anghileri J., Petyaeva D. (2002). Scaffolding learning through meaningful tasks and adult interaction, Early Years 22(1):39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gravemeijer K., Cobb P., Bowers J., Whitenack J. (2000). Symbolizing, modeling and instructional design. In: Cobb P., Yackel E., McClain K. (eds) Communicating and symbolizing in mathematics, perspectives on discourse, tools and instructional design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  13. Hobsbaum A., Peters S., Sylva K. (1996). Scaffolding in reading recovery. Oxford Review of Education 22(1):17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Light P., Littleton P. (1999). Social practices in children’s learning. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. McClain K., Cobb P., Gravemeijer K., Estes B. (1999). Developing mathematical reasoning within the context of measurement. In: Stiff L. (eds) Developing mathematical reasoning in Grades K-12. NCTM Yearbook 1999. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  16. Pimm D. (1987). Speaking mathematically. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (QCA) (1999). Teaching written calculation strategies. Her Majesty Stationary Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Rogoff B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In: Wertsch J., del Rio P., Alvarez A. (eds) sociocultural studies of mind. Cambridge University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Rogoff B., Mistry J., Goncu A., Mosier C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  20. Rogoff B., Wertsch J. (1984). Children’s learning in the ‘zone of proximal development’. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  21. Tharpe R., Gallimore R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. van Oers B. (2000). Learning mathematics as a meaningful activity. In: Steffe L., Nesher P. (eds) Theories of mathematical learning. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 91–113Google Scholar
  23. Wood T. (1994). Patterns of interaction and the culture of mathematics classrooms. In: Lerman S. (ed) Cultural perspectives on the mathematics classroom. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  24. Wood D., Bruner J., Ross G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations